search for: bugaboo

On 31/12/17 16:44, Peter Moody wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:47 PM, David Newall<openssh at davidnewall.com> wrote: >> Of course it's the client's fault. The client worked, was changed, and thus >> stopped working. > don't upgrade your client. problem solved. you're at fault for not > pinning your dependencies when you have hard dependencies.

...ans that Clang will always be behind the curve on Windows, since, even if MSVC++ ABI support is fully usable one day, no one will be willing to link it with object files from a new major version of MSVC without some critical mass of users being guinea pigs first and ensuring that there are no major bugaboos. I agree that there is value in supporting implementing full MSVC++ ABI, if it can be done, but it seems like that support can never be 100% complete (or, more to the point, known to be 100% complete) unless Microsoft itself decides to officially support the implementation or completely stabilize...

...the curve on Windows, since, >> even if MSVC++ ABI support is fully usable one day, no one will be >> willing to link it with object files from a new major version of MSVC >> without some critical mass of users being guinea pigs first and >> ensuring that there are no major bugaboos. >> >> I agree that there is value in supporting implementing full MSVC++ >> ABI, if it can be done, but it seems like that support can never be >> 100% complete (or, more to the point, known to be 100% complete) >> unless Microsoft itself decides to officially suppor...

...always be behind the curve on Windows, since, > even if MSVC++ ABI support is fully usable one day, no one will be > willing to link it with object files from a new major version of MSVC > without some critical mass of users being guinea pigs first and > ensuring that there are no major bugaboos. > > I agree that there is value in supporting implementing full MSVC++ > ABI, if it can be done, but it seems like that support can never be > 100% complete (or, more to the point, known to be 100% complete) > unless Microsoft itself decides to officially support the > implemen...

I have a friend who has been having an intermittent problem with his nice, shiny new IBM x226 server. It's a Xeon processor, 1.5Gb RAM, hardware RAID controller running CentOS 3 The system will will sometimes run for a couple of weeks, then simply lock up -- nothing on the console, no response to pings, no "caps-lock" lights, no kernel panic indicators, nothing in the logs to

...I monitor that thing in a reasonable way?", and a very very very minor influencing factor is "will the management card do SNMPv3, or SSH with o 2048 bit RSA key size"? Your extreme point of view is just unrealistic for such devices and vendors. > and I'm not sure what your bugaboo is about a fractured user base; at > any given time there are probably hundreds of different versions of > openssh being distributed due to different os's, distros, etc. > > by the way, do you not see that every one of your arguments about the > openssh client can be applied, al...

...achieve that.? I have a number of IBM servers for which access to the remote console now requires old versions of Java and old browsers.? That's IBM.? If they're not going to update equipment, nobody is.? Let's not pretend the world works differently. > I'm not sure what your bugaboo is about a fractured user base; at > any given time there are probably hundreds of different versions of > openssh being distributed due to different os's, distros, etc. Every older version of openssh is on the path to the latest version, unless there's a reason why the latest versi...

...s, since, > >> even if MSVC++ ABI support is fully usable one day, no one will be > >> willing to link it with object files from a new major version of MSVC > >> without some critical mass of users being guinea pigs first and > >> ensuring that there are no major bugaboos. > >> > >> I agree that there is value in supporting implementing full MSVC++ > >> ABI, if it can be done, but it seems like that support can never be > >> 100% complete (or, more to the point, known to be 100% complete) > >> unless Microsoft itself dec...

Charles Davis <cdavis5x at gmail.com> writes: > Huh? Intel CC supports the MSVC++ ABI. Zortech (Digital Mars) supports > it, too (though the guy who wrote it isn't too proud of that fact--or > the fact that he even wrote that compiler to begin with). Heck, even > CodeWarrior supported it (as Howard Hinnant might well remember), > before Metrowerks sold off their x86

On Jul 30, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Stephen Lin wrote: >> Right. What's the point of all the effort devoted to MSVC++ ABI >> compatibility when Clang doesn't need it for being a top-notch C++ >> compiler on Windows? > > I brought up a similar point a little bit earlier, too.... > > It seems like the only necessary condition for being a first-class >

Hi I actually had this same problem when running up samba originally. Check that the user has a valid unix acount and that you have added that to the folder share/valid users section. B -----Original Message----- From: Tony Ricker [mailto:rickera2@SLU.EDU] Sent: Friday, 15 March 2002 5:21 AM To: David Brodbeck Cc: Samba Subject: Re: [Samba] Some users can't log in -- server shows

Hi, I have a multi-isp configuration both on ppp interfaces. As one of them is 32Mbit/s and the other is 8Mbit/s , I have a weight setting of 4 to 1 as in the following providers file entries: vdsl 1 0x10000 - ppp1 - track,balance=4 adsl 2 0x20000 - ppp0 - track,balance=1 I would also like to have fallback between them so that if one is