search for: blanketly

# Your mailer is set to "none" (default on Windows), # hence we cannot send the bug report directly from R. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs@r-project.org # ###################################################### The multcomp functions work on "lm" objects as anticipated. They do not work on

I am not sure whether there is a bug. When I tested the example given for "glht" in the help, I entered the following error: Running commands: amod <- aov(minutes ~ blanket, data = recovery) rht <- glht(amod, linfct = mcp(blanket = "Dunnett"), alternative = "less") Errors are: Error in try(coef.(model)) : could not find function

I am not sure whether there is a bug. When I tested the example given for "glht" in the help, I entered the following error: Running commands: amod <- aov(minutes ~ blanket, data = recovery) rht <- glht(amod, linfct = mcp(blanket = "Dunnett"), alternative = "less") Errors are: Error in try(coef.(model)) : could not find function

With reference to R News News: R version 3.0.0 (Masked Marvel) has been released on 2013-04-03. R version 2.15.3 (Security Blanket) has been released on 2013-03-01 R version 2.15.2 (Trick or Treat) .... R version 2.15.1 ("Roasted Marshmallows") ... R version 2.15.0 ("Easter Beagle") R version 2.14.0 ("Great Pumpkin") Dear R help List, How are these version types

Is there a straightforward way to disallow the deletion of all IMAP mailboxes? I have a user who's deleted an important IMAP mailbox and I'm now recovering a recent copy from the backup. But I'd rather just blanket disallow all folder deletions. The user is using Thunderbird and this has happened more than once so I suspect Tbird is willing to let a folder get deleted too easily.

Howdy, It appears that CentOS 5.2's support for the RTL8111B/C chip is incomplete. The wiki has some blanket statements regarding this support: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/CentOS5/RealTek/r1000 http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/RealTekRTL8111b I could dive in an make the changes *I* think need to happen but I'd like to talk to people

Hi Developers, This is to clarify which patches may be merged into the 3.5 branch. * All doc changes may go in. In fact, you’re encouraged to update the branch's ReleaseNotes.rst file! :-) * All non-documentation patches should first receive approval from the appropriate code maintainer. (A blanket approval is acceptable for the first phase of testing.) * If your patch fixes a major bug,

Hi All, I am one of the contributors to the FastR project ( https://bitbucket.org/allr <https://bitbucket.org/allr.>) and I have encountered an interesting issue when trying to implement vector accesses within FastR. I am trying to understand what kind of error message should be generated for the following expression: x<-1:4; x[[1]]<-NULL; x In order to determine the error message,

On Oct 17, 2009, at 1:32 AM, Owen Anderson wrote: > Chris, > > On Oct 15, 2009, at 8:45 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> Unfortunately, we found out at the last minute that Apple has a rule >> which prevents its engineers from giving video taped talks or >> distributing slides. We will hold onto the video and slide assets in >> case this rule changes in the future.

Hi there Is it fair to compare the 2 solutions using Solaris 10 U2 and a commercial database (SAP SD scenario). The cache on the HW raid helps, and the CPU load is less... but the solution costs more and you _might_ not need the performance of the HW RAID. Has anybody with access to these units done a benchmark comparing the performance (and with the pricelist in hand) came to a conclusion.

Chris, On Oct 15, 2009, at 8:45 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Unfortunately, we found out at the last minute that Apple has a rule > which prevents its engineers from giving video taped talks or > distributing slides. We will hold onto the video and slide assets in > case this rule changes in the future. While I'm glad to know we all share similar sentiments on this, lots of

with ipv6, you just allow the specific ports destined to the specific local machine(s) in on your WAN side, they don't need translating. same sort of rule as if you had a internet-facing service running on the routing system On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:55 AM Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> wrote: > I finally got an ISP connection with working IPv6 and now I need to add

Hey Guys, I am looking to put together a set of guidelines for posting on the CentOS Mailing Lists. The aim being that we come up with a framework that is then enforceable by a moderator, should the need arise. Blanket user / thread moderation is something that I dont really want to enforce here - but might be a necessary evil, over a short period of time. End of the day, we are all educated

Hi, I would like some suggestions. I''m wondering if it''s better to upload a file directly into a database or to put the file into the server and keep the path in the database? Thanks, Eric -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi All,  In order to compare two different logistic regressions, I think I need to compare them based on their BIC values, but I am not sure if the smaller BIC would mean a better model or the reverse is true? Thanks a lot,Andra [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Earlier today while listening to CBC radio's national science show "Quirks and Quarks", I was pleasantly surprised to hear that their audio archives are now offered in Ogg, in addition to mp3 and real. This is the first CBC show that I am aware of that offers their archives in formats other than the usual real/wma/qt. For those who don't know, CBC is Canada's only

Hi all, I''m a relative noob to rails so I apologize in advance for asking such a basic question. I am trying to do multiple AJAX calls using the link_to_remote helper or the JavaScript generator update_page. I have googled and read the docs for both, but can''t seem to figure out exactly what i need to do. Say I have the following html: <div

On 08/06/2013 06:38 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > On 07/31/2013 11:01 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: >> That is, the first network can reach all other networks (just because it >> happens to be the first one defined). Is this the intention (only >> default can talk to the others but not the other way around)? > *Bump* > > I found this excellent post by Daniel Berrange: >

Hello, I''ve been doing some tests on a firewall system running Shorewall 1.4, and have been getting some unexpected behavior when enabling the "newnotsyn" option. In the test setup, I have: ---------------------------------------- /etc/shorewall/interfaces net eth0 detect routefilter,tcpflags,blacklist loc eth1 10.0.0.255 dhcp,tcpflags,newnotsyn

On 8/26/2015 5:30 PM, Always Learning wrote: > Easier just to block Digital Ocean for port 25 - as I have previously > done for all port 80 traffic. you realize Digital Ocean is a rather large virtual private server provider? wikipedia says they host over 190,000 sites, and last year surpassed Rackspace to become the 4th largest hosting provider. a blanket block of /16 subnets is