search for: buddi

Hello! I have 2 table: users and buddies User: id, name, ... Buddy: id, user_id, user_buddy_id, ... So if you have 2 users 1,jack and 2,fred and fred is a buddy of jack, there is a Buddy object: id=1, user_id=1, user_buddy_id=2 I can declare only one belongs_to in Buddy and one has_many in User. And there is conflict if I had the s...

...ces key which I never use on a 501 into the Buddy Status. It even works while on a call. One touch! Bill ________________________________ From: Bill Gibbs Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 2:24 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: Polycom buddies question Figures I email this and realized I can hit Menu 1 (Features) 4 (Presence) 2 (Buddy Status) Wow that's a lot of key strokes. Anyway to reduce that to a one button touch? I don't mind doing that but I guess I should think of the users :-) Bill ___________...

I know this is not asterisk specific but we all know this group is used for Polycom issues as well... I have hints working ok on Asterisk. However the Polycom phone will only show the buddies key if there is not a call. This defeats the purpose of using the buddies to see if you can transfer a call to another extension (using the Buddy key to see if they are on the phone). Polycom sip version: 1.6.6.0036 for all platforms except 11402_001 1.6.6.0042 for 11402_001 Any way a...

There seems to be some hostility to the idea of this being a GNOME or Evolution problem: Bug 542280 ? Refuses to report bugs because gnome 2.16.x is too old View Bug Activity Product: bug-buddy Component: general Version: 2.16.x Status: RESOLVED Resolution: WONTFIX Opened by Mark Hull-Richter (reporter, points: 3) 2008-07-09 23:40 UTC [reply] On CentOS 5.2 (and 5.1 and 5.0, and Red Hat

Greetings, Recently there has been talk of the presence/buddy feature with asterisk and Polycom phones. I have it setup, and working as expected, however I can only get 7 buddies to appear on the screen at any given time. Has anyone gotten more than 7 buddies to appear? I'm just trying to find out if this is some polycom limitation, bug, or my error. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Gibson VOIP Administrator NJ Tech Solutions 1.314.480.4550 ex. 6400 1.877.999.4678 ex. 6400

Hi all I have members in my application, and every member can assign other members as buddies. class Member < ActiveRecord::Base # Hat folgende Buddies has_and_belongs_to_many :buddies, :class_name => ''Member'', :join_table => ''members_have_buddies'', :association_...

All, Slightly off topic. Polycom released their SIP software version 1.6.6 for their phones recently. I was under the impression that this release fixed a previous limitation where the phones would only watch 7 buddies, ie send 7 sip subscriptions to Asterisk. I have configured a phone directory to watch 30 or so appearances, and it still seems to only be sending 7 subscriptions to Asterisk. Has anyone else got this to work? Doug.

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: ... > >>> > >>> Also (but not your fault) the put_page() preceding > >>> test_set_page_hwpoison(page)) IMHO deserves a comment saying which > >>> pin we are

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: ... > >>> > >>> Also (but not your fault) the put_page() preceding > >>> test_set_page_hwpoison(page)) IMHO deserves a comment saying which > >>> pin we are

I'm running into an issue w/ Buddy status on Polycom IP650 phones using buddy status (with SIP Hints) on Asterisk 1.4. Sometimes the status on the phones will "stick" in the busy status. I have noticed that I can call that extension & the status will reset (sometimes). Anyone else encountered this or anything similar. -Chris

Hi all I have a model Member that has a habtm relationship to buddies (also members). Now I wanted to sort them using sort, but this ends in an error "undefined method <=>"! Where''s the problem here? Sorry, I''m still beginning to learn Ruby. ;-) Thanks Josh -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi all I got the following class: class Member < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :buddies, :class_name => ''Member'', :join_table => ''members_have_buddies'', :foreign_key => ''member_id'', :association_foreign_key => '...

Hello all. I am trying to create a self-referential has_many :through. I used the following site as a guide http://blog.hasmanythrough.com/articles/2006/04/21/self-referential-through but it still doesn''t appear to be working. I have two models. Person and Relationship. A person has many contacts (Which is another person) through relationships class Person < ActiveRecord::Base

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:20:50AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/05/2016 03:54 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > ... > >>>>> > >>>>>

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:20:50AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/05/2016 03:54 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > ... > >>>>> > >>>>>

On Fri 18-10-19 14:35:06, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.10.19 13:20, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > > > for that - MEM_GOING_OFFLINE notification. This sounds like a good place > > > > for the driver to decide whether it is safe to let the page go or not.

On Fri 18-10-19 14:35:06, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.10.19 13:20, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > > > for that - MEM_GOING_OFFLINE notification. This sounds like a good place > > > > for the driver to decide whether it is safe to let the page go or not.

On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote: > > [...] > > > > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when > > > > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the

On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote: > > [...] > > > > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when > > > > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the

Hi all, Been reading about chan_motif / chan_xmpp in the wiki's for 1.8, 10 and 11 version of asterisk. In each example i got the impression that the asterisk server is registering on a XMPP server as a single user with the credentials as specified in jabber.conf. Instead of a single xmpp-user, could that also be multiple users? For instance, for each sip-user an xmpp-user? When i skim