search for: breakers

For the mailing list archive and for anyone else interested. A few years ago we needed to automatically run a second AGI if the first AGI failed i.e. a "failsafe" setup. Mainly because I'm not a very good programmer. 8-| The code below is very similar to what we use in production. This code is also at http://pastebin.com/LBaLhdfJ for a while. "sm" stands for Switch

On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 05:50:22PM +0100, Robert Stepanek wrote: > Since I am undecided yet if and how to fix this in Xapian I haven't > come up with a pull request. Because trac currently is offline, I > could not file a bug. I hope it's OK to post my analysis here first, > I'll be happy to follow up reporting that bug proper later (should we > conclude that it actually

On Sun, Jan 7, 2024, at 7:45 PM, Olly Betts wrote: > I've restarted trac. I now created a pull request: https://github.com/xapian/xapian/pull/329 Should I create a trac issue, too? > Assuming the latter is valid, just removing this block (or removing the > parts of it which are Lu or Ll) should fix the problem as then > tokenisation will switch mode - I tried this and it fixes

On 19/01/16 18:25, Maxim Vorontsov wrote: > Yazeed, your tun.ko for 3.3.8. Which kernel do you use? > Show your "uname -a". By the way, 3.3.8 seems very old for an OpenWrt kernel. The router I am running tinc on has 3.8.10 and is several years old. I built that image myself but it was based on Barrier Breaker r36499. You may want to find a more recent build -- for example a

Hey Everyone, Just a simple question. I have read and re-read the examples and I''m not getting the proper output. I''m on page 73/74 of the Rspec book and it says I should have "4 steps passed". I think the problem is within my /step_definition/mastermind.rb" file. It''s definitely not beyond me to make a mistake, but I have checked and double checked my

----- Original Message ----- > > > > hi, > I have few question about breaking anti-dependence of postRAScheduler > in LLVM. > when I use command line "clang -target arm -mcpu=cortex-a8 -O2 > -integrated-as -c test.c -o test.o" > and get objdump file as follows: > ldr r1, [r0,#16]----(1 > str r1, [r0,#32]----(2 > ldr r1, [r0,#12]----(3 > str r1,

hi, I have few question about breaking anti-dependence of postRAScheduler in LLVM. when I use command line "clang -target arm -mcpu=cortex-a8 -O2 -integrated-as -c test.c -o test.o" and get objdump file as follows: ldrr1, [r0,#16]----(1 str r1, [r0,#32]----(2 ldr r1, [r0,#12]----(3 str r1, [r0,#36]----(4 ldr r1, [r0,#08]----(5 str r1, [r0,#40]----(6 However, I expect that instruction

I think I found a bug in Xapian 1.5 when using FLAG_WORD_BREAKS for input that contains characters in Unicode Halfwidth and Fullwidth Forms (https://unicode.org/charts/PDF/UFF00.pdf). Since I am undecided yet if and how to fix this in Xapian I haven't come up with a pull request. Because trac currently is offline, I could not file a bug. I hope it's OK to post my analysis here first,

Hello! My name is Emanuel and I am an undergraduate student from Brazil (at the University of São Paulo) wanting to participate in this years GSoC on LLVM. Specifically, on the "Improve parallelism-aware analyses and optimizations" project. I currently do research on autotuning of LLVM IR optimization passes and I am sitting for a class about parallel computing, but I have been studying

Once upon a time, Robert Nichols <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> said: > the lack of VM snapshot capability is a total deal-breaker for me. The capability is still there and works just the same as before. The only change is that the new preferred tool for graphical VM management, Cockpit, doesn't yet support making snapshots. virt-manager is still there for now (presumably until

Hi there, I know it''s not a very construtive question but...=/ what is that IDE in the blog screencast at rubyonrails.com? I couldn''t yet find a very good IDE for Ruby and I really liked that one! =) Thank you... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On May 1, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > The goal is to replace the pattern fragment and the C++ code for > X86::isMOVDDUPMask with something like: > > def movddup : PatFrag<(ops node:$lhs, node:$rhs), > (vector_shuffle node:$lhs, node:$rhs, > 0, 1, 0, 1, Cost<42>) > > Alternatively, the

I'd like to start scanning our boxed up documents. I'd say about 30,000 files total. Mostly to eliminate the boxes of paper we have. I'd like to scan them, store them, Have some sort of index, and be able to retrieve them on multiple machines. I think PDF would be the desired format. I'd like be able to set some permissions as well. (not a deal breaker...) I've searched

Hi, I have a bright, diligent second-year graduate student who wants to learn statistics and R and will, in effect, be taking a tutorial from me on these subjects. (If you've seen some of my questions on this list, please don't laugh.) As an undergrad he majored in philosophy, so this will be his first foray into computer programming and statistics. I'm thinking of having him use

Hi, On 2020-09-30 17:52:46 -0700, Lang Hames wrote: > I've just realised that we're going to need a change to the definition > generator API in the long term: Right now it is called under the session > lock, but we want to shift to calling it outside the lock and passing a > lookup-continuation. This would allow definition discovery to take an > arbitrarily long time

Client: Dual 1GHz G4 OSX 10.2 Gig-Ethernet Server: Dual 2GHz P4 Linux 2.4.18 Raid-5 1TB Gig-Ethernet With netatalk 1.5.5 I get sustained writes of 66MB/s (yes, megabytes) With samba 2.2.7a I get sustained writes of 15MB/s I've tweaked the settings and ended up with these: socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE read raw =

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Chris Lattner" <clattner at apple.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, March 7, 2014 8:07:19 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC - Adding an optimization

...just me, but seems to me that when I moved to rspec, certain things which seemed to be nice default behaviors in test::unit are no longer default. For example this issue, and also that it seems that rspec does not automatically ''set autoeval'' when going into the debugger. Not deal breakers by any means but thought I would see if anyone else has the same comments. Loaded suite test/unit/random_test Started [4, 13] in test/unit/random_test.rb 4 5 def test_this_hahahah 6 a = 1 7 a += 1 8 debugger => 9 assert a == 2 10 end 11 12 1...

I've been struggling with a test * install for a couple months now in a small office and am just about ready to give up on it. It's not that the system itself is a problem. I've got everything (attendant, voicemail, FXS extensions, Cisco and Polycom hard-IP phones, and 2 VOIP carriers) working except for the frigging analog FXO interfaces. These things are driving me completely mad.

Hey! I have implemented a quick solution for the should != .. , should ! ~ ... ''problem''. It uses source code inspection (I think it''s the only way) and i''ve done some benchmarking to see if it''s really that slow. A direct comparison of running ''1.should == 1'' with the unmodified rspec source against the rspec-version with