search for: bit_

It appears that Mongrel is now the default development server for Rails as of 2.x. I''m assuming this because I''m unable to run Mongrel (for reasons I don''t totally understand yet - I am running Windows and I keep getting asked for MSVCR80.dll which is a _64 bit_ dll on my Win XP machine) and if I issue ruby script/server, I see the same errors that I get when I try to start Mongrel. Is Mongrel the new default for the Rails development server, and if so, how can I continue to run WEBrick under Rails 2.x? Thanks, Wes -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.co...

...he rules doesn't mean you can't just read the words of the standard. You don't have to guess. The standard is meant to be fairly accessible: Every byte has a unique address. 1 The fundamental storage unit in the C++ memory model is the byte. 5 Unless it is a bit-field (_class.bit_), a most derived object shall have a non-zero size and shall occupy one or more bytes of storage. So, let me state is this way, the address _must_ be different. If you can't tell they are not, you are free to have them be the same.

On Oct 15, 2008, at 6:58 AM, Tatu Vaajalahti wrote: >> Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address? I can >> understand that it is surprising that they do, but determining >> whether >> this is legal or not requires reading the language standard. >> Hopefully >> a language lawyer can chime in and say whether this transform is >>

On 15.10.2008, at 16.43, Duncan Sands wrote: >> True, but note that it is the address of a variable that is used, not >> the value. > > Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address? I can > understand that it is surprising that they do, but determining whether > this is legal or not requires reading the language standard. > Hopefully > a language