Displaying 20 results from an estimated 638 matches for "buddys".
Did you mean:
buddy
2006 Feb 27
4
2 belongs_to to the same parent table
Hello!
I have 2 table: users and buddies
User: id, name, ...
Buddy: id, user_id, user_buddy_id, ...
So if you have 2 users 1,jack and 2,fred and fred is a buddy of jack,
there is a Buddy object: id=1, user_id=1, user_buddy_id=2
I can declare only one belongs_to in Buddy and one has_many in User. And
there is conflict if I had the second one (the first one is discarded)
class User
has_many
2007 Jan 18
1
RE: Polycom buddies question
A follow up (late better than never)
Finally had time to sit down and look at this
sip.cfg
<keys key.scrolling.timeout="1"
key.IP_500.31.function.prim="BuddyStatus"/>
This turns the Services key which I never use on a 501 into the Buddy
Status. It even works while on a call. One touch!
Bill
________________________________
From: Bill Gibbs
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 2:24 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commerc...
2006 Dec 07
2
Polycom buddies question
I know this is not asterisk specific but we all know this group is used
for Polycom issues as well...
I have hints working ok on Asterisk. However the Polycom phone will
only show the buddies key if there is not a call. This defeats the
purpose of using the buddies to see if you can transfer a call to
another extension (using the Buddy key to see if they are on the phone).
Polycom sip
2008 Jul 15
3
Bug-buddy and bug reports for GNOME 2.16...
There seems to be some hostility to the idea of this being a GNOME or
Evolution problem:
Bug 542280 ? Refuses to report bugs because gnome 2.16.x is too old
View Bug Activity
Product: bug-buddy
Component: general
Version: 2.16.x
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: WONTFIX
Opened by Mark Hull-Richter (reporter, points: 3)
2008-07-09 23:40 UTC [reply]
On CentOS 5.2 (and 5.1 and 5.0, and Red Hat
2005 Jan 04
6
Polycom Buddy Feature
Greetings,
Recently there has been talk of the presence/buddy feature with asterisk
and Polycom phones. I have it setup, and working as expected, however I
can only get 7 buddies to appear on the screen at any given time.
Has anyone gotten more than 7 buddies to appear? I'm just trying to find
out if this is some polycom limitation, bug, or my error.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Gibson
VOIP
2006 Jan 12
0
HABTM with conditional field in relation table
Hi all
I have members in my application, and every member can assign other
members as buddies.
class Member < ActiveRecord::Base
# Hat folgende Buddies
has_and_belongs_to_many :buddies,
:class_name => ''Member'',
:join_table => ''members_have_buddies'',
2006 Jun 19
4
Polycom Buddies in 1.6.6
All,
Slightly off topic.
Polycom released their SIP software version 1.6.6 for their phones recently. I was under the impression that this release fixed a previous limitation where the phones would only watch 7 buddies, ie send 7 sip subscriptions to Asterisk. I have configured a phone directory to watch 30 or so appearances, and it still seems to only be sending 7 subscriptions to Asterisk.
2016 Apr 05
2
[PATCH v3 01/16] mm: use put_page to free page instead of putback_lru_page
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
...
> >>>
> >>> Also (but not your fault) the put_page() preceding
> >>> test_set_page_hwpoison(page)) IMHO deserves a comment saying which
> >>> pin we are
2016 Apr 05
2
[PATCH v3 01/16] mm: use put_page to free page instead of putback_lru_page
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
...
> >>>
> >>> Also (but not your fault) the put_page() preceding
> >>> test_set_page_hwpoison(page)) IMHO deserves a comment saying which
> >>> pin we are
2007 Jan 23
2
Asterisk 1.4 & Polycom buddy status
I'm running into an issue w/ Buddy status on Polycom IP650 phones using
buddy status (with SIP Hints) on Asterisk 1.4. Sometimes the status on the
phones will "stick" in the busy status. I have noticed that I can call that
extension & the status will reset (sometimes). Anyone else encountered this
or anything similar.
-Chris
2006 Jan 11
4
Member.buddies.sort >> undefined method `<=>''
Hi all
I have a model Member that has a habtm relationship to buddies (also
members).
Now I wanted to sort them using sort, but this ends in an error
"undefined method <=>"! Where''s the problem here? Sorry, I''m still
beginning to learn Ruby. ;-)
Thanks
Josh
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2006 Jan 09
6
has_and_belongs_to_many :self
Hi all
I got the following class:
class Member < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :buddies,
:class_name => ''Member'',
:join_table => ''members_have_buddies'',
:foreign_key => ''member_id'',
:association_foreign_key =>
2006 Aug 02
2
Self-Referential has_many :through
Hello all.
I am trying to create a self-referential has_many :through. I used the
following site as a guide
http://blog.hasmanythrough.com/articles/2006/04/21/self-referential-through
but it still doesn''t appear to be working. I have two models. Person and
Relationship. A person has many contacts (Which is another person)
through relationships
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
2016 Apr 06
1
[PATCH v3 01/16] mm: use put_page to free page instead of putback_lru_page
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:20:50AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 03:54 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
2016 Apr 06
1
[PATCH v3 01/16] mm: use put_page to free page instead of putback_lru_page
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:20:50AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 03:54 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
2019 Oct 22
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
On Fri 18-10-19 14:35:06, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 18.10.19 13:20, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > > > for that - MEM_GOING_OFFLINE notification. This sounds like a good place
> > > > for the driver to decide whether it is safe to let the page go or not.
2019 Oct 22
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
On Fri 18-10-19 14:35:06, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 18.10.19 13:20, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > > > for that - MEM_GOING_OFFLINE notification. This sounds like a good place
> > > > for the driver to decide whether it is safe to let the page go or not.
2019 Oct 18
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when
> > > > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the
2019 Oct 18
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when
> > > > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the
2012 Sep 11
1
multiple users for jabber.conf
Hi all,
Been reading about chan_motif / chan_xmpp in the wiki's for 1.8, 10 and
11 version of asterisk.
In each example i got the impression that the asterisk server is
registering on a XMPP server as a single user with the credentials as
specified in jabber.conf.
Instead of a single xmpp-user, could that also be multiple users?
For instance, for each sip-user an xmpp-user?
When i skim