search for: bith

I have two DELL servers with two Ethernet ports in it. Bith servers have CENTOS 4.5 installed. First Ethernet port connect to public Ethernet line and work correctly. Second Ethernet port I connect point-to-point as private Ethernet (cable direct connect without router or switch). Private Ethernet use IP asddress 1.1.1.1 and 1.1.1.2. I check "ifcon...

...n connects to ours to deliver. Obviously, the IPs of that service are entered as RELAY in the sendmail config. Here is my question: We are still getting a lot of direct spam. Being that only account holders and the spam filtering servers should be connecting, I started blocking various connections bith in /etc/mail/access and in pf. However, I soon saw that I'll need to block the en tire Internet IP space. Blocking by IP is a problem for a small number of nomad users whose IP may just be in China, Russia or Argentina at some point. I was thinking of closing port 25 and using an alternate por...

...ectory" using %LogonUser% via a group profile. That deosn't seem to be working, but I don't know if it's related. > > One other thing, I cannot remember asking if Apparmor or Selinux is > installed and enabled. > > Rowland I tried sestatus and apparmor_status and bith returned 'command not found' so I assume they're not running. I installed Debian 9 from the LiveCD with the cinnamon desktop.

...gt; know if it's related. > >> > > >> > One other thing, I cannot remember asking if Apparmor or > Selinux is > >> > installed and enabled. > >> > > >> > Rowland > >> > >> I tried sestatus and apparmor_status and bith returned 'command not > >> found' > >> so I assume they're not running. I installed Debian 9 > from the LiveCD > >> with the cinnamon desktop. > > > > OK, it is late here, but just in case something has > changed, I will set > > up...

FYI: Compiled version 3.3 on Solaris 8 Sparc and Intel, installed and tested the 'jailed' option (UsePrivilegeSeparation yes) hardcoded user=noaccess and dir /var/spool/sshd Openssl version 0.9.6 Using /dev/urandom C-compiler: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 On Sparc tested bith 32-bits and 64-bits Running for the last 2 hours and no problem reported by the users... -- Kind regards, Luc Suryo

...he usual time, 12 Noon ET on Friday April 3rd, we expect Michael Robertson to join the discussion to filed questions about OpenSky and Gizmo5. I have been testing all of these Skype to X methods except SIP for Skype since I have no word from them. I can tell you that we've had good results with bith Skype for Asterisk and OpenSky. In fact, I am currently accepting calls to my hosted pbx from Skype and Google Voice via the Gizmo and OpenSky platform and I'm very pleased with the results. In fact, we may cut our low traffic tollfree numbers entirely in favor of such services. While not all...

...ng happens ! i use the CVS version from yesterday. i've no windows on my box ! the installdialog stops at the prompt : content of packages gets read. can enyone help ? how do i install it ? i ran 'wine flash5-trialG.exe' and in the setup i set desktop to 640x480 (does that matter ?) bith best reguards M.Angermann

...up profile. That deosn't seem to be working, but I don't > know if it's related. > > > > One other thing, I cannot remember asking if Apparmor or Selinux is > > installed and enabled. > > > > Rowland > > I tried sestatus and apparmor_status and bith returned 'command not > found' > so I assume they're not running. I installed Debian 9 from the LiveCD > with the cinnamon desktop. OK, it is late here, but just in case something has changed, I will set up a new Debian 9 VM tommorrow, install the distro Samba Packages and f...

...>> >> > >> >> > One other thing, I cannot remember asking if Apparmor or >> Selinux is >> >> > installed and enabled. >> >> > >> >> > Rowland >> >> >> >> I tried sestatus and apparmor_status and bith returned 'command not >> >> found' >> >> so I assume they're not running. I installed Debian 9 >> from the LiveCD >> >> with the cinnamon desktop. >> > >> > OK, it is late here, but just in case something has >> changed,...

On 2019-02-19 3:47 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:25:51 -0500 >> What exactly does "START AGAIN" imply? Just chmod? > > 'ls' shows the correct ownership and Unix permissions: > > drwxrwx---+ 4 root domain admins 4096 Feb 17 19:13 programs > > But 'getfacl' show something different: > > getfacl:

Alexander Chemeris wrote: > Hi, > > On 5/27/08, Thorvald Natvig <thorvald at natvig.com> wrote: > >> And here's a patch for Intel Math Kernel Library. This allows commercial >> users of Speex to use a high-speed FFT library that isn't GPL'd. (You do >> need to pay for it though). This is 3 times faster than the default FFT in >> speex, and

CentOS-6 When I login as root I see this prompt: [root at vhost04 ~]# When I login as a non-priviledged user I see this instead: sh-4.1$ .bashrc and .bash_profile have identical contents in /root and /home/user. What causes the difference? Why? How does one change the default so that all normal users get a [userid at hostname pwd]$ prompt? I have loked in/etc/profile.d and /etc/bashrc

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41585 Summary: X freeze and PGRAPH errors in dmesg Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org