search for: btenison

...]: cos5 (192.168.7.132) connect to service rsession as user rsession (uid=707, gid=100) (pid 11130) Mar 6 18:13:19 gate smbd[11130]: [2000/03/06 18:13:19, 0] smbd/dir.c:dptr_close(280) Mar 6 18:13:19 gate smbd[11130]: Invalid key 256 given to dptr_close Also, I get the following: [root@gate btenison]# smbstatus Samba version pre-3.0.0 Service uid gid pid machine ---------------------------------------------- virus btenison users 9906 tenison (192.168.5.1) Mon Mar 6 16:43:27 2000 virus lalford users 10837 alford (192.168.2.7) Mon Mar 6 17:53:40...

...) Jan 18 18:07:14 gate smbd[5872]: Processing section "[netlogon]" Jan 18 18:07:14 gate smbd[5872]: doing parameter comment = Network Logon Service Jan 18 18:07:14 gate smbd[5872]: doing parameter path = /home/netlogon Jan 18 18:07:14 gate smbd[5872]: doing parameter admin users = btenison brucet goober tenison Jan 18 18:07:14 gate smbd[5872]: doing parameter write list = btenison brucet goober tenison Jan 18 18:07:14 gate smbd[5872]: doing parameter browseable = No Jan 18 18:07:14 gate smbd[5872]: doing parameter root preexec = /usr/local/sbin/setipfw %u %I %m Jan 18 18:07:14...

Hello, If you don?t want (Who wants ?) to save roaming profiles under Winnt\Profiles, than you have to change, or create (if not exist) a registry string: Run regedt32.exe and locate the key entry: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Microsoft\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon Add (or change) the following string: DeleteRoamingCache Standard value is 0, it has to be 1 All the Best. --

...amba.anu.edu.au> Subject: CVS update: samba/source/lib/rpc/server Date: Thursday April 30, 1998 @ 11:39 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib/rpc/server In directory samba:/tmp/cvs-serv91/lib/rpc/server Modified Files: srv_netlog.c Log Message: Added patch from Bruce Tenison <btenison@dibbs.net> to allow encrypted passwords to be stored over time, allowing a smbpasswd file migration. Adds new parameter "update encrypted". Will also add to 1.9.18 branch. Docs update to follow. Jeremy.

Hi, I have referred to the archive and some of you were having the oplock_break problem. Does anyone have any solution for this? Will reboot fix the problem? Please advise. regards, Bridget

...st have to reinstall 2.0). Are there any ideas about how to fix this (is it a bug, or is it my configuration???) It seems strange to me that 1.9.18pl10 works fine and 2.0 doesn't with the same smb.conf (minus the minor unrelated changes that we made for 2.0) Any ideas? Thanks! Bruce Tenison btenison@dibbs.net All the world's a stage, and we are merely players

On Mon, 18 Jan 1999 samba@samba.org wrote: > Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 14:55:42 +0730 (SST) > From: Gregory Hosler <gregory.hosler@eno.ericsson.se> > To: samba@samba.org, samba-bugs@samba.org, btenison@dibbs.net > Subject: request_oplock_break - a clue - what does it mean ? > Message-ID: <XFMail.990117145542.gregory.hosler@eno.ericsson.se> > > Hi all, > > I increased the log level, and found something very interesting out. > I know now what causes a sbmd to go into in...

btenison@dibbs.net wrote: > > I keep getting the following in the log files now that we've upgraded to > the latest cvs 2.0 branch. Any ideas what we can do to fix this? > > Mar 23 08:45:34 gate smbd[22692]: [1999/03/23 08:45:34, 0] > smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(773) > Mar 23 08:4...

...h file or directory) Here's the snippet of the homes section of the smb.conf [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /home/%U/profile read only = No create mask = 0750 browseable = No oplocks = No Any ideas? Thanks! Bruce -- Bruce Tenison btenison@dibbs.net Public Key available at: http://www.keyserver.net

...this function) smbd/trans2.c:2153: `params' undeclared (first use in this function) smbd/trans2.c:2159: `reply_size' undeclared (first use in this function) smbd/trans2.c:2159: `max_referral_level' undeclared (first use in this function) make: *** [smbd/trans2.o] Error 1 Bruce Tenison btenison@dibbs.net Public Key available at: http://www.keyserver.net

Has anyone had any success in getting Samba to correctly restart logging to the log files with the default logrotate setup (or even a modified one) from RedHat? The default setup is to move the files to another location, create a new file for Samba to fill, then send the daemons a HUP signal. I've tried some of the options that can be used in the logrotate.d/samba file (nocreate and

..., as I can see when accessing the "normal" (user-related and password-protected) shares. Any help is highly appreciated! Thanks, Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: <btenison@earthlink.net> Delivered-To: samba@samba.org Received: from gate.rstc.cc.al.us (gate.rstc.cc.al.us [207.157.90.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AD1469E for <samba@samba.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tenison (tenison.irstc.cc.al.us [192.168.5...

I keep getting the following in the log files now that we've upgraded to the latest cvs 2.0 branch. Any ideas what we can do to fix this? Thanks! Bruce Mar 23 08:45:34 gate smbd[22692]: [1999/03/23 08:45:34, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(773) Mar 23 08:45:34 gate smbd[22692]: oplock_break: end of file from client Mar 23 08:45:34 gate smbd[22692]: oplock_break failed for file COMM.INF

Should I be concerned about getting the [1998/12/18 07:15:07, 0] lib/doscalls.c:dos_GetWd(405) Very strange, couldn't stat "." error in the logs? I've noticed that it is occuring in some of the log files for users and not in others. I've looked in the source as to where this is occuring and added a path=%s\n",path to the DEBUG line to maybe see which UNIX directory

Hi! Been having the same problem with oplocks for a while and have been trying to figure out what's going wrong. The FAQ says that we may have a networking (hardware?) problem, but according to the Linux box's ifconfig results, we have had no errors and no dropped packets on the internal network. I am able to reproduce the error pretty much at will on our network, and it is not isolated