search for: blasphemy

...would complain once being run: dlopen(/usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so) failed: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol: __stack_chk_fail_local Error: imap dump-capability process returned 89 and the like. So: Is it possible at all? And sorry for the blasphemy of daring to ask this in the first place :) -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Ralf.Hildebrandt at charite.de) plonk at charite.de Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 http://www.arschkrebs.de First Law of System Requirements: "Anything is possible if...

Hello friends, Can I run two asterisks running simultaneously on the same machine? I want one to run v1.0.2 for h323 ( which is an old and running production system ) and one for sip implementation. I wonder how it can be done since they will want access to the same ports and ip addresses. Does anyone know to do this or has done this before? Please share your experiences please.

aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote on 17/07/2016 12:37: >> A feature request for doveadm: move (or copy) mailboxes between users >> >> Something like: >> >> doveadm movemailbox -s User1 -d User2 Old/Mail/Box Destin/Ation/Path > You can do this with > - mailbox create > - move > - delete See thread "Moving Maildir folders" The problem is to

...unity for a REPO of current vintage for such important functions as BIND et al? That question is based on the presumption that time is taking us to a more complete and correct implementation of the basic functions like DNS. IOW, is CentOS philosophy of tracking RH so nailed-to-the-wall that it is blasphemy to propose a REPO of current editions of certain very important functions? kind regards/ldv A quote from a long term mentor now at Internet2: "It's fundamentally wrong for RedHat to attempt to backport security patches for such a fundamental service. I'd cuss a blue streak about thi...

...but not writing code in a terminal is something completely different. (2) CMake's scripting language has made our build system support all these crazy use cases that I never dreamed of, and they're kinda scary. Did you know that people are cross-compiling arm-Linux toolchains from Darwin? Blasphemy! (3) The CMake open source community is too responsive! I file bugs and they fix them. This is unacceptable. Since they fix my bug reports I can't claim to my boss that I'm blocked on someone outside the company fixing something anymore. This is a really big problem detracting from my foam...

Hey Everyone, I was looking at the App Database : http://appdb.winehq.org/ I was wondering if the rankings for Guild Wars (Platinum) and Everquest (Gold) and other programs etc. were applicable to the Mac OS X platform as well as Ubuntu Linux. When I click on information, the distributions only list Unbuntu and Linux systems. Thanks.

A feature request for doveadm: move (or copy) mailboxes between users Something like: doveadm movemailbox -s User1 -d User2 Old/Mail/Box Destin/Ation/Path (the same with copymailbox) Or something like that is already possible? -- Ciao, luigi / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required. --Sir Winston Churchill

...r down in the routine after it has gotton thoroughly confused. c. the actual error message is interesting, as an example of just how odd the error message from a confused routine can be; but has no other use. Thanks to Jing Zhao who forwarded the message on to me, as I prefer Splus (blasphemy!) and don't monitor the r-help list, and also to Spencer Graves and others who tried to further identify the bug. Terry Therneau Mayo Clinic (author of coxme) PS Random slopes are on my "to do" list, and in fact most of the infrastructure for them is already built into...

Hi everyone, I'm building a matrix in R with a cycle for like this: pp_ris2=matrix(NA,6,6) for(i in 0:6){ for(j in 0:6){ if(i>j){ pp_ris2[i,j]=myfunction} else if(i==j){ print(c(i,j)) pp_ris2[i,j]=myfunction} }} but the result is: [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [1,] 0.062 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN [2,] 0.083 0.022 NaN NaN NaN NaN [3,]

hi, the owner of /var/lock/logcheck should be logcheck.logcheck not root.root chowing it, solved the problem on my side. :) p -- ++ Blog: http://blog.rsise.anu.edu.au/?q=pietro ++ ++ "All great truths begin as blasphemies." -George Bernard Shaw ++ Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

>This question comes up regularly on the Debian mailing lists, and there are >arguments for both approaches. I am against the practice of including a >debian/ directory in upstream source distributions for the following >reasons: >- For the same reason, the Debian maintainer would have to have write access to > the upstream CVS repository. This is often otherwise unnecessary

...> --prefix=/some/temp/place && make && make install and just run out > of there. I guess it's slightly more complicated with flac because > of the plugin but not too bad. For those of us who use debian, the idea of installing something not in packaged form is almost blasphemy :) -- cae at bklyn dot org | Caleb Epstein | bklyn . org | Brooklyn Dust Bunny Mfg.

Hi I'm exporting some graphs from R to M$Word. I used png, jpeg and bmp and the quality is poor when comparing with the postscript. What is the best way to export a chart to be included in a M$Word file ? Thanks EJ

Michael Smith wrote: >Whilst I accept that there are many good uses for chunked data, I >think the transformation is trivial, particularly given certain >characteristics of the Ogg container. Remember, the data, if you read >an ogg stream into memory, is _already_ likely to be non-contiguous, >due to ogg's structure. It's trivial, and has insignificant additional

...of obstrutiveness from IMQ as is today. The code added by this is small (100 or less lines on top of dummy) and doesnt touch any of the main core bits. 2) testing of the above by people who use IMQ 3) If someone has better ideas - i am not religious about keeping this; but it certainly cant be the blasphemy that IMQ introduces. I have also introduced hooks to easily add a -i <input dev> to tc classifiers - still on the TODO list. So on the egress you could now classify based on which incoming device the packet arrived on. cheers, jamal On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 17:26, jamal wrote: >> On S...

Hi, I am trying to implement something like an "LXC on CentOS 7 HowTo" for internal use. (Might as well get public afterwards.) I am following the HowTo for CentOS 6 (https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/LXC-on-CentOS6). So, here's what I did so far (Steps 1-6 can easily be omitted, but I am trying to be complete.) 1.) Disable delta RPM's in /etc/yum.conf 2.) Remove LibreOffice

I, like many people, am starting to learn Ruby because of Rails. I am going through several tutorials and am understanding the concepts without too much difficulty, but the one area I am having trouble with is learning the new language. I am not a trained programmer. Rather, I learned how to program out of necessity and therefore lack some of the background that many of you have. I am

I''ve been mostly lurking here with an occasional nuby question for a few weeks now. It seems like Ruby and Rails and the many libraries and tools growing up around it are a remarkable toolset. Unfortunately I''m finding the whole enchilada a bit daunting. It seems that if one is to truly tap into the power of this thing and do a significant amount of developing, one needs

Implement the virtio-iommu driver following version 0.5 of the specification [1]. Previous version of this code was sent back in April [2], implementing the first public RFC. Since then there has been lots of progress and discussion on the specification side, and I think the driver is in a good shape now. The reason patches 1-3 are only RFC is that I'm waiting on feedback from the Virtio TC

Implement the virtio-iommu driver following version 0.5 of the specification [1]. Previous version of this code was sent back in April [2], implementing the first public RFC. Since then there has been lots of progress and discussion on the specification side, and I think the driver is in a good shape now. The reason patches 1-3 are only RFC is that I'm waiting on feedback from the Virtio TC