search for: bp1

...ach received several different treatments. One measure is a 1-7 rating taken several times per treatment (about 1-14 times per session). studentkey, classkey, and treatment are factor()s. The table looks something like this: ete classkey studentkey treatment 1 7 4 108 bp1 2 4 4 117 bp1 3 6 4 120 bp1 4 6 4 105 bp1 5 3 4 100 bp1 6 3 4 100 bp1 7 4 4 107 bp1 8 3 4 100 bp1 9 7 4 107 bp1 10...

...reds of calculations 1 at a time - ahhhhh! Code is below: - sorry for not including an example dataset. Am hoping the code itself. If not pls say and i'll try and repost with a small example dataset. ######################################################### tf1=11 tf2=18 CIT1=function(var1,bp1){ { ifelse (var1<=bp1,(var1=var1),(bp1)) } } T1=CIT1(CLD_ISCH,tf1) #----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------# CIT2a=function(var1,var2,bp1){ { ifelse (var1<=bp1,(var1=0),(var1=var2-bp1)) } } T2a=CIT2a(CLD_ISCH,CLD_ISCH,tf1) #--------------...

...mmended configuration for the > application which I use - ClearCase) > > We are running on a Solaris 10 server. > > We created a machine account for the server and then ran the command > to join the domain : > net rpc join -S domain_controller -U user%pass > Joined domain BP1. > > The fact that we got the "joined domain" message looked encouraging. > > I thought that this would update /usr/local/samba/private/secrets.tdb > - but the timestamp of this file didn't change. Is this normal ? Maybe > it is because we can now access the samba...

...Samba 3.0.11 (this seems to be the recommended configuration for the application which I use - ClearCase) We are running on a Solaris 10 server. We created a machine account for the server and then ran the command to join the domain : net rpc join -S domain_controller -U user%pass Joined domain BP1. The fact that we got the "joined domain" message looked encouraging. I thought that this would update /usr/local/samba/private/secrets.tdb - but the timestamp of this file didn't change. Is this normal ? Maybe it is because we can now access the samba share from a client PC. Howeve...

Hello everyone, using the VGAM package and the following code library(VGAM) bp1 <- vglm(cbind(daten$anzahl_b, daten$deckung_b) ~ ., binom2.rho, data=daten1) summary(bp1) coef(bp1, matrix=TRUE) produced this error message: error in object$coefficients : $ operator not defined for this S4 class I am bit confused because some day ago this error message did not sh...

...ts from a slave that is not >> > attached to this master but has the same MAC. >> Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. > >We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as >a bypass setup. > >> Consider: >> >> bp1 bp2 >> a1 b1 a2 b2 >> >> >> a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. > >We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. >I need to add a check in the bypass_master_register() to prevent this. Mac can change, you would have to...

...ts from a slave that is not >> > attached to this master but has the same MAC. >> Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. > >We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as >a bypass setup. > >> Consider: >> >> bp1 bp2 >> a1 b1 a2 b2 >> >> >> a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. > >We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. >I need to add a check in the bypass_master_register() to prevent this. Mac can change, you would have to...

...is only intended to fill all boxes with only one colour? Nevertheless the following example shows, that 'fill' from panel.bwplot is able to work with more than one colour. But this only works with one colour or multiples of 5 colours: ------------------------------------------------- bp1 <- bwplot(voice.part ~ height, data = singer, main="1 color works", panel = function(...) { panel.bwplot(col=c("yellow"), fill=c("yellow"), ...) }) bp2 <- bwplot(voice.part ~ height, da...

...k we need this check to not allow events from a slave that is not >> attached to this master but has the same MAC. > Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as a bypass setup. > Consider: > > bp1 bp2 > a1 b1 a2 b2 > > > a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. I need to add a check in the bypass_master_register() to prevent this. The above check is to avoid cases where we have bp1(a1, b1) with...

...; attached to this master but has the same MAC. > >> Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. > > > >We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as > >a bypass setup. > > > >> Consider: > >> > >> bp1 bp2 > >> a1 b1 a2 b2 > >> > >> > >> a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. > > > >We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. > >I need to add a check in the bypass_master_register() to prevent this....

...ou don't need this check. "if (!netif_is_bypass_slave(slave_netdev))" >> above is enough. > >I think we need this check to not allow events from a slave that is not >attached to this master but has the same MAC. Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. Consider: bp1 bp2 a1 b1 a2 b2 a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. Now bypass_master_get_bymac() will return always bp1 or bp2 - depending on the order of creation. Let's say it will return bp1. Then when we have event for a2, the bypass_ops->slave_link_change is called...

...ou don't need this check. "if (!netif_is_bypass_slave(slave_netdev))" >> above is enough. > >I think we need this check to not allow events from a slave that is not >attached to this master but has the same MAC. Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. Consider: bp1 bp2 a1 b1 a2 b2 a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. Now bypass_master_get_bymac() will return always bp1 or bp2 - depending on the order of creation. Let's say it will return bp1. Then when we have event for a2, the bypass_ops->slave_link_change is called...

...<- solve(id - exponent * d, tol=tol) %*% degree(graph, mode="out") if (rescale) { ev <- ev/sum(ev) } else { ev <- ev * sqrt(vcount(graph)/sum((ev)^2)) } ev[as.numeric(nodes) + 1] } ## test graph test.g <- simplify(ba.game(1000,m=2)) ## test run system.time(bp1 <- bonpow(test.g)) system.time(bp2 <- bonpow.sparse(test.g)) ## check that they are the same max(abs(bp1-bp2)) I get following error and sometime it crashes. In solve(id - exponent * d, tol = tol) : Reached total allocation of 1535Mb: see help(memory.size).I increased the memory size and st...

...#39;, 'OTHER_1', 'OTHER_2', 'RUR')) #=============================================================================== # 2d with graphics package #=============================================================================== x = gabriel.1971 bp1 = biplot.s(x, plot=F) bp1$val bp1$expl bp1$obj bp1$var bp1$all biplot.s(x, center=F, scale=F) biplot.s(x, center=T, scale=F) biplot.s(x, center=T, scale=T) biplot.s(x, lambda.ini=2, lambda.end=3) biplot.s(x, lambda.ini=2, lambda.end=3, scale=T) biplot.s(x, scale=T, weight='eq') biplot.s(x,...

Is it possible to use some form of robust regression with the breakpoints routine so that it is less sensitive to outliers? --Rich Richard Kittler Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Sunnyvale, CA

...<- solve(id - exponent * d, tol=tol) %*% degree(graph, mode="out") if (rescale) { ev <- ev/sum(ev) } else { ev <- ev * sqrt(vcount(graph)/sum((ev)^2)) } ev[as.numeric(nodes) + 1] } ## test graph test.g <- simplify(ba.game(1000,m=2)) ## test run system.time(bp1 <- bonpow(test.g)) system.time(bp2 <- bonpow.sparse(test.g)) ## check that they are the same max(abs(bp1-bp2)) I get following error and sometime it crashes. In solve(id - exponent * d, tol = tol) : Reached total allocation of 1535Mb: see help(memory.size).I increased the memory size and...

...s the same MAC. >> >> Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. >> > >> >We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as >> >a bypass setup. >> > >> >> Consider: >> >> >> >> bp1 bp2 >> >> a1 b1 a2 b2 >> >> >> >> >> >> a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. >> > >> >We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. >> >I need to add a check in the bypass_master_...

...s the same MAC. >> >> Why do we need such events? Seems wrong to me. >> > >> >We want to avoid events from a netdev that is mis-configured with the same MAC as >> >a bypass setup. >> > >> >> Consider: >> >> >> >> bp1 bp2 >> >> a1 b1 a2 b2 >> >> >> >> >> >> a1 and a2 have the same mac and bp1 and bp2 have the same mac. >> > >> >We should not have 2 bypass configs with the same MAC. >> >I need to add a check in the bypass_master_...

Hi All I downloaded the binary package of Samba 2.2.2 on Friday from one of the Samba mirror sites, I think Belgium, and installed it on a Sun E450 running Solaris 2.6. Today everything has fallen flat on its face. Unfortunately I am on holiday this week so not able to deal with the problem directly, but via telephone calls. Apparently what is happening is that smbd is gobbling up all the

Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:59:48PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >This provides a generic interface for paravirtual drivers to listen >for netdev register/unregister/link change events from pci ethernet >devices with the same MAC and takeover their datapath. The notifier and >event handling code is based on the existing netvsc implementation. > >It exposes 2 sets of