search for: buddy

Hello! I have 2 table: users and buddies User: id, name, ... Buddy: id, user_id, user_buddy_id, ... So if you have 2 users 1,jack and 2,fred and fred is a buddy of jack, there is a Buddy object: id=1, user_id=1, user_buddy_id=2 I can declare only one belongs_to in Buddy and one has_many in User. And there is conflict if I had the second one (the first one is...

A follow up (late better than never) Finally had time to sit down and look at this sip.cfg <keys key.scrolling.timeout="1" key.IP_500.31.function.prim="BuddyStatus"/> This turns the Services key which I never use on a 501 into the Buddy Status. It even works while on a call. One touch! Bill ________________________________ From: Bill Gibbs Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 2:24 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commer...

...ut we all know this group is used for Polycom issues as well... I have hints working ok on Asterisk. However the Polycom phone will only show the buddies key if there is not a call. This defeats the purpose of using the buddies to see if you can transfer a call to another extension (using the Buddy key to see if they are on the phone). Polycom sip version: 1.6.6.0036 for all platforms except 11402_001 1.6.6.0042 for 11402_001 Any way around this? The big issue is moving from a key system to this is the ability to use the phone to see who is on the phone so you know if you can t...

There seems to be some hostility to the idea of this being a GNOME or Evolution problem: Bug 542280 ? Refuses to report bugs because gnome 2.16.x is too old View Bug Activity Product: bug-buddy Component: general Version: 2.16.x Status: RESOLVED Resolution: WONTFIX Opened by Mark Hull-Richter (reporter, points: 3) 2008-07-09 23:40 UTC [reply] On CentOS 5.2 (and 5.1 and 5.0, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux of the same versions, which happen to be the most current ones available), the bug...

Greetings, Recently there has been talk of the presence/buddy feature with asterisk and Polycom phones. I have it setup, and working as expected, however I can only get 7 buddies to appear on the screen at any given time. Has anyone gotten more than 7 buddies to appear? I'm just trying to find out if this is some polycom limitation, bug, or my error....

...eRecord::Base # Hat folgende Buddies has_and_belongs_to_many :buddies, :class_name => ''Member'', :join_table => ''members_have_buddies'', :association_foreign_key => ''buddy_id'', :order => ''username'' # Ist Buddy von has_and_belongs_to_many :buddy_of, :class_name => ''Member'', :join_table => ''members_have_buddies'',...

All, Slightly off topic. Polycom released their SIP software version 1.6.6 for their phones recently. I was under the impression that this release fixed a previous limitation where the phones would only watch 7 buddies, ie send 7 sip subscriptions to Asterisk. I have configured a phone directory to watch 30 or so appearances, and it still seems to only be sending 7 subscriptions to Asterisk.

...for in-use hwpoisoned pages is fragile. That's why I'd like to avoid setting PageHWPoison for in-use pages if possible. > (Also, which part prevents pages with PageHWPoison to be allocated > again, anyway? I can't find it and test_set_page_hwpoison() doesn't > remove from buddy freelists). check_new_page() in mm/page_alloc.c should prevent reallocation of PageHWPoison. As you pointed out, memory error handler doens't remove it from buddy freelists. BTW, it might be a bit off-topic, but recently I felt that check_new_page() might be improvable, because when check_ne...

...for in-use hwpoisoned pages is fragile. That's why I'd like to avoid setting PageHWPoison for in-use pages if possible. > (Also, which part prevents pages with PageHWPoison to be allocated > again, anyway? I can't find it and test_set_page_hwpoison() doesn't > remove from buddy freelists). check_new_page() in mm/page_alloc.c should prevent reallocation of PageHWPoison. As you pointed out, memory error handler doens't remove it from buddy freelists. BTW, it might be a bit off-topic, but recently I felt that check_new_page() might be improvable, because when check_ne...

I'm running into an issue w/ Buddy status on Polycom IP650 phones using buddy status (with SIP Hints) on Asterisk 1.4. Sometimes the status on the phones will "stick" in the busy status. I have noticed that I can call that extension & the status will reset (sometimes). Anyone else encountered this or anything simila...

Hi all I have a model Member that has a habtm relationship to buddies (also members). Now I wanted to sort them using sort, but this ends in an error "undefined method <=>"! Where''s the problem here? Sorry, I''m still beginning to learn Ruby. ;-) Thanks Josh -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...:class_name => ''Member'', :join_table => ''members_have_buddies'', :foreign_key => ''member_id'', :association_foreign_key => ''buddy_id'' end You can see that a member can have any other member as a "buddy"; these relationships are held in the table members_have_buddies (member_id, buddy_id). So far, so good. I have a member "my_member", that has 3 other members marked as buddies, so I got 3 entr...

Hello all. I am trying to create a self-referential has_many :through. I used the following site as a guide http://blog.hasmanythrough.com/articles/2006/04/21/self-referential-through but it still doesn''t appear to be working. I have two models. Person and Relationship. A person has many contacts (Which is another person) through relationships class Person < ActiveRecord::Base

...gt; That's why I'd like to avoid setting PageHWPoison for in-use pages if possible. > > > >> (Also, which part prevents pages with PageHWPoison to be allocated > >> again, anyway? I can't find it and test_set_page_hwpoison() doesn't > >> remove from buddy freelists). > > > > check_new_page() in mm/page_alloc.c should prevent reallocation of PageHWPoison. > > As you pointed out, memory error handler doens't remove it from buddy freelists. > > Oh, I see. It's using __PG_HWPOISON wrapper, so I didn't notice it when...

...gt; That's why I'd like to avoid setting PageHWPoison for in-use pages if possible. > > > >> (Also, which part prevents pages with PageHWPoison to be allocated > >> again, anyway? I can't find it and test_set_page_hwpoison() doesn't > >> remove from buddy freelists). > > > > check_new_page() in mm/page_alloc.c should prevent reallocation of PageHWPoison. > > As you pointed out, memory error handler doens't remove it from buddy freelists. > > Oh, I see. It's using __PG_HWPOISON wrapper, so I didn't notice it when...

...tion or fail right there if that is not possible. If you fail right there during the isolation phase then there is no way to allow the offlining to proceed from that context. > > > 2) memory_notify(MEM_GOING_OFFLINE, &arg); > > > -> Here, we could release all pages to the buddy, clearing PG_offline > > > -> PF_offline must not be cleared so dumping tools will not touch > > > these pages. There is a time where pages are !PageBuddy() and > > > !PageOffline(). > > > > Well, this is fully under control of the driver, no? Refe...

...tion or fail right there if that is not possible. If you fail right there during the isolation phase then there is no way to allow the offlining to proceed from that context. > > > 2) memory_notify(MEM_GOING_OFFLINE, &arg); > > > -> Here, we could release all pages to the buddy, clearing PG_offline > > > -> PF_offline must not be cleared so dumping tools will not touch > > > these pages. There is a time where pages are !PageBuddy() and > > > !PageOffline(). > > > > Well, this is fully under control of the driver, no? Refe...

...But I believe that you can achieve > > the same with an elevated reference count and have a more robust design > > as well. > > Thanks for thinking about this. I still believe it is problematic. And I > don't like releasing "pages that should not be used" to the buddy. It comes > with some problems if offlining fails (see below). Sure I will not be pushing if that turns out to be unfeasible. But I would like to explore that path before giving up on it. [...] > > An elevated reference count would prevent offlining to finish. And I > > believe th...

...But I believe that you can achieve > > the same with an elevated reference count and have a more robust design > > as well. > > Thanks for thinking about this. I still believe it is problematic. And I > don't like releasing "pages that should not be used" to the buddy. It comes > with some problems if offlining fails (see below). Sure I will not be pushing if that turns out to be unfeasible. But I would like to explore that path before giving up on it. [...] > > An elevated reference count would prevent offlining to finish. And I > > believe th...

Hi all, Been reading about chan_motif / chan_xmpp in the wiki's for 1.8, 10 and 11 version of asterisk. In each example i got the impression that the asterisk server is registering on a XMPP server as a single user with the credentials as specified in jabber.conf. Instead of a single xmpp-user, could that also be multiple users? For instance, for each sip-user an xmpp-user? When i skim