search for: bugaboos

On 31/12/17 16:44, Peter Moody wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:47 PM, David Newall<openssh at davidnewall.com> wrote: >> Of course it's the client's fault. The client worked, was changed, and thus >> stopped working. > don't upgrade your client. problem solved. you're at fault for not > pinning your dependencies when you have hard dependencies.

...ans that Clang will always be behind the curve on Windows, since, even if MSVC++ ABI support is fully usable one day, no one will be willing to link it with object files from a new major version of MSVC without some critical mass of users being guinea pigs first and ensuring that there are no major bugaboos. I agree that there is value in supporting implementing full MSVC++ ABI, if it can be done, but it seems like that support can never be 100% complete (or, more to the point, known to be 100% complete) unless Microsoft itself decides to officially support the implementation or completely stabilize...

...the curve on Windows, since, >> even if MSVC++ ABI support is fully usable one day, no one will be >> willing to link it with object files from a new major version of MSVC >> without some critical mass of users being guinea pigs first and >> ensuring that there are no major bugaboos. >> >> I agree that there is value in supporting implementing full MSVC++ >> ABI, if it can be done, but it seems like that support can never be >> 100% complete (or, more to the point, known to be 100% complete) >> unless Microsoft itself decides to officially support...

...always be behind the curve on Windows, since, > even if MSVC++ ABI support is fully usable one day, no one will be > willing to link it with object files from a new major version of MSVC > without some critical mass of users being guinea pigs first and > ensuring that there are no major bugaboos. > > I agree that there is value in supporting implementing full MSVC++ > ABI, if it can be done, but it seems like that support can never be > 100% complete (or, more to the point, known to be 100% complete) > unless Microsoft itself decides to officially support the > implement...

I have a friend who has been having an intermittent problem with his nice, shiny new IBM x226 server. It's a Xeon processor, 1.5Gb RAM, hardware RAID controller running CentOS 3 The system will will sometimes run for a couple of weeks, then simply lock up -- nothing on the console, no response to pings, no "caps-lock" lights, no kernel panic indicators, nothing in the logs to

Hi, On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 07:52:26AM -0800, Peter Moody wrote: > I would prefer that: > > * commercial vendors patched the software they sold > * people who purchased from these vendors to take responsibility for > their actions and apply pressure on the commercial vendors rather than > the free software developers who provide the client software, for > free. You *are*

On 02/01/18 02:22, Peter Moody wrote: > I would prefer that: > > * commercial vendors patched the software they sold We all would prefer that, but I think you know that in reality, very few customers have enough leverage to achieve that.? I have a number of IBM servers for which access to the remote console now requires old versions of Java and old browsers.? That's IBM.? If

...s, since, > >> even if MSVC++ ABI support is fully usable one day, no one will be > >> willing to link it with object files from a new major version of MSVC > >> without some critical mass of users being guinea pigs first and > >> ensuring that there are no major bugaboos. > >> > >> I agree that there is value in supporting implementing full MSVC++ > >> ABI, if it can be done, but it seems like that support can never be > >> 100% complete (or, more to the point, known to be 100% complete) > >> unless Microsoft itself deci...

Charles Davis <cdavis5x at gmail.com> writes: > Huh? Intel CC supports the MSVC++ ABI. Zortech (Digital Mars) supports > it, too (though the guy who wrote it isn't too proud of that fact--or > the fact that he even wrote that compiler to begin with). Heck, even > CodeWarrior supported it (as Howard Hinnant might well remember), > before Metrowerks sold off their x86

On Jul 30, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Stephen Lin wrote: >> Right. What's the point of all the effort devoted to MSVC++ ABI >> compatibility when Clang doesn't need it for being a top-notch C++ >> compiler on Windows? > > I brought up a similar point a little bit earlier, too.... > > It seems like the only necessary condition for being a first-class >

Hi I actually had this same problem when running up samba originally. Check that the user has a valid unix acount and that you have added that to the folder share/valid users section. B -----Original Message----- From: Tony Ricker [mailto:rickera2@SLU.EDU] Sent: Friday, 15 March 2002 5:21 AM To: David Brodbeck Cc: Samba Subject: Re: [Samba] Some users can't log in -- server shows

Hi, I have a multi-isp configuration both on ppp interfaces. As one of them is 32Mbit/s and the other is 8Mbit/s , I have a weight setting of 4 to 1 as in the following providers file entries: vdsl 1 0x10000 - ppp1 - track,balance=4 adsl 2 0x20000 - ppp0 - track,balance=1 I would also like to have fallback between them so that if one is