search for: bond_alb_initialize

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 01:02:14PM +0530, Allen Pais wrote: > Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml at gmail.com> Hi Allen Although correct, if you look higher up the call chain, this appears to be not so useful. rlb_initialize() is only called by bond_alb_initialize(), and it propagates the -1. That is only called by bond_open() with: if (bond_alb_initialize(bond, (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_ALB))) return -ENOMEM; So you might want to also modify this code, to return the return value, rather than use the hard coded ENOMEM. Since you code is OK as far a...

> propagates the -1. That is only called by bond_open() with: > > if (bond_alb_initialize(bond, (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_ALB))) > return -ENOMEM; > > So you might want to also modify this code, to return the return > value, rather than use the hard coded ENOMEM. > I'll modify the above and send it out a separate patch. Thank you.

Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml at gmail.com> --- arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spider-pci.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spider-pci.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spider-pci.c index d1e61e2..82aa3f7 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spider-pci.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spider-pci.c @@ -106,7 +106,7