search for: br0

Hi wondering if anyone can help. I have two NICs on a debian sarge based system and current running as a bridge (br0) which consists of eth0 and eth1. Is it possible to add a virtual interface to the eth1 so I can also do NAT on the box as well? I have tried many times and keep coming up with errors. Kind Regards William Bohannan

Hi, the new function ''shorewall show zones'' in 2.2.0-Beta showed a thing which is (in my view) either abug or not documented. If I have a line in /etc/shorewall/hosts which reads work br0:eth0:192.168.2.10,192.168.2.11,192.168.2.12 then "show zones" has the output work br0:eth0:192.168.2.10 br0:192.168.2.11 br0:192.168.2.12 That is, the interface eth0 is ignored for the latter 2 entries in the list. However, the line work br0:eth0:192.168.2.10,eth0:...

I''m new on this mailing list, reading it for last 4 weeks, ... Need help please... I want to implement tc rules on br0 witch is build of wlan0, wlan0wds0, wlan0wds1? I did something but it doesn''t do good job, it doesn''t give constant flow ... any idea, please if someone already have experiance... OS: Suse 9.0 myshaper ---------------------------------------------------------------------------...

re can somebody tell me what am I doing wrong (at this late night hour), because vlan are not getting bridged at all. ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1 ifconfig br0 up vconfig add br0 X vconfig add br0 Y X = vlan-ID (example: 222) Y = vlan ID (example: 223) # brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.00001a1a4c74 no...

Hi, I had successfully setup my bridge (br0) but after few minutes the br0 interface seems not working. ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 ifconfig eth5 0.0.0.0 brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth5 brctl stp br0 on I check on my system's /var/log/syslog file. It shows something strange messages as below: - Jan 2 10:44:2...

...uests as expected but since the guest was no longer bridged the packets went no-where. How do I handle proper recovery from this? The sequence on the host seemed to be: 07:00:00 I powered off the DHCP server and router for electrical work Jun 26 10:08:02 vm-server dhclient[973]: DHCPREQUEST on br0 to 192.168.2.1 port 67 (xid=0x7627186d) requests continue for quite some hours and then NetworkManager chimes in. Jun 26 14:55:23 vm-server NetworkManager[840]: <info> [1498503323.1518] dhcp4 (br0): state changed bound -> expire Jun 26 14:55:23 vm-server NetworkManager[840]: <info&...

Hi, everyone I has a ADSL link about 4M bandwidth, and use HTB do bandwidth management. When I config qdisc like below: tc qdisc add dev br0 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev br0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 4000kbit tc class add dev br0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2000kbit ceil 4000kbit prio 0 tc class add dev br0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 4000kbit prio 1 tc class add dev br0 parent 1:1 clas...

...also have a fully functioning DHCP server on eth0 (works perfectly with Parallels for Linux). The directions (from hell): http://www.virtualbox.org/download/UserManual.pdf I am trying to set up a "host interface" network between my XP guest and my Linux host. Three problems: 1) "br0" does not resolve with my DHCP server: "No DHCPOFFERS received" 2) Virtual Box will not start, unless I switch to no network or NAT network 3) eth1 will not communicate with the Internet after restarting the network daemon to try to bet an address for br0 Following the directio...

Hello, how do achieve this: how must files /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ look like to be the same as entering the following two commands ... ip -f inet6 rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100 ip -f inet6 route add local ::/0 dev lo table 100 is there the localhost device lo correct, or does it have to be br0? e.g. a file route-br0 with 192.168.1.0/24 via 10.10.10.1 dev br0 does the routing to the segment 192.168.1.0/24 via 10.10.10.1 /etc/sysconfig/ip6tables <BEGIN> *mangle :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] -N DIVE...

...rdware machine, and CentOS 6.2 has no any connection with virtual machine. But every others machines have all connection with both virtual and CentOS 6.2 machine. The question: Why? The second case: ---------------------- The configuration is: - On CentOS 6.2 (hardware machine) I created bridhe (br0) with eth0 hardware interface. Two situations: + I force two different IP addresses for eth0 and br0 interfaces - there no any connection with this server. So I don't test this case. + I forced one IP addres for both eth0 and br0 interfaces. ifconfig shows that eth0 has no IP address, b...

Hey, I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows: ____ ____ / VM1\______br0_______/ em1\ \____/ | \____/ | _|_ /VM2\ \____/ virbr0 is the virtual network switch VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively. em1 is the default network interface. $sudo ovs-vsctl add-br br0 $sudo ovs-vsctl add-port br0 em1 $sudo...

...------------------------------ $ cat /etc/network/interfaces auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto eth1 iface eth1 inet dhcp wpa-driver wext wpa-ssid ##SSID## wpa-ap-scan 1 wpa-proto RSN wpa-pairwise CCMP wpa-group CCMP wpa-key-mgmt WPA-PSK wpa-psk ##PSK KEY## auto br0 iface br0 inet dhcp bridge_ports eth0 eth1 ----------------------------------------------------------- So, eth1 is my wireless connection, eth0 is my wired connection. Without the bridge, I'm able to make a connection on my wireless side, as on my wired side. When I bring up the bridge, nothi...

Hi all, I have one bridge system (used for controlling bandwidth) connected to three different DSL ISP provider. I have the following setup below: - +-------------+ | br0 | | -> eth1 | -> DSL_1 | -> eth2 | +-------------+ | br1 | | -> eth3 | -> DSL_2 | -> eth4 | +-------------+ | br2 | | -> eth5 | -> DSL_3 | -> eth6 | +-------------+ br0 has eth1 and e...

I''ve uploaded Beta 4. It corrects a bad bug involving exclusion in the hosts file. In addition, it contains the first release of a new Bridge/firewall implementation that uses the reduced-function physdev match found in kernel 3.6.20 and 3.6.21. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \

I''ve uploaded Beta 4. It corrects a bad bug involving exclusion in the hosts file. In addition, it contains the first release of a new Bridge/firewall implementation that uses the reduced-function physdev match found in kernel 3.6.20 and 3.6.21. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \

Hi, I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as follows: nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address And the operating systems is extremely slow Interfaces files : [root at localhost ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* DEVIC...

Hello all, I'm trying to bridge the wlan0 and eth0 on an embedded system. I used the following commands to setup the bridge: ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 promiscuous ifconfig wlan0 0.0.0.0 promiscuous brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 wlan0 brctl sethello br0 1 brctl setmaxage br0 4 brctl setfd br0 4 ifconfig br0 up The eth0 is connected to a local network, and wlan0 is set to Ad-hoc mode with proper SSID. After the bridge is stablized, I use dhclient to assign an IP for br0. Then I use a la...

...now controller and then floods it out. So here's what happening: With em1 connected, all the packets that arrive at em1 are coming to the controller and printing out the details. However, without em1 connected to the OVS, when I have the following setup: ____ ____ / VM1\______br0_______/ VM3\ \____/ | \____/ | _|_ /VM2\ \___/ VM1 & VM2 are of the same subnet. They can ping each other. The ping packets aren't seen at the controller probably because they are in the same subnet and they don't need a flow...

Hi guys, i have a little doubt ; I have eth0 ethernet and eth1 wireless , and they are bridged in br0 Is there any difference in the behavior between do tc qdisc add dev br0 root sfq OR tc qdisc add dev eth0 root sfq && tc qdisc add dev eth1 root sfq -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente&quot...

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]