search for: blocked

I''m on Fedora''s 3.8.5-201.fc18.x86_64. I tried to do some not-very-heavy I/O on my system (i.e. save kernel/sys.c in emacs) and it took about a minute. Everything went downhill from there. My system was basically idle at the time. (I have very little in the way of diagnostics because I couldn''t do much but hit the reset button after a couple of minutes.) On

Hello everybody. I got some strange problem when running wine with ALSA as sound driver. For example: when I run mdk2 (I compiled wine myself version 0.9.22 - newest for now) sound is very noisy and crack'y and I get tons of this errors: err:dsound:DSOUND_MixInBuffer length not a multiple of block size, len = 3122, block size = 4 err:dsound:DSOUND_MixInBuffer length not a multiple of block

every one,I meet a problem: I used reahat9.0(kernel 2.4.20-8smp,I installed a SCSI RAID Card),and there are always some problems and them the system is dead. is anyone can help me about it? Thanks Crist Below is the error log: Jun 11 22:19:03 mail1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,18)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 1382828372, count = 1 Jun 11 22:19:03 mail1

I recently bought 2 different USB flash disks. These are some cheap no-name devices. Their parameters: bytes C/H/S ID 4194304512 509/255/63 Vendor: Generic Model: USB Flash Drive Rev: 1.00 ANSI SCSI revision: 02 4288676352 1023/132/62 Vendor: USB Model: USB 2.0 Rev: 1.00 ANSI SCSI revision: 02 When I put a FAT32 filesystem on them,

Hi. I'm attempting to setup a box here to be a file-server for all my data. I'm attempting to resize an ext3 partition to demonstrate this capability to myself before fully committing to this system as the primary data storage. I'm having some problems resizing an ext3 filesystem after I've resized the underlying logical volume. Following the ext3 resize, fsck spits out lots

Hi Everyone, I have pfSense running which supplies Asterisk with DHCP. I had some testing ports opened for a web server which I have totally closed now but when I chose option 10 (filter log) on pfSense I get all of this type of traffic (note that it was only 1 single IP and once I blocked that one it was like opening a can full of bees with all different IPs): tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no IPv4 address assigned tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG (OpenBSD pflog file), capture size 96 bytes 000000 rule 70/0...

Hello, sorry if the question was asked a couple of times before but I couldn't find any useful hinds to this problem using google and the listman search-engine of the archive of this list. Somehow the ext3 filesystem on one of my machines died an after a reboot grub wouldn't come up again. What I did so far: fsck -y /dev/hda4 fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)

Done with coccinelle: @@ expression e1, e2, e3; identifier rc; @@ ( rc = device_add_disk(e1, e2, e3); | + /* FIXME: handle error. */ device_add_disk(e1, e2, e3); ) Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz at redhat.com> --- arch/m68k/emu/nfblock.c | 1 + arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c | 1 + arch/xtensa/platforms/iss/simdisk.c | 1 + drivers/block/DAC960.c

...ken REGR. vs. 11890 build-i386-pvops 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 11890 build-amd64-pvops 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 11890 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-i386-i386-xl-win 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 1 xen-build-check(1) blo...

Hi all, This is about https://reviews.llvm.org/D26100 That change moves the block info block state from BitstreamReader to BitstreamCursor in order to accommodate multiple block info blocks (the idea is that the cursor would store the block info block state for whichever block info block is active for that cursor). Duncan objected to it on the grounds that we should aim for a design that would

...fail REGR. vs. 12437 build-amd64 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 12437 build-amd64-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 12437 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-i386-i386-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-amd64-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) bloc...

...broken REGR. vs. 13536 build-amd64-pvops 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 13536 build-i386 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 13536 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-amd64-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-amd64-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked...

Hi guys I gave these patches a try (on top of 2.6.23-rc9 plus the previously submitted 2.6.24 patch set). The last two seem to cause Badness on my system, whereby if I start a guest (using the same bzImage as the host, as before) it seems to boot OK, and the host system still superficially looks stable (my X session is OK and I can interact with existing processes) but if I attempt to launch any

Hi guys I gave these patches a try (on top of 2.6.23-rc9 plus the previously submitted 2.6.24 patch set). The last two seem to cause Badness on my system, whereby if I start a guest (using the same bzImage as the host, as before) it seems to boot OK, and the host system still superficially looks stable (my X session is OK and I can interact with existing processes) but if I attempt to launch any

> On Oct 28, 2016, at 6:00 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is about https://reviews.llvm.org/D26100 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D26100> > > That change moves the block info block state from BitstreamReader to BitstreamCursor in order to accommodate multiple block info blocks (the idea is that the cursor would store the

I installed a fresh copy of Debian 4.0 and Xen 3.1.0 SMP PAE from the binaries. I had a few issues getting fully virtualized guests up and running, but finally managed to figure everything out. Now I''m having a problem with paravirtualized guests and hoping that someone can help. My domU config: # # Configuration file for the Xen instance dev.umucaoki.org, created # by xen-tools

This is an attempt to fix the issue that some disks' sysfs attributes are not ready at the time its KOBJ_ADD event is sent. The symptom is during device hotplug, udev may fail to find certain attributes, such as serial or wwn, of the disk. As a result the /dev/disk/by-id entries are not created. The cause is device_add_disk emits the uevent before returning, and the callers have to create

This is an attempt to fix the issue that some disks' sysfs attributes are not ready at the time its KOBJ_ADD event is sent. The symptom is during device hotplug, udev may fail to find certain attributes, such as serial or wwn, of the disk. As a result the /dev/disk/by-id entries are not created. The cause is device_add_disk emits the uevent before returning, and the callers have to create

It would go something like like the code below. The goal would be to turn the basic blocks which the graph looks like "...->x->y->..." where the instructions of x and y could live in the same basic block without a jump or fall through in between. bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &mf) { BitVector seen( mf.size() ); for( unsigned i = 0, e = mf.size();

On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> >> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> This is >>>> >>>> b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1141) * are mapped to