Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bulidbot".
Did you mean:
buildbot
2014 Jan 21
2
[LLVMdev] C++0x Bug in CMake?
...shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> ../../lib/libLLVMAArch64CodeGen.a: could not read symbols: Bad value
> clang-3.4: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to
> see invocation)
> [ 95%] make[2]: *** [lib/libLTO.so] Error 1
>
> The same can be seen on some of our bulidbots (those that use Clang and
> CMake).
This *could* be the same thing I suppose... If my fix actually helps,
please let me know. But I don't completely see how this particular error
happens so I'll be intrigued.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
U...
2014 Jan 21
4
[LLVMdev] C++0x Bug in CMake?
Chandler,
I may be doing this wrong, but I'm getting a weird error in building LLVM
with Clang via CMake.
On x86_64:
$ CC=clang CXX=clang++ cmake -G Ninja ../../src/llvm
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_BUILD_TESTS=True
-DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True
On ARM:
$ CC=clang CXX=clang++ cmake -G Ninja ../src/ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../install
2019 Nov 12
8
RFC: Using GitHub Actions for CI testing on the release/* branches
Hi,
I would like to start using GitHub Actions[1] for CI testing on the release/*
branches. As far as I know we don't have any buildbots listening to the
release branches, and I think GitHub Actions are a good way for us to quickly
bring-up some CI jobs there.
My proposal is to start by adding two post-commit CI jobs to the release/9.x branch.
One for building and testing (ninja checka-all)