search for: bridge2

...already a member of a bridge; can't enslave= it to bridge Net6" = Is this a bug or a feature? Why is it not allowed to bind an Interface to t= wo different bridges? = Is there a workaround for this issue? Problem: = UML1 ---- bridge1 \ eth0 = UML2 ---- bridge2 / Workaround?: UML1 ---- bridge1 \ bridge3 ---- eth0 UML2 ---- bridge2 / UML1 \ bridge1 ---- eth0 UML2 / Thanks for your help Tim Keupen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundat...

Hi, I have a bridge firewall already working with 2 eth. I need to set up a another eth to do NAT like http://www.shorewall.net/images/bridge2.png The question is (using the same notation as the image), I need to put a 192.168.0.2.X in the eth1 and act as the bridged part (not use Nat). It is possible ? Thanks in advance. PS : I''m not subscribe to the list. Please reply to my address. David Sedeño

...------| | |__________ | | | ____________ | |-----BALBLA |VM2 | |VM4 | |__________ |-----------------bridge2------------------ |Firewall| ____________ | | |VM3 | | | |__________ |-----------------bridge3------------------ |________| is one-bridge-per-VLAN Thanks my so is d...

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Daniel Journo <dan at keshercommunications.com> wrote: > > Prior to a call entering a Queue, I set __DYNAMIC_FEATURES=NewRecordApp. > > AgentA answers and is able to use that feature code. > > If AgentA performs an attended transfer of a call from a queue to > AgentB, the > > feature code no longer works. > > > > It only

...onnected to VLAN'ed Cisco switches using linux bridge. I'm testing the following setup (Kernel 2.6.19, bridge-utils 1.2 on both bridges) http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r293/mrennt/BridgeProblem.jpg The diagram shows how everything is setup. I'm not happy with the block of eth0 on BRIDGE2, although I'm able to reach the IP configured on the bridge interface, I'm not sure if this is the correct STP behaviour, because eth0 is blocked, thus it shouldn't respond!? Both Cisco switches (2950) have VLANs 1,10,20,31,32,33,34,50 configured. Here's what I've done so far:...

...| | | | | ant1.1 |---| ant2.1 | |________| |________| _________ | | _________ | |-eth1-+ +--eth1-| | lan1 --eth0-| bridge1 | | bridge2 |-eth0--lan2 |_________|-eth2-+ +--eth2-|_________| ____|___ ____|___ | | | | | ant1.2 |---| ant2.2 | |________| |________| Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld A...

Deep in the discussion of this bug, unfortunately mostly in private comments: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594515 we decided it'd be more flexible for RHV if we had a way to map individual NICs to target networks and bridges. This can be done by adding a new --mac option so you can specify the exact mapping you need: $ virt-v2v [...] \ --mac

...t@samba.org > Return-Path: <Daniyal.Shamsie@comverse.com> Delivered-To: samba@samba.org Received: from ns2.comverse.com (unknown [63.64.185.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A435394 for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bridge2.btrd.bostontechnology.com (host.comversens.com [63.64.185.2]) by ns2.comverse.com (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f6DKAhs22088 for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:10:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-bridge2.btrd.bostontechnology.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id &lt...

Since v3: - A large number of fixes, especially for running the tests on installed libguestfs. - Fixed EXTRA_DIST rules throughout. - Extra patch 17/17 which is a tidy-up of the generated XML listing guests. Rich.