search for: buzy

...e size of the ad db dir on every server now. i think, something in the old db import causes a resyncwhen you modify something in the db  so i suggest try monitoring, disk io and cpu, look for buzzy files.  if we know the files, we know the processes using it. if one all servers the same files are buzy.  then maybe you found an unknown bug. the old db came from which  samba version, tell about the old setup, did you use a ldap backend for example? maybe a post of your old config can be handy also. greetz, Louis Op 29 aug. 2016 om 20:46 heeft Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.s...

...gt; >> i think, something in the old db import causes a resyncwhen you modify >> something in the db >> so i suggest try monitoring, disk io and cpu, look for buzzy files. >> if we know the files, we know the processes using it. if one all servers >> the same files are buzy. >> then maybe you found an unknown bug. >> >> >> the old db came from which samba version, tell about the old setup, did >> you use a ldap backend for example? >> maybe a post of your old config can be handy also. >> >> >> greetz, >> &gt...

...bad magic 0x198 at offset=1044437120 ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - Indexed and full searches both failed! On dc2 the same "samba-tool dbcheck cross-ncs" says: "checking 187478 objects". Has been running for many hours now, I have no idea how far it is. The server is pretty buzy doing it. So, my working conclusion is that on DC1 the DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com has become corrupted, and therefore fails to replicate to dc2. Does the list agree with this? I hope that dc2 is still having the correct DC=DomainDnsZones. But, since replication seems to be o...

...ncwhen you modify > something in the db > so i suggest try monitoring, disk io and cpu, look for > buzzy files. > if we know the files, we know the processes using it. if > one all servers > the same files are buzy. > then maybe you found an unknown bug. > > > the old db came from which samba version, tell about the > old setup, did > you use a ldap backend for example? > maybe a post of your old config can be handy also. > &...

...out if there is a > way to allow a few non-domain machines to mount shares. Add the needed REALM in /etc/krb5.conf Add the computername to the DNS (A+PTR), create a user that keeps the needed SPN/UPN for the computer, the no joined computer. Add CIFS/spn to it. something like that, im just to buzy to have a good look at it. ( optional add root/spn ) But now you should be able todo cifs mounts with kerberos without joining the domain. Or just just user= pass= domain= for the mount settings. mount -t cifs -o credentials=/path/to/secret-info-file //host.FQDN/share /mnt/folder >net rpc...

Aah.. Sorry typo. systemctl unmask samba-ad-dc (umask / unmask ) systemctl enable samba-ad-dc systemctl start samba-ad-dc Im very buzy, so slow in responce atm, but if a service fails to upgrade and starts it gets masked. Unmasking is needed then. To make sure its all enable i also run extra enable. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Stefan G. Weichinger [mailto:lists at xunil.at] > Verzonden: vrijdag 6 maart...

Hi, To upgrade my secondary DC Samba 4.5-16 to 4.8 should I remove the smb.conf file in /etc/samba first? I remember I tried last month to upgrade from 4.5-16 to 4.7 and broke the installation. Or are just the procedures below enough? Create this file repo file for apt. echo "deb http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian stretch-samba48 main contrib non-free" | sudo tee -a

...script that automatically checks replication every few minutes. I was the one reporting the highwatermark back in 2017, but we're not getting those now. Between 2017 and now, we stopped testing azure, and I took it up again only last week. On the samba DC side, we observe that samba is very buzy talking to the Azure AD Connect machine, even though we filter sync using one group containing only three members, and none of them are actually changing. (this is just for testing now) How many users are you syncing? Are you using pass-through authentication, or syncing password hashes? And i...

...ew minutes. >> >> I was the one reporting the highwatermark back in 2017, but we're not >> getting those now. Between 2017 and now, we stopped testing azure, >> and I took it up again only last week. >> >> On the samba DC side, we observe that samba is very buzy talking to >> the Azure AD Connect machine, even though we filter sync using one >> group containing only three members, and none of them are actually >> changing. (this is just for testing now) How many users are you syncing? >> >> Are you using pass-through authen...

Samba 4.8 (Louis debian repo), DM. Today i've had to recovery a deleted file in that share, that use 'vfs_recycle' modules: [Work] comment = Spazio di Lavoro Utente map acl inherit = Yes path = /srv/work read only = No store dos attributes = Yes vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle full_audit volume = Work full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = mkdir rmdir read pread

...y server now. > > > i think, something in the old db import causes a resyncwhen you modify > something in the db > so i suggest try monitoring, disk io and cpu, look for buzzy files. > if we know the files, we know the processes using it. if one all servers > the same files are buzy. > then maybe you found an unknown bug. > > > the old db came from which samba version, tell about the old setup, did > you use a ldap backend for example? > maybe a post of your old config can be handy also. > > > greetz, > > > Louis > > > > > &g...

...hink, something in the old db import causes a resyncwhen you modify >>> something in the db >>> so i suggest try monitoring, disk io and cpu, look for buzzy files. >>> if we know the files, we know the processes using it. if one all servers >>> the same files are buzy. >>> then maybe you found an unknown bug. >>> >>> >>> the old db came from which samba version, tell about the old setup, did >>> you use a ldap backend for example? >>> maybe a post of your old config can be handy also. >>> >>&g...

...e size of the ad db dir on every server now. i think, something in the old db import causes a resyncwhen you modify something in the db  so i suggest try monitoring, disk io and cpu, look for buzzy files.  if we know the files, we know the processes using it. if one all servers the same files are buzy.  then maybe you found an unknown bug. the old db came from which  samba version, tell about the old setup, did you use a ldap backend for example? maybe a post of your old config can be handy also. greetz, Louis Op 29 aug. 2016 om 20:46 heeft Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.s...

...No, keep everything as is. Since your upgrading from 4.5 ( and this is probely why your upgrade to 4.7 broke ) Make sure you settings are respecting config requirements of 4.8. If you do hit an error. Read : http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Upgrade-info.txt And if needed mail the list, im buzy with some servers atm, but i'll keep an eye on the list. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marcio Demetrio Bacci via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 30 augustus 2019 11:13 > Aan: sambalist > Ond...

I recently had a bear of a time getting a Polycom Soundpoint 500IP up and registered.. Now that its registered I ran into a problem w/ the dialplan. Needing to dial x101 I'd dial 10 - then get a fast buzy.. Also making a local call - dialing 95551212- would give me a fast busy after the 7th digit - so 9555121.. Same w/ LD calls... This dialplan really got me down as I didn't find any docs on this. Look toward the web based interface was no help either. To fix the problem I eventually di...

OK now your question is starting to make sense. What happens if bosses line is buzy do calls 'rollover' to line 2 and 3? What criteria will define access to the other lines? Alex ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Faisal Inam Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1...

...lly speaking, it seems that the structure to report an error is badly implemented, and makes the error messages not clear enough. For example, we might get a Code 23 error, but don't know anything about it. This makes misconfigurations difficult to find out and makes the mailing list far too buzy providing support to all users who don't know about that or this problem. I think that the code should be a bit rewritten as for the output of the messages. Normally we can know if there was a memory problem, a disk problem, a file that was missing when doing the copy (and which one) or any...

Pisch Tam?s <pischta at gmail.com> ezt ?rta (id?pont: 2019. j?l. 4., Cs, 13:15): > > >OK, I set up Buster RC3 in a VM > Thanks a lot! > > >I could add 'Domain Admins' to the 'Properties' on the share without any > >problem. > :o > > > Back to Buster machine: > > root at dbrc3:~# ls -lad /home/users > > drwxrwx---+ 2 root

...and that Ralph B?hme claims that password-hashes should also work, after making the sync account MSOL_604447e... a member of "domain admins". (instead of keeping the default rights that are granted by the installer, which directory ACLs are not honored by the Samba DRSR RPC service) Buzy today, but in the coming days I will spend some time trying to see if I can make the password hash sync work as well. (if it works for Ralph B?hme, we should also be able to make it work) :-) Thanks for updating here! MJ On 25/10/2020 17:11, Michal Bruncko via samba wrote: > hello all >...

.../srv/work/.cestino/ Which sets : "creator Owner" (1), Owner (7), Group (7), World (0) So the owner and groups can create anything but your enforcing "creator owner" Then set: recycle:subdir_mode = 1700 recycle:directory_mode = 1700 I've not fully checked it, im to buzy with my builder atm. But im sure its something like that. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Gaiarin via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 16 oktober 2019 15:14 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org &g...