Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "buky".
Did you mean:
boky
2005 Dec 06
0
Buky cials-tabs at Unbelievable Prices
Be ERECT in less than 15 mins
PRlCE: $ 2 / use
visit our website --> goldslive.net
2003 Dec 04
1
Stallion EC8/32-AT
Anybody successfully using the Stallion EC8/32-AT on -stable? I just
tried using the one I got on ebay and found that it hands on port
close and passes no characters at all. Do any of the stallion cards
work?
Warner
2001 Nov 28
8
PAM, keyboard interactive, pam-1@ssh.com, interoperability
...incorporate keyboard-interactive into ssh.com's
product?
* Are the openssh code maintainers open to a contribution of
pam-1 at ssh.com support, or is this just too sore a subject for
somebody?
* Or am I missing something -- do I have more interoperability than
I think I do?
Liudvikas Bukys
bukys at rochester.edu
2001 Mar 12
3
PAM & several passwords
Hi,
Is there any hope getting openssh to support a sequence
of several authentication methods (requiring different
passwords) for one login?
I.e. take the standard static password, feed it into
pam_unix.so for verification, then ask the user for yet
another password (e.g. a one-time password) and verify
this one by a different PAM module
Currently, verifying either a static password or a one
time
2007 Jan 03
9
[Announce] Web-MeetMe 3.0.0 released
We've been holding back on this release to coincide with
the Asterisk 1.4.0 release.
This is mostly a compatibility release, but there are a
few new features:
* No longer requires register_globals in PHP
* Separated code from configuration settings in
./lib/defines.php (hopefully this will make
future upgrades easier)
* Migrated all database interfaces to PEAR::DB
which
2006 Oct 11
0
Re: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 27, Issue 49
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Doug Lytle <support@drdos.info>
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <
> asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:25:11 -0400
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] How big is *your* dialplan??
> Steve Murphy wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > In my relentless
2007 Jan 07
0
Re: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7
On 1/3/07, asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com <
asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com> wrote:
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Dan Austin" <Dan_Austin@Phoenix.com>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <
> asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:33:02 -0800
> Subject:
2007 Jan 17
4
windows mobile 5 softphone for square screen devices
Guys, anybody has seen or is using some kind of softphone on any square
screen device with WM5? Ive tried sjlabs one and xten for pocket pc and they
do work on Wm5 but they are designed for standard screens, anybody using
anything on square ones?
2007 Jan 18
5
1 phone 2 voicemail accounts
What is the best way to have 1 phone check multiple voicemail accounts. I am using polycom 650 phones, and am wondering if mwi can work when checking multiple accounts.
-Chris
Sent from my BlackBerry? wireless handheld
2005 Oct 10
3
Help, please help -- IAX2 softphone to server on LAN
I've already sunk several hours into this without any
real progress, so I'd really appreciate any help My
task is simple -- establish a connection between a
softphone on XP ProSP2 to a Asterisk server on Linux
FC4 over a LAN through a Netgear router. The server
will then go out to a PSTN termination service.
Thus far, the PSTN termination connection works fine
-- I've opened up 4569
2006 Oct 10
28
How big is *your* dialplan??
Hello!
In my relentless quest for knowledge, I pose this question: who's got
the biggest
dialplans, and how big are these monsters?
What's the biggest dialplan in use right now? If you feel you are a
competitor,
let me know how many contexts/extensions/priorities you are dealing
with. Maybe the
context with the most extensions, the extension with the most priorities
would be
2012 Feb 10
21
Reducing the need to compile a custom kernel
Hi,
during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of
the problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but
can't as they are using a custom kernel. With all the kernel modules
we provide, the need for a custom kernel should be small, but on the
other hand, we do not provide a small kernel-skeleton where you can
load just the modules you need.
2003 Sep 18
0
privsep lost sometime between 3.5p1 and 3.7.1p1?
I haven't recompiled since 3.5p1.
I compile --with-privsep-user=nobody
* I observe that none of my processes is uid "nobody".
In addition, previously I had to disable privsep on either AIX or OSF1
(I forget which), this time it just worked. I was thinking it was
because Progress Had Been Made. Now, observing so many root processes,
I think it's because privsep is not actually