search for: blasphemi

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "blasphemi".

Did you mean: blasphemy
2007 May 16
2
[Blasphemy] Can I build dovecot with "-fstack-protector"?
I tried building dovecot using : CPPFLAGS="-fstack-protector" LDFLAGS="-lssp" ./configure That would result in a proper build, yet the binary would complain once being run: dlopen(/usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so) failed: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol: __stack_chk_fail_local Error: imap dump-capability process returned
2006 Mar 06
3
Two asterisks on one machine
...ccess to the same ports and ip addresses. Does anyone know to do this or has done this before? Please share your experiences please. With warm regards. Vivek J. Joshi. vivek@staff.ownmail.com Trikon electronics Pvt. Ltd. --New opinions often appear first as jokes and fancies, then as blasphemies and treason, then as questions open to discussion, and finally as established truths.
2016 Jul 17
2
doveadm feature request: move mailbox between users
...and graft some branches of the [Maildir] folder structure between users. For instance, when a user leaves an organization, some of their mailboxes must ne copied/moved to varius coleagues in order to ensure business continuity -- Ciao, luigi / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ All great truths begin as blasphemies. --George Bernard Shaw
2011 Feb 02
4
Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
Hello CentOS Community Members, What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient code base for such important programs as BIND et al? A similar problem (to BZ561299) was first reported five (5) years ago on the isc.org mailing list. Is there any support among the CentOS community for a REPO of current vintage for such important functions as BIND et al? That question is
2017 Apr 01
2
[RFC] I've made a huge mistake
LLVM-Dev, I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news. I've spent the last several months in severe denial of the problem and I just can't keep denying it to myself anymore. I've made a huge mistake. We never should have removed autoconf support. I've come to this conclusion after a great deal of thoughtful reflection on the impact of our CMake build system over the last year.
2009 Feb 23
5
Application Database?
Hey Everyone, I was looking at the App Database : http://appdb.winehq.org/ I was wondering if the rankings for Guild Wars (Platinum) and Everquest (Gold) and other programs etc. were applicable to the Mac OS X platform as well as Ubuntu Linux. When I click on information, the distributions only list Unbuntu and Linux systems. Thanks.
2016 Jul 17
2
doveadm feature request: move mailbox between users
A feature request for doveadm: move (or copy) mailboxes between users Something like: doveadm movemailbox -s User1 -d User2 Old/Mail/Box Destin/Ation/Path (the same with copymailbox) Or something like that is already possible? -- Ciao, luigi / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required. --Sir Winston Churchill
2006 Jul 05
0
Problem with coxme
------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:09:14 -0500 (CDT) From: Terry Therneau <therneau at mayo.edu> Subject: RE: Problem with coxme To: jhz22 at medschl.cam.ac.uk Cc: R-help at stat.mat.ethz.ch, liulei at virginia.edu, spencer.graves at pdf.com Content-MD5: BXKVsHtW/1I9mIUqrXBU0g== The original question involved a strange error message from coxme
2011 Feb 18
4
Matrix in R
Hi everyone, I'm building a matrix in R with a cycle for like this: pp_ris2=matrix(NA,6,6) for(i in 0:6){ for(j in 0:6){ if(i>j){ pp_ris2[i,j]=myfunction} else if(i==j){ print(c(i,j)) pp_ris2[i,j]=myfunction} }} but the result is: [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [1,] 0.062 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN [2,] 0.083 0.022 NaN NaN NaN NaN [3,]
2006 Sep 12
0
Bug#330220: same problem (solution ?)
hi, the owner of /var/lock/logcheck should be logcheck.logcheck not root.root chowing it, solved the problem on my side. :) p -- ++ Blog: http://blog.rsise.anu.edu.au/?q=pietro ++ ++ "All great truths begin as blasphemies." -George Bernard Shaw ++ Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
2004 Sep 10
2
Inclusion of debian packaging info (was Re: libFLAC docs)
>This question comes up regularly on the Debian mailing lists, and there are >arguments for both approaches. I am against the practice of including a >debian/ directory in upstream source distributions for the following >reasons: >- For the same reason, the Debian maintainer would have to have write access to > the upstream CVS repository. This is often otherwise unnecessary
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: Inclusion of debian packaging info
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:33:15AM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > it's hard enough for the average user to find out how to compile > > source > > packages and checkout from CVS. The Ogg sources also includes a > > debian/ > > dir and it was much easier to build deb packages from this. Sorry, I'm just coming in in the middle of this, but I second any
2003 Apr 14
6
Charts to M$Word - what's the best format
Hi I'm exporting some graphs from R to M$Word. I used png, jpeg and bmp and the quality is poor when comparing with the postscript. What is the best way to export a chart to be included in a M$Word file ? Thanks EJ
2005 Nov 15
2
OggPCM2 : chunked vs interleaved data
Michael Smith wrote: >Whilst I accept that there are many good uses for chunked data, I >think the transformation is trivial, particularly given certain >characteristics of the Ogg container. Remember, the data, if you read >an ogg stream into memory, is _already_ likely to be non-contiguous, >due to ogg's structure. It's trivial, and has insignificant additional
2004 Apr 13
0
FWD IMQ mail on netdev
>From netdev@oss.sgi.com: ----- Forwarded message from jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> ----- X-Original-To: sebek@localhost X-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:25:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: (Long) ANNOUNCE: IMQ replacement WAS(Re: [RFC/PATCH] IMQ port to 2.6 From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@sectorb.msk.ru> Cc:
2016 Feb 09
2
LXC on CentOS 7 HowTo: PAM Configuration
Hi, I am trying to implement something like an "LXC on CentOS 7 HowTo" for internal use. (Might as well get public afterwards.) I am following the HowTo for CentOS 6 (https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/LXC-on-CentOS6). So, here's what I did so far (Steps 1-6 can easily be omitted, but I am trying to be complete.) 1.) Disable delta RPM's in /etc/yum.conf 2.) Remove LibreOffice
2005 Dec 30
6
Suggestion for New User
I, like many people, am starting to learn Ruby because of Rails. I am going through several tutorials and am understanding the concepts without too much difficulty, but the one area I am having trouble with is learning the new language. I am not a trained programmer. Rather, I learned how to program out of necessity and therefore lack some of the background that many of you have. I am
2006 Mar 08
23
rubynuby == I''m a''scared to set it all up...
I''ve been mostly lurking here with an occasional nuby question for a few weeks now. It seems like Ruby and Rails and the many libraries and tools growing up around it are a remarkable toolset. Unfortunately I''m finding the whole enchilada a bit daunting. It seems that if one is to truly tap into the power of this thing and do a significant amount of developing, one needs
2017 Nov 17
11
[RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Add virtio-iommu driver
Implement the virtio-iommu driver following version 0.5 of the specification [1]. Previous version of this code was sent back in April [2], implementing the first public RFC. Since then there has been lots of progress and discussion on the specification side, and I think the driver is in a good shape now. The reason patches 1-3 are only RFC is that I'm waiting on feedback from the Virtio TC
2017 Nov 17
11
[RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Add virtio-iommu driver
Implement the virtio-iommu driver following version 0.5 of the specification [1]. Previous version of this code was sent back in April [2], implementing the first public RFC. Since then there has been lots of progress and discussion on the specification side, and I think the driver is in a good shape now. The reason patches 1-3 are only RFC is that I'm waiting on feedback from the Virtio TC