search for: buildbot6

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "buildbot6".

Did you mean: buildbot
2019 Jan 31
2
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...-- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com> > hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > > Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> > sanitizer-buildbot6 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 > > Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> > sanitizer-windows -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Ilia Taraban <mstester.llvm at gmail.com> > windows7-buildbot -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > &...
2019 Feb 02
2
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...ter at quicinc.com>> >>> hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 >>> hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 >>> >>> Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> >>> sanitizer-buildbot6 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 >>> >>> Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>> >>> sanitizer-windows -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) >>> >>> Ilia Taraban <mstester.llvm at gmail.com <m...
2019 Feb 07
5
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...at quicinc.com <mailto:llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com>> > hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > > Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> > sanitizer-buildbot6 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 > > Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>> > sanitizer-windows -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Ilia Taraban <mstester.llvm at gmail.com <mailto:mstester.llvm at gmail.com>>...
2019 Jan 26
4
[RFC] migrating past C++11
+1, thanks again for driving this. On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:57 PM JF Bastien via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > The discussion seems to have died down and gotten good consensus. I’ve > therefore create a patch which applies the proposed soft-errors: > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D57264 > > > We’ll only migrate to hard-error (and start using new