Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bioclust".
Did you mean:
biclust
2004 Nov 07
2
Using GNU R on a two box "cluster"
Hello,
right now I'm thinking about running R 2.0.0 on box A (Debian SID) but
at the same time having access to the ressources of box B (Ubuntu
Linux) regarding disk capacity, RAM, idle CPU cycles . Is there anyone
of you that has already installed and administred such a tiny (home
based) cluster?
Well, the term cluster seems quite a bit of an exaggeration related to
what I am looking
2011 Mar 11
0
is gzcon w/ urls not implemented or used differently on linux?
...R=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C
[9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
[11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
> system("uname -a")
Linux biocluster 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Jan 25 06:04:33 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Thank you,
Tyler William H Backman
Cheminformatics Programmer
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences
E-mail: tyler.backman at ucr.edu
1207E Genomics Building
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521
2007 Sep 28
0
Proper trunk to connect two systems.
...and treat it as zap. (I should mention that only the main pbx
has digium hardware. The dialer uses ztdummy).
This connection between the two servers will need to support a minimum
of 35 concurrent calls, to eventually 200 concurrent calls. At that
point of course I'll probably be looking at biocluster or other
redundant setups.
I am currently leaning towards TDMoE. If I'm figuring this correctly a
gigabit crossover connection would give me the equivalent of 500 E1
circuits? I wouldn't push it that far, but what would be a reasonable amount to push on it.
Any thoughts?
-dc