search for: br10

hi i've setup the following on debian etch with bridge-utils 1.4 (backported) and kernel 2.6.26 from backports.org: vlan10 with raw device eth0 vlan20 with raw device eth0 br10 with initial port vlan10 br20 with initial port vlan20 i've set hw addr to DE:AD:BE:EF:34:10 for br10 and DE:AD:BE:EF:34:20 for br20 the bridges are used to connect virtual machine nic's. "brctl show" before any other port is attached: bridge name bridge id...

On Thursday, 7 April 2016, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 April 2016 at 19:21, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Hello James, > > > > Wednesday, April 6, 2016, 5:34:26 PM, you wrote: > > > > > Note that this is pretty much the last use case you cannot use > > >

...> > > 2 port configured for teaming1 (set as link only port) -> Create Bridge > > (br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40 and the > > parent is br0. Am I doing this correctly? Thanks > > not exactly. > > nmcli connection add con-name br10 ifname br10 type bridge stp no > nmcli connection down br10 > nmcli connection edit br10 > set ipv4.method disabled > set ipv6.method ignore > save > quit > nmcli connection up br10 > > nmcli connection add con-name vlan10 ifname vlan10 type vlan dev > teaming1 i...

...runk port at my HomeLab Im doing this > 2 port configured for teaming1 (set as link only port) -> Create Bridge > (br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40 and the > parent is br0. Am I doing this correctly? Thanks not exactly. nmcli connection add con-name br10 ifname br10 type bridge stp no nmcli connection down br10 nmcli connection edit br10 set ipv4.method disabled set ipv6.method ignore save quit nmcli connection up br10 nmcli connection add con-name vlan10 ifname vlan10 type vlan dev teaming1 id 10 nmcli connection down vlan10 nmcli connectio...

...for teaming1 (set as link only port) -> Create Bridge >> > (br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40 and >> the >> > parent is br0. Am I doing this correctly? Thanks >> >> not exactly. >> >> nmcli connection add con-name br10 ifname br10 type bridge stp no >> nmcli connection down br10 >> nmcli connection edit br10 >> set ipv4.method disabled >> set ipv6.method ignore >> save >> quit >> nmcli connection up br10 >> >> nmcli connection add con-name vlan10 ifname...

...nly port) -> Create Bridge >>> > (br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40 and >>> the >>> > parent is br0. Am I doing this correctly? Thanks >>> >>> not exactly. >>> >>> nmcli connection add con-name br10 ifname br10 type bridge stp no >>> nmcli connection down br10 >>> nmcli connection edit br10 >>> set ipv4.method disabled >>> set ipv6.method ignore >>> save >>> quit >>> nmcli connection up br10 >>> >>> nmcli connect...

Hello, my current network setup looks like the following: dom2-eth0 (172.30.1.22) netmask /24 | | xen-br1 (no ip) | dom1-eth0 (172.30.1.21) netmask /24 dom1-eth1 (172.30.0.21) netmask /24 | | xen-br10 (172.30.0.1) netmask /24 | dom0 | | xen-br0 (normal IP) | eth0 (same IP as xen-br0) | | LAN Basically I want to route all traffic between dom0 and dom2 through dom1. This does work as intended. I further would like to have access...

Hi, I'm wondering about the impact of using both dom0 and domU's on a server at the same time. I'm worried about the performance impact of running a Mysql server in a domU and now I'm thinking about moving the Mysql part of a LAMP setup into dom0 and running a few Apache guests as domUs. Since the Apaches will serve mostly from an NFS share they won't have much impact on

...reter enabled ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) PCI: Transparent bridge - 0000:00:06.0 Boot video device is 0000:03:00.0 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.BR10._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.BR11._PRT] and so on....