search for: blo

...ns") tabs <- mm$tables[-1] tabs <- tabs[which] res <- list(av=x, which=which) return(res) } GENERETING DATA var <- sort(gl(3, 24, lab=c('Ladak', 'Cossack', 'Ranger'))) man <- rep(gl(4, 6, lab=LETTERS[1:4]), 3) sub <- rep(gl(4, 6), 3) blo <- factor(rep(1:6, 12)) y <- c(2.17, 1.88, 1.62, 2.34, 1.58, 1.66, 1.58, 1.26, 1.22, 1.59, 1.25, 0.94, 2.29, 1.60, 1.67, 1.91, 1.39, 1.12, 2.23, 2.01, 1.82, 2.10, 1.66, 1.10, 2.33, 2.01, 1.70, 1.78, 1.42, 1.35, 1.38, 1.30, 1.85, 1.09, 1.13, 1.06,...

...10845", "1", "1103", "18", "OPEN", "DEPR"), .Dim = c(7L, 4L), .Dimnames = list( c("Sn", "SlnC", "housenum", "date", "hour", "flue", "pressurization" ), c("10019.BLO", "1002.BLO", "10020.BLO", "10021.BLO"))) How do I convert rows 1-5 to numeric? I tried mode() <- "numeric" but that doesn't change anything. I also tried converting this to a table then converting to numeric, but I got: (list) object can...

...quot;) n<-100 m<-200 rho<-0.7 sigma<-0.2 mu<-0.1 Cov <- matrix(rho*sigma*sigma, ncol=n, nrow=n) diag(Cov) <- rep(sigma*sigma, n) S <- 1+matrix(mvrnorm(m, rep(mu, n), Sigma=Cov), ncol=n) #The problem is formulated as minimize t(b) Cov b #subject to cLo <= A <= cUp #and bLo=0 <= w <= 1=bUp Cov <- var(S) mu <- apply(S, 2, mean) mu.target <- 0.1 #subject to cLo <= A <= cUp and bLo=0 <= b <= 1=bUp A <- rbind(1,mu) cLo <- c(1, mu.target) cUp <- c(1, Inf) bLo <- rep(0, n) bUp <- rep(1, n) #I convert [cLo <= A <= cUp] to Ama...

Hello, I try this : in application_helper.rb ----------------------- def lnk bla return link_to bla, { :controller => bli , :action => "blo" , :id => "blu" } end in file.rhtml ----------- <%= lnk "yo!" %> This return an error. There is a way to do this or something similar, or this is completly impossible ? Thanks

...oes to this addressess goes both to the sales person and to a catch all mailbox which is then input into our systems. I was wondering if it would be possible so that when an email is received to this format of address it automatically determines where to send it as follows An email comes into joe.bloggs.sa... at example.com this then gets split so that it is delivered to joe.blo... at example.com and also s... at example.com. I think that i have figured out how to rewrite to the second address but how can I get it to send it to the new address as well. I was hoping there would be a way of d...

...can distribution in R? I've been trying to make a new and more flexible function for multiple comparison of means: Tukey, SNK and Duncan, from 'aov' objects, like TukeyHSD function. For while, it is running nice (Tukey and SNK), for simple design (completely randomized, randomized block and Latin squares) and simple experimental schemes (one factor). I'm needing only two informations: 'qduncan' and 'pduncan', similar to already available in R 'qtukey' and 'ptukey'. The basic algorithm implemented with SNK test will be used for Duncan test...

...o? by virtue of x2 being restrict you know that *x2 > > > doesn't alias A, and *x1 is A. > > > > No, it doesn't. The fact that x2 is restrict does not mean that it > > does not alias with any other potential accesses from variables > > live > > in its block. It only means it does not alias with other accesses > > with that occur in the block where x2 is live. There is no access > > to > > A or x1 in that block, so we can say nothing about it. > > > > > > > > It does. You can assume x2 is not aliased to A...

Having almost written a Tcl program to convert S help to Rd format, I have one problem that I have failed to solve after reading 'R-exts'. Is there a tag something like '\item' that works in a similar way but doesn't have to be after an '\arguments' or '\value' tag? I'm trying to include sections on 'MODEL PARAMETERS' and 'DESIGN

...eta Literaturaren Didaktika Saila | EUDIA ikerketa taldea Bilboko Hezkuntza Fakultatea Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV/EHU Sarriena auzoa z/g 48940 - Leioa (Bizkaia) T: (+34) 94 601 7567 Telegram: @JuanAbasolo Skype: abasolo72 Tutoretza ordutegia <https://labur.eus/JAbasolo-tutoretzak> [blo <https://juanabasolo.netlify.com/>][gak <http://bosgarrena.blogspot.com/>] [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...+++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/head.S @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include <asm/config.h> #include <asm/page.h> #include <asm/processor-ca15.h> +#include <asm/processor-ca7.h> #include <asm/asm_defns.h> #define ZIMAGE_MAGIC_NUMBER 0x016f2818 @@ -185,18 +186,36 @@ hyp: blo 1b skip_bss: - PRINT("- Setting up control registers -\r\n") - /* Read CPU ID */ - mrc CP32(r0, MIDR) - ldr r1, =(MIDR_MASK) - and r0, r0, r1 - /* Is this a Cortex A15? */ - ldr r1, =(CORTEX_A15_ID) - teq r0, r1 -...

...test case. >> In the source it says "If the predecessor is an indirect goto, we >> can't split the edge. >> <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/JumpThreading_8cpp_source.html#l00914>" >> Why would that be the case? > > Splitting an edge creates a block which executes when leaving a > specific block to go to a specific successor. The only way to split an > indirect goto is to insert code before the jump which checks for a > specific destination address. This is very likely to be a pessimization. Do you mean like turning a indirectbr %a...

...__stdev64 (st_dev); + unsigned char __pad0[4]; + + unsigned long __st_ino; + + unsigned int st_mode; + unsigned int st_nlink; + + unsigned long st_uid; + unsigned long st_gid; + + __stdev64 (st_rdev); + unsigned char __pad3[4]; + + long long st_size; + unsigned long st_blksize; + + unsigned long st_blocks; /* Number 512-byte blocks allocated. */ + unsigned long __pad4; /* future possible st_blocks high bits */ + + struct timespec st_atim; + struct timespec st_mtim; + struct timespec st_ctim; + + unsigned long long st_ino; +}; + +#endif diff --git a/usr/include/arch/cris/klibc/archsys.h b/usr/inc...

...__stdev64 (st_dev); - unsigned char __pad0[4]; - - unsigned long __st_ino; - - unsigned int st_mode; - unsigned int st_nlink; - - unsigned long st_uid; - unsigned long st_gid; - - __stdev64 (st_rdev); - unsigned char __pad3[4]; - - long long st_size; - unsigned long st_blksize; - - unsigned long st_blocks; /* Number 512-byte blocks allocated. */ - unsigned long __pad4; /* future possible st_blocks high bits */ - - struct timespec st_atim; - struct timespec st_mtim; - struct timespec st_ctim; - - unsigned long long st_ino; -}; - -#endif diff --git a/usr/klibc/README.klibc b/usr/klibc/README.klibc...

...ke JumpThreading at least attempts to thread across indirect branches. You can either try to fix it or file a bug with your test case. > In the source it says "If the predecessor is an indirect goto, we can't split the edge." Why would that be the case? Splitting an edge creates a block which executes when leaving a specific block to go to a specific successor. The only way to split an indirect goto is to insert code before the jump which checks for a specific destination address. This is very likely to be a pessimization. To answer your original question, the current impleme...

...the object X that it designates, ..., > > then the following requirements apply: ... Every other lvalue > > used to access the value of X shall also have its address based on > > P. > > [end from C] > > > > Where B is defined in 6.7.3.1p2 to be, essentially, the block in > > which the relevant declaration appears. And we can really only > > extrapolate from that to the other access in that block, and not to > > the containing block. > > > > > > Inside that block > > (the lifetime of P) , it is safe to assume that X i...

...t the start of the stream I set all necessary headers). The generated file, however, does not seem to be valid and does not play. Could somebody verify that my encoding logic is sound? Here is the C source on GitHub (based on libvorbis encoder_example.c) : https://github.com/mateusz-/vorbisenc.js/blob/master/encoder_example.c And, if it helps, here is the corrupted/invalid Ogg file : https://raw.github.com/mateusz-/vorbisenc.js/master/audio.ogg Thank you, Mateusz --0050450162ce51772604d594982a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello,<d...

...ble) + dsb + mov pc, lr + +ENTRY(cpu_flush_tlb_range) + dsb +1: +#ifndef SMP + mcr p15, 0, r0, c8, c6, 1 @ TLB invalidate D MVA + mcr p15, 0, r0, c8, c5, 1 @ TLB invalidate I MVA +#else + mcr p15, 0, r0, c8, c3, 1 @ TLB invalidate U MVA (shareable) +#endif + add r0, r0, #PAGE_SZ + cmp r0, r1 + blo 1b + mov ip, #0 + mcr p15, 0, ip, c7, c5, 6 @ flush BTAC/BTB (shareable) + dsb + isb + mov pc, lr + _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...} > > > > It should, no? by virtue of x2 being restrict you know that *x2 > > doesn't alias A, and *x1 is A. > > No, it doesn't. The fact that x2 is restrict does not mean that it > does not alias with any other potential accesses from variables live > in its block. It only means it does not alias with other accesses > with that occur in the block where x2 is live. There is no access to > A or x1 in that block, so we can say nothing about it. > > > > It does. You can assume x2 is not aliased to A and still get > well-defined semantic...

...quot;If the predecessor is an indirect goto, we can't split the edge. <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/JumpThreading_8cpp_source.html#l00914>" Why would that be the case? -- Carlo Alberto Ferraris <cafxx at strayorange.com <mailto:cafxx at strayorange.com>> website/blog <http://cafxx.strayorange.com> - +39 333 7643 235 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110707/ccae877a/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was s...

...it or file a bug with your test case. >>> In the source it says "If the predecessor is an indirect goto, we can't split the edge. <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/JumpThreading_8cpp_source.html#l00914>" Why would that be the case? >> Splitting an edge creates a block which executes when leaving a >> specific block to go to a specific successor. The only way to split an >> indirect goto is to insert code before the jump which checks for a >> specific destination address. This is very likely to be a pessimization. > Do you mean like turning...