search for: bp2

...----------------------------------------------------- -------# CIT2a=function(var1,var2,bp1){ { ifelse (var1<=bp1,(var1=0),(var1=var2-bp1)) } } T2a=CIT2a(CLD_ISCH,CLD_ISCH,tf1) #----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------# CIT2b=function(var1,var2,bp1,bp2){ { ifelse (var1>(bp2-bp1),(var1=bp2-bp1),(var1=T2a)) } } T2=CIT2b(T2a,T2a,tf1,tf2) #----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------# CIT3=function(var1,var2,bp2){ { ifelse (var1<=bp2,(var1=0),(var1=var2-bp2)) } } T3=CIT3(CLD_ISCH,CLD_ISCH,tf2)...

...------------------------------------ bp1 <- bwplot(voice.part ~ height, data = singer, main="1 color works", panel = function(...) { panel.bwplot(col=c("yellow"), fill=c("yellow"), ...) }) bp2 <- bwplot(voice.part ~ height, data = singer, main = "3 colors do NOT work", panel = function(...) { panel.grid(v = -1, h = 0) panel.bwplot(col=c("yellow","blue","green"), fill...

...l) %*% degree(graph, mode="out") if (rescale) { ev <- ev/sum(ev) } else { ev <- ev * sqrt(vcount(graph)/sum((ev)^2)) } ev[as.numeric(nodes) + 1] } ## test graph test.g <- simplify(ba.game(1000,m=2)) ## test run system.time(bp1 <- bonpow(test.g)) system.time(bp2 <- bonpow.sparse(test.g)) ## check that they are the same max(abs(bp1-bp2)) I get following error and sometime it crashes. In solve(id - exponent * d, tol = tol) : Reached total allocation of 1535Mb: see help(memory.size).I increased the memory size and still it is not helpful Help on this wo...

...9;) biplot.s(x, scale=T, weight='ob') biplot.s(x, scale=T, weight='va') #=============================================================================== # 3d with scatterplot3d package #=============================================================================== x = gabriel.1971 bp2 = biplot.s(x, lambda.end=3, plot=F) bp2$val bp2$expl bp2$obj bp2$var bp2$all biplot.s(x, lambda.end=3) biplot.s(x, lambda.ini=2, lambda.end=4) biplot.s(x, lambda.end=3, spheres=T, box=T) biplot.s(x, lambda.end=3, col.obj='gray', col.var='red', var.factor=.8) biplot.s(x, lambda.end=...

Is it possible to use some form of robust regression with the breakpoints routine so that it is less sensitive to outliers? --Rich Richard Kittler Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Sunnyvale, CA

...l) %*% degree(graph, mode="out") if (rescale) { ev <- ev/sum(ev) } else { ev <- ev * sqrt(vcount(graph)/sum((ev)^2)) } ev[as.numeric(nodes) + 1] } ## test graph test.g <- simplify(ba.game(1000,m=2)) ## test run system.time(bp1 <- bonpow(test.g)) system.time(bp2 <- bonpow.sparse(test.g)) ## check that they are the same max(abs(bp1-bp2)) I get following error and sometime it crashes. In solve(id - exponent * d, tol = tol) : Reached total allocation of 1535Mb: see help(memory.size).I increased the memory size and still it is not helpful Help on this...

...or something elese. with sshd command it is possible to use telnet by port 22, do you think that is it possible to forbiden this kind of thing and to have only ftp command. many thanks in advance. best regards > DAVID PIERROT > UNEDIC Ma?trise d'Oeuvre > * 5, avenue Jean Jaures - BP2 - 69551 FEYZIN Cedex msg : dpierrott at unedic.fr Tel. : 04-72-89-23-62 +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ce courrier ainsi que les fichiers joints sont confidentiels. | | Si vous avez recu ce courrier par erreur, veuillez en informer | | l...

...slave that is not >> > attached to this master but has the same MAC. >> Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. > >We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as >a bypass setup. > >> Consider: >> >> bp1 bp2 >> a1 b1 a2 b2 >> >> >> a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. > >We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. >I need to add a check in the bypass_master_register() to prevent this. Mac can change, you would have to check in...

...slave that is not >> > attached to this master but has the same MAC. >> Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. > >We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as >a bypass setup. > >> Consider: >> >> bp1 bp2 >> a1 b1 a2 b2 >> >> >> a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. > >We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. >I need to add a check in the bypass_master_register() to prevent this. Mac can change, you would have to check in...

...this check to not allow events from a slave that is not >> attached to this master but has the same MAC. > Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as a bypass setup. > Consider: > > bp1 bp2 > a1 b1 a2 b2 > > > a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. I need to add a check in the bypass_master_register() to prevent this. The above check is to avoid cases where we have bp1(a1, b1) with mac1 and...

...9;t need this check. "if (!netif_is_bypass_slave(slave_netdev))" >> above is enough. > >I think we need this check to not allow events from a slave that is not >attached to this master but has the same MAC. Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. Consider: bp1 bp2 a1 b1 a2 b2 a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. Now bypass_master_get_bymac() will return always bp1 or bp2 - depending on the order of creation. Let's say it will return bp1. Then when we have event for a2, the bypass_ops->slave_link_change is called with (a2...

...9;t need this check. "if (!netif_is_bypass_slave(slave_netdev))" >> above is enough. > >I think we need this check to not allow events from a slave that is not >attached to this master but has the same MAC. Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. Consider: bp1 bp2 a1 b1 a2 b2 a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. Now bypass_master_get_bymac() will return always bp1 or bp2 - depending on the order of creation. Let's say it will return bp1. Then when we have event for a2, the bypass_ops->slave_link_change is called with (a2...

...d to this master but has the same MAC. > >> Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. > > > >We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as > >a bypass setup. > > > >> Consider: > >> > >> bp1 bp2 > >> a1 b1 a2 b2 > >> > >> > >> a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. > > > >We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. > >I need to add a check in the bypass_master_register() to prevent this. > &gt...

Hi all, I was intending on trying out gjournal on a new disk i've added in my desktop. I had a look to see what the most recent patch provided by Pawel and found http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/gjournal6_20061024.patch I created the directories as per Pawel's original post (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2006-June/001962.html) and the patch succeeded with no failed

...e MAC. >> >> Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. >> > >> >We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as >> >a bypass setup. >> > >> >> Consider: >> >> >> >> bp1 bp2 >> >> a1 b1 a2 b2 >> >> >> >> >> >> a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. >> > >> >We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. >> >I need to add a check in the bypass_master_register(...

...e MAC. >> >> Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. >> > >> >We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as >> >a bypass setup. >> > >> >> Consider: >> >> >> >> bp1 bp2 >> >> a1 b1 a2 b2 >> >> >> >> >> >> a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. >> > >> >We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. >> >I need to add a check in the bypass_master_register(...

...b78_disk1` - but this also fails `cp -r /usr /tank/usr` - system has 24 sata/sas drive bays, but only 12 of them all populated - system has three AOC-SAT2-MV8 cards plugged into 6 mini-sas backplanes - card1 ("c3") - bp1 (c3t0d0, c3t1d0) - bp2 (c3t4d0, c3t5d0) - card2 ("c4") - bp1 (c4t0d0, c4t1d0) - bp2 (c4t4d0, c4t5d0) - card3 ("c5") - bp1 (c5t0d0, c5t1d0) - bp2 (c5t4d0, c5t5d0) - system has one Barcelona Opteron (step BA) - the one with...

Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:59:48PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >This provides a generic interface for paravirtual drivers to listen >for netdev register/unregister/link change events from pci ethernet >devices with the same MAC and takeover their datapath. The notifier and >event handling code is based on the existing netvsc implementation. > >It exposes 2 sets of

Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:59:48PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >This provides a generic interface for paravirtual drivers to listen >for netdev register/unregister/link change events from pci ethernet >devices with the same MAC and takeover their datapath. The notifier and >event handling code is based on the existing netvsc implementation. > >It exposes 2 sets of