search for: braches

Hi all, I am almost ready for the last step with landing my long-standing patch. I have converted (almost) all low-level interface users of CallInst to respective high-level interfaces. What remains is a handful of hunks to flip the switch. But before I do the final commit I'd like to coerce all external users to code against the high-level interface too. This will (almost, but see below)

hi: our company want to use samba3+openldap with singal sign on. we have several branches.people would travel arround head quarter and branches with their notebooks. so we don't have roaming users, but we do have roaming computers. we want to use a single domain for every site, and we want every site keep working even when wan link is broken. my plan below: 1. place

Hi all I use asterisk (1.2 brach) from debian official packages and it works fine. Now I need to install and configure a Digium TE120P card, but I cannot find any guide to install it using debian packages. I would like to know if anyone of you knows about packages that would include the necessary kernel modules or any other method that won't be broken when the asterisk packages are updated.

...rform a clustering. Well, as soon as he told me there proxy only had the Pearson index I thought: “He could just do something like >NewObject<-1-PearsonMatrixObject” But I didn’t tell him that because I’m not sure it’s the same thing, and it probably will generate a strange cluster with the braches ends distant from the base… He told me that Statistica 7.0 has this Index, but he doesn’t own it. So… Is there a way on R to do this correctly? Thanks for the attention. ___________________________________ MSc. <mailto:r.aluizio@gmail.com> Rodrigo Aluizio Centro de Estudos do Mar/UFPR...

Hi, I am in the process of planning a dial plan, In regards to the requirement, I am confused how to go about the dial plan. The scenario is like below. BRANCH - A - (COMPANY) Line 1 -- Extension 239 Line 2 -- Extension 8239 BRANCH - B - (COMPANY) Line 1 -- Extension 239 Line 2 -- Extension 8239 Now what I need is that if a user in Branch - A wants

Am 30.06.2010 um 23:31 schrieb John Criswell: > > Stupid question: is making the getOperand() method of CallInst > going to work? For example, if I have the following code: > > void > method (Instruction * I) { > I->getOperand(2); > ... > } > > void method2 (CallInst * CI) { > method (CI); > ... > } > > Will method() still work

Gabor Greif wrote: > Hi all, > > I am almost ready for the last step with landing my long-standing patch. > I have converted (almost) all low-level interface users of CallInst to > respective high-level interfaces. What remains is a handful of hunks > to flip the switch. > > But before I do the final commit I'd like to coerce all external users > to code against the

There have been offered several patches in order to forward Xinerama support to Xgl and patches for compiz to make use of it (like iXce's ones, which were ignored). So far the patched up compiz is working pretty good and makes it effectively usable in such setups (aside of that those patches will always drift away from official CVS and need to be touched for each commit). However it seems

Sounds great to me Gabor. I really like your new incremental approach to this patch set. -Chris On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Gabor Greif wrote: > Hi all, > > I am almost ready for the last step with landing my long-standing patch. > I have converted (almost) all low-level interface users of CallInst to > respective high-level interfaces. What remains is a handful of hunks >

Gabor Greif wrote: > Am 30.06.2010 um 23:31 schrieb John Criswell: > > >> Stupid question: is making the getOperand() method of CallInst >> going to work? For example, if I have the following code: >> >> void >> method (Instruction * I) { >> I->getOperand(2); >> ... >> } >> >> void method2 (CallInst * CI) {

(This is a continuation of "[PATCH v9] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping") The grant mapping API does m2p_override unnecessarily: only gntdev needs it, for blkback and future netback patches it just cause a lock contention, as those pages never go to userspace. Therefore this series does the following: - the bulk of the original function (everything after the mapping

(This is a continuation of "[PATCH v9] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping") The grant mapping API does m2p_override unnecessarily: only gntdev needs it, for blkback and future netback patches it just cause a lock contention, as those pages never go to userspace. Therefore this series does the following: - the bulk of the original function (everything after the mapping

Ihave the following line in the rules list: .

I'd suggest that a good thing to look at would be functional tests of the metrics and algorithms in Hanxiao Sun's work from this summer. You'll generally need to go either to the original paper, or find an alternative implementation, to build up a series of tests that demonstrate that the implementation is doing what it is supposed to. Xapian-core contains a test framework which it

So, it's advisable to grow cane as near to the factory as possible. He is the fourth person to resign at NFA. They sold it to Russia at virtually give away prices. uuuu WATCH LITL ON WEDNESDAY DEC 13! Company: L INTL COMPUTERS INC (Other OTC:LITL.PK) Symbol: LITL Mon Close: $0.99 5-day Target: $5 L Reveals 8-Way Processing Professional Mobile Computing Design CALL YOUR BROKER TO PLACE

dear admin how to make freebsd 9.1 prerelease in to stable reagrds

Hi folks, i''m looking for a method to route a whole static subnet to another static subnet elsewhere on the internet. I think this must work like this: Packet going to original destination, packet destination is overridden with new destination-ip, packet source is overridden with the original destination. Otherwise the packets will be filtered by the spoofing-protection of the

I recently tried using the latest GParted Live iso (0.16.2-11 i686 PAE) on a few circa-2004 Dell desktops (e.g. Dimension 8400, Precision 370, OptiPlex 170L, all with latest BIOS). However nothing would appear onscreen after selecting cdrom boot. I managed to modify the iso and use isolinux-debug.bin, and the output I always received was: ISOLINUX 6.02 2013-10-13 Copyright (C) H. Peter Anvin et

> > I recently tried using the latest GParted Live iso (0.16.2-11 i686 > > PAE) on a few circa-2004 Dell desktops (e.g. Dimension 8400, Precision > > 370, OptiPlex 170L, all with latest BIOS). However nothing would > > appear onscreen after selecting cdrom boot. > > A recent thread in the Syslinux ML starting at >

On 27/02/14 15:55, Zoltan Kiss wrote: > (This is a continuation of "[PATCH v9] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override > during mapping") > > The grant mapping API does m2p_override unnecessarily: only gntdev needs it, > for blkback and future netback patches it just cause a lock contention, as > those pages never go to userspace. Therefore this series does the following: