search for: bundled

I asked this question earlier and did recieve an answer but I am not sure Ifully understood the answer as I am getting all sorts of errors when trying to implement. Basically I want to add a layer to the path for my files. I have the following set up in my model class: file_column :image, :store_dir => :dynamic_dir def dynamic_dir

Hi, I can''t get breakpointer to work on locomotive. Pretty sure it used to work... Any ideas?? Jeroen jeroen$ ruby script/breakpointer /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-1.0.0-max.bundle/Contents/Resources/ports/lib/ruby/1.8/drb/drb.rb:828:in `getaddrinfo'': getaddrinfo: No address associated with nodename (SocketError) from

One of our developers is getting a weird error from attachment_fu and/or rmagick on OSX. And even weirder because he''s used attachment_fu and rmagick on other projects without difficulty. This all works fine on debian/ubuntu. See the stack trace below. Any suggestions? Btw, the code that''s blowing up is retrieving the attachment_fu info. The presence of image_science in

Here''s my case: Using a link_to popup window to show a related help file of an element on a page. The problem: Window pops up perfectly, but refuses to carryover @instance variables in the controller that I referenced in the link_to command. The tests: - I have the right controller/class, because it renders a specific template, which is what it does. - I have the right template/view,

Whatever I do to try to connect including trying different ISPs, I get the same errors, here they are: Errno::ECONNREFUSED in Events#send_my_email Connection refused - connect(2) Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-0.14.1-min.bundle/Contents/ Resources/ports/lib/ruby/1.8/net/protocol.rb:83:in `initialize''

...chineInstr: This is the most natural (meaning it looks most like the real HW bundle) representation. It has the nice property that most passes do not have to check if a MI is a bundle.The concern here this can add significant memory overhead if this means adding a ilist or SmallVector field to keep bundled MIs. 2. Add a bit to MachineInstr: The bit means the next MI in the list is part of the same bundle. This is very light weight. However it requires many passes to check wether a MI is part of a bundle. The solution is a combination of both #1 and #2. Conceptually we want a representation that look...

I am using machine instruction bundles [1] before register allocation. This appears not to be too common today and I'd really like some input on the intentions and plans of the current system. And would like some input on clean up proposals. [1] I am currently experimenting to use machine instruction bundles to reliably form macroop fusion opportunities without spills, reloads, splits or

...g.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating lib/dummy config.status: creating zlib/dummy config.status: creating popt/dummy config.status: creating shconfig config.status: creating config.h config.status: config.h is unchanged rsync 3.0.1 configuration successful # make (Bundled) cc: warning 422: Unknown option "-Wno-unused-parameter" ignored. (Bundled) cc: "lib/pool_alloc.h", line 10: error 1000: Unexpected symbol: "size". (Bundled) cc: "lib/pool_alloc.h", line 10: warning 5: "const" will become a keyword. (Bundled) cc: &q...

> On Oct 27, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> wrote: > > == BUNDLE instruction / operands == > For many backend passes a bundle can appear as a single unit. However one important tool > here is having an iterator over all operands of this unit. > > The original RFC indicates that to achieve this without changing a big number > of passes an

...uction into bundles (like the old IA-64 back-end did) without changing the order of the instructions produces bad code. Instead, a VLIW scheduler that directly outputs bundles produces better code. The current LLVM scheduler (at the end of the instruction selection pass) is not suitable to generate bundled instructions since it operates on scheduling units for glued instructions. However, the post-RA scheduler in combination with a VLIW-aware hazard recognizer can be used before RA to bundle and schedule instructions for VLIW architectures. Only small modifications within the post-RA scheduler classe...

Hi, We have a new BE for a VLIW-like processor and I'm currently working on instruction bundles. Ideally, I'd like to have bundles *before* RA to model certain constraints, e.g. the exposed one by Tzu-Chien a while ago in his thread http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2005-September/004798.html In order to build bundles, we have added a new bottom-up MIScheduler, right after

...chineInstr: This is the most natural (meaning it looks most like the real HW bundle) representation. It has the nice property that most passes do not have to check if a MI is a bundle.The concern here this can add significant memory overhead if this means adding a ilist or SmallVector field to keep bundled MIs. 2. Add a bit to MachineInstr: The bit means the next MI in the list is part of the same bundle. This is very light weight. However it requires many passes to check wether a MI is part of a bundle. The solution is a combination of both #1 and #2. Conceptually we want a representation that...

> On Oct 27, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Oct 27, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> wrote: >> >> == BUNDLE instruction / operands == >> For many backend passes a bundle can appear as a single unit. However one important tool >> here is having an iterator over all operands of this

...chineInstr: This is the most natural (meaning it looks most like the real HW bundle) representation. It has the nice property that most passes do not have to check if a MI is a bundle.The concern here this can add significant memory overhead if this means adding a ilist or SmallVector field to keep bundled MIs. > 2. Add a bit to MachineInstr: The bit means the next MI in the list is part of the same bundle. This is very light weight. However it requires many passes to check wether a MI is part of a bundle. > > The solution is a combination of both #1 and #2. Conceptually we want a represen...

...chineInstr: This is the most natural (meaning it looks most like the real HW bundle) representation. It has the nice property that most passes do not have to check if a MI is a bundle.The concern here this can add significant memory overhead if this means adding a ilist or SmallVector field to keep bundled MIs. 2. Add a bit to MachineInstr: The bit means the next MI in the list is part of the same bundle. This is very light weight. However it requires many passes to check wether a MI is part of a bundle. The solution is a combination of both #1 and #2. Conceptually we want a representation that...

Hi Jakob, 2012/6/6 Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk <mailto:stoklund at 2pi.dk>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com <mailto:ivanllopard at gmail.com>> wrote: > We have a new BE for a VLIW-like processor and I'm currently working on > instruction bundles. Ideally, I'd like to have bundles

...quickly. I wanted to avoid bugs from a > global s/setIsInsideBundle/bundleWithPred/g search and replace. This is a good intent. Maybe a bit temporal but sound nevertheless. > finalizeBundle is calling 'MIBundleBuilder Bundle(MBB, FirstMI, > LastMI)' which ought to work with pre-bundled instructions. Not exactly. Let me illustrate couple cases here (for illustration purposes "^" means "isBundledWithPred()" and "v" means "isBundledWithSucc()"): I have the following (existing) bundle for which I want to regenerate the bundle header (You see...

Hi all In another thread I complain about an error I get after trying to get Globalize working. http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/51988#new Now I want to ask you, if anybody of you has ever got Globalize working? I have done exactly what''s written in the (absolutely much too short) tutorial of its wiki... http://globalize.diluvia.net/wiki ...and I''m very frustrated that no

On Jun 6, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: > We have a new BE for a VLIW-like processor and I'm currently working on > instruction bundles. Ideally, I'd like to have bundles *before* RA to > model certain constraints, e.g. the exposed one by Tzu-Chien a while ago > in his thread >

...the fix should be depends on if this bundle is legal or not: BUNDLE %vreg39<imp-def,dead> * %vreg39:hiAcc<def> = mv_ar16_ar16_lo16In32 %vreg37 [...] %vreg39 isn't used after the bundle so the dead-marking in the BUNDLE is correct. However, the def in the actual bundled instruction defining %vreg39 is not marked with dead. Is the above bundle ok or not? When the register allocator later tries to spill/reload %vreg39 it thinks that %vreg39 is live, so it inserts a reload after the bundle, but then the verifier pukes on it and says that there is a use of the...