search for: brody

Thanks Brodie, that's some nice detective work. If someone wanted to grant me access to Bugzilla, I'll be happy to post the bug and patch there (with your permission Brodie?) and help this bug get fixed. Mike. On Tue., 25 Sep. 2018, 10:53 pm brodie gaslam, <brodie.gaslam at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > For what it's worth the following patch fixes that particular problem

RHEL5 has autoconf 2.59 and automake 1.9.6. I've managed to build the whole Xapian family by reducing the requirement to 2.59/1.9.6 in configure.ac. Omega requires docdir which can be added by hand in docs/Makefile.am: docdir = ${datadir}/doc/${PACKAGE} if !MAINTAINER_NO_DOCS dist_doc_DATA = $(RSTHTML) endif All I've done is get these packages compiled - I haven't tested in any

Carrying on this conversation: http://lists.tartarus.org/pipermail/xapian-discuss/2007-March/003513.html void TermGenerator::set_stopper(stopper) Stopper * stopper CODE: // FIXME: no corresponding SvREFCNT_dec(), but a leak seems better than // a SEGV! SvREFCNT_inc(ST(1)); THIS->set_stopper(stopper); It would be good to fix these FIXMEs. A class-level HASH could be

> On Friday, March 6, 2020, 8:56:54 AM EST, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > Note that the? * -> LaTex -> PDF rendered version looks a bitnicer. Ah yes, that does indeed look quite a bit nicer. > I wrote the function and that help page originally. And thank you for doing so. It is a wonderful function. (0 sarcasm here). > For that reason,

Hello :-) The instructions regards Tim Brody's packages are incomplete in that rpm-eprints-org-key is needed by rpm-eprints-org-xapian-5-1.noarch. The RPM for rpm-eprints-org-key is at http://rpm.eprints.org/rpm-eprints-org-key-1-1.noarch.rpm Best Charles

On 27 November 2016 at 13:20, Duncan Murdoch wrote: | On 27/11/2016 11:34 AM, brodie gaslam via R-devel wrote: | > Minor issue, but the following changed as of R3.3.2 from: | > | > > a <- function() b() | > > a() | > Error in a() : could not find function "b" | > | > To (at least in R Under development (unstable) (2016-11-20 r71670)): | > |

I've found over time that R documentation that comes off as terse at first blush is usually revealed to be precise, concise, and complete on close reading.? I'm sure this is also true of `?findInterval`, but for whatever reason my brain simply refuses to extract meaning from it. Part of the problem may be that we interact with the function via a compressed form of the bounds of the

> On Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 7:00:09 AM EDT, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > Expected, see FAQ 7.31. > > You just can't trust == on FP operations. Notice also Additionally, since you're implementing a "mean" function you are testing against R's mean, you might want to consider that R uses a two-pass calculation[1] to reduce floating

I think there is a memory bug in `substr` that is triggered by a UTF-8 corner case: an incomplete UTF-8 byte sequence at the end of a string.? With a valgrind level 2 instrumented build of R-devel I get: > string <- "abc\xEE"??? # \xEE indicates the start of a 3 byte UTF-8 sequence > Encoding(string) <- "UTF-8" > substr(string, 1, 10) ==15375== Invalid read of

Hi All, When are the XS-based Perl bindings going to be deprecated in favour of the SWIG bindings? Please remove the dead RHEL RPMs from: http://xapian.org/download I've built RPMs for RHEL5/CentOS5 (with a different signing key) here: http://rpm.eprints.org/xapian/5/ RHEL4 is eol and shouldn't be used. For my own convenience I have written an RPM for the repository: rpm -ivh

In 1.4 Contexts[1], should the following: > Note that whilst calls to closures and builtins set a context, > those to special internal functions never do. Be something like: > Note that whilst calls to closures always set a context, > those to builtins only set a context under profiling > or if they are of the foreign variety (e.g `.C` and similar), > and those to special

(Forwarded off-list message) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Xapian-discuss] what is the fastest way to fetch results which are sorted by timestamp ? Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:06:36 +0800 From: ??? <panjunyong at gmail.com> To: Tim Brody <tdb2 at ecs.soton.ac.uk> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Tim Brody <tdb2 at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > In terms of the enquiry, do you mean this?: > set_weighting_scheme(Xapian::BoolWeight()); > set_docid_order(Xapian::Enquire::DESCENDING); > > In my test...

We also have a few other suggestions and wishes about backtrace storage and display on the one hand, and display of constructed calls on the other hand. Perhaps it would be better to open a different wishlist item for traceback() to keep the discussions focused? FWIW I think deparsing backtraces lazily is a great idea. Displaying 1 line per call by default in interactive sessions, while being

Luke, thanks for considering the issue.? I would like to try to separate the problem into two parts, as I _think_ your comments address primarily part 2 below: 1. How can we avoid significant and possibly crippling ?? stalls on error with these non-standard calls. 2. What is the best way to view these non-standard calls. I agree that issue 2. requires further thought and discussion under a

Minor issue, but the following changed as of R3.3.2 from: > a <- function() b() > a() Error in a() : could not find function "b" To (at least in R Under development (unstable) (2016-11-20 r71670)): Error in b() : could not find function "b" Notice the "Error in **b**() :" part. The original error message seems more correct to me, although

Hello, The CRAN checks for the drake package (4.1.0) fail for r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang. This happened right when crayon 1.3.4 was released, but I suspect the problem is not with crayon or drake, but with base R-devel. I cannot reproduce the error myself, but I have copied a minimal working example (MWE) below that should theoretically isolate the problem. `find_namespaced_functions()`

Hi there, using cbind with a numeric and raw argument produces an incorrect result. I've posted some details below, kind regards, Mike. e.g. > cbind(0, as.raw(0)) [,1] [,2] [1,] 0 6.950136e-310 A longer example shows that the result is not a rounding error, is not consistent, and repeated applications get different results. > cbind(0, as.raw(1:10))

I ran into an interesting issue with `evalq` (and also `eval(quote(...))`): ???? f <- function() { ?????? list( ???????? sys.parent(1), ???????? evalq(sys.parent(1)), ???????? evalq((function() sys.parent(2))()),? # add an anon fun layer ???????? evalq((function() sys.parent(1))()) ?????? ) ???? } ???? res <- f() ???? str(res) ???? ## List of 4 ???? ##? $ : int 0???????? # sys.parent(1)

I'm about ready to pull my teeth out over this. I just installed Red Hat 8.0, have not used Linux much in the past, which is why I went with Red Hat, sposeto be easier, more support etc. The network the Linux box resides in has 2 WinXP-home computers, and a Win200 Pro computer. They are all sharing all files, no passwords, no domain, just a workgroup called "ESR". I just want the

Thank you to all who helped me with this problem. I am now convinced the problem is not just something wrong in the smb.conf file, but must be more of a port deny issue or something. Couple of questions: Do all XP computers (including XP home?) need the 'plain-password-hack' to talk to a Samba server? Remember XP Home is different than XP Pro, XP Home can not join a domain, more like