Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "blogview".
Did you mean:
logview
2017 May 31
2
CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/31/2017 8:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> I've got an old RAID that I attached to a box. LSI card, and the RAID
>> has 12 drives, for a total RAID size of 9.1TB, I think. I started shred
>> /dev/sda the Friday before last... and it's still running. Is this
>> reasonable for it to be taking this long...?
>
> not at all
2017 May 31
0
CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID
...f the drive(s).
the DoD multipass erase procedure is long obsolete and deprecated. It
was based on MFM and RLL technology prevalent in the mid 1980s. NISPOM
2006-5220 replaced it in 2006, and says "DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL/SECRET
INFORMATION PHYSICALLY".
http://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/16130-The-Urban-Legend-of-Multipass-Hard-Disk-Overwrite.html
http://www.dss.mil/documents/odaa/nispom2006-5220.pdf
from that blog,...
> Fortunately, several security researchers presented a paper [WRIG08
> <http://www.springerlink.com/content/408263ql11460147/>] at the Fourth
> I...
2017 May 31
3
CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID
...DoD multipass erase procedure is long obsolete and deprecated. It
> was based on MFM and RLL technology prevalent in the mid 1980s. NISPOM
> 2006-5220 replaced it in 2006, and says "DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL/SECRET
> INFORMATION PHYSICALLY".
>
> http://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/16130-The-Urban-Legend-of-Multipass-Hard-Disk-Overwrite.html
> http://www.dss.mil/documents/odaa/nispom2006-5220.pdf
>
> from that blog,...
>
>> Fortunately, several security researchers presented a paper [WRIG08
>> <http://www.springerlink.com/content/408263ql11460147/&g...
2005 Oct 17
7
Ajax.MultiUpdater ?
Hi,
I''m using prototype within ruby on rails.
One limitation I''d like to overcome is the restriction of beeing able to
update just one html elements content using from_remote_tag or
link_to_remote.
AFAICS this is just a restriction of the form_remote_tag/link_to_remote
implementation and it''s underlying Ajax.Updater class. Right?
In theorie there should be no problem,