Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "buildbot6".
Did you mean:
buildbot
2019 Jan 31
2
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...-- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0)
>
> Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com>
> hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2
> hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2
>
> Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
> sanitizer-buildbot6 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4
>
> Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
> sanitizer-windows -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0)
>
> Ilia Taraban <mstester.llvm at gmail.com>
> windows7-buildbot -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0)
>
&...
2019 Feb 02
2
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...ter at quicinc.com>>
>>> hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2
>>> hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2
>>>
>>> Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>>
>>> sanitizer-buildbot6 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4
>>>
>>> Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>>
>>> sanitizer-windows -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0)
>>>
>>> Ilia Taraban <mstester.llvm at gmail.com <m...
2019 Feb 07
5
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...at quicinc.com <mailto:llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com>>
> hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2
> hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2
>
> Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>>
> sanitizer-buildbot6 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4
>
> Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>>
> sanitizer-windows -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0)
>
> Ilia Taraban <mstester.llvm at gmail.com <mailto:mstester.llvm at gmail.com>>...
2019 Jan 26
4
[RFC] migrating past C++11
+1, thanks again for driving this.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:57 PM JF Bastien via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> The discussion seems to have died down and gotten good consensus. I’ve
> therefore create a patch which applies the proposed soft-errors:
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D57264
>
>
> We’ll only migrate to hard-error (and start using new