search for: bind_dlz

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:29:43 +0100 Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 21/10/16 20:11, Means, Jeffrey D. wrote: > > > > I guess my real question is do I have to have all my DC's running > > either samba_internal or bind_dlz... ie do they have to all run the > > same DNS server software... > > > > > > Simple answer - Yes, all your DCs need to run the same DNS > implementation. Mixing is not supported. You can convert your DCs at > any time but it's probably better to decide before dep...

Hi ! I bounce on the Mr Sloop's post ([Samba] DDNS / DHCPd && Internal DNS or BIND_DLZ) to ask what's the easiest way to allow Linux clients to update themself their DNS record in the Samba4 AD server (with BIND_DLZ Dns server). It works well with windows clients, but with Linux clients joined to the domain, with a valid Kerberos ticket, the client receive a error "ERRO...

Hello is there a way to use dnsvi with samba bind_dlz? When i use this i get error update failed: NOTAUTH

> > Not so much forgetting but not understanding ;-) - Internal DNS that responds to our services (site, moodle, etc) - ns.myinstitution.edu (registered in registro.br) - Samba DNS answering for samba stuff - addc.myinstitution.edu Maybe it's better to use SAMBA_INTERNAL instead of BIND_DLZ? On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2017 15:12:38 -0300 > Elias Pereira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I provisioned an samba AD with the bind_dlz opt...

Hello all, I have set up a samba4 server with bind9 and the bind_dlz module. Everything is working as it should but now I need to allow the dhcp server to add entries to the forwarding zone. Has anybody implemented such a configuration ? Can this be done with the kerberos DNS dynamic update configuration. I want to achieve the following: 1) allow non-Windows machi...

...; wrote: > > > >> Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of > >> dependencies for its latest kernel release, apparently because > >> systemd needs it.  Recently, I noticed my first casualty - bind9 - > >> due to apparmor failures with bind_dlz. > >> > >> Knowing next to nothing about apparmor, what is needed to fix this, > >> and what further info do you need from me? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Dale > > I cannot seem to find a debian kernel that has a dependency on > > apparmo...

....org/index.php/DNS_Administration Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > basti via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 11 september 2020 10:13 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] dnsvi and bind_dlz > > we have our own dnsvi based on nsupdate. i have problems with > dns names, > that are exists on dc2 but not on dc1. > > its faster then alwasy use a windows gui :-D > > On 11.09.20 10:06, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > On 11/09/2020 08:31, basti via samba w...

...o has been on-list > and posted back to it. > > I'm pretty sure I didn't change the subject back to my subject when I > helped these people. Did you make sure your email client is working OK? > Or maybe my reply settings are not correct? > > In fact on the subject "Bind_DLZ and two AD DC" you replied just before > I did. > The confusion probably arises from the fact that two of your replies on this thread are in response to 'Means, Jeffrey D.', who doesn't appear to have posted in this thread. In fact, he doesn't appear to have posted to t...

...mba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of >> dependencies for its latest kernel release, apparently because >> systemd needs it.  Recently, I noticed my first casualty - bind9 - >> due to apparmor failures with bind_dlz. >> >> Knowing next to nothing about apparmor, what is needed to fix this, >> and what further info do you need from me? >> >> Thanks, >> Dale > I cannot seem to find a debian kernel that has a dependency on > apparmor, can you provide a link ? > > Ev...

I'm trying to troubleshoot why our workstations have stopped dynamically registering their ip addresses in our AD using bind_dlz setup. It worked for a couple of months and now does not. I realized I have a basic question about how it is supposed to work. Do the workstations (after getting a dynamic address from the dhcpd server) contact the AD DC directly with the information? Or does dhcpd register the address with bind a...

On 27/08/15 20:49, Jim Seymour wrote: > Hi All, > > Well, after going in something of the Wrong Direction, I figure on > starting over. > > Now: Looking at the docs, ISTM that BIND_DLZ is kind of a PITA. So, > being as I need the BIND (server also is the nameserver for the entire > LAN), and the recommendation is to put the AD PDC in a sub-domain, > anyway, I was thinking: > > Run BIND as normal, but bind it to only eth0 > > Set up an eth0:0 (virtua...

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:51:30 +0100 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > ... what you seem > to be missing is that you run bind9 instead of the internal samba4 > DNS server. Whatever DNS server you do use, it needs to only know > about the samba4 dns domain (which also needs to be the realm name), > anything else it gets from its forwarder. I did not miss

...rs: How to get > them into the dlz zone. > > My tld is: htt > My samba dns zone is: home.htt > > I will have a master zone for htt, easy enough to setup as a flat zone > file. Did it before. > > The home.htt zone only seems to exist in ldap and bind_dlz provides > lookup answers by querying ldap. How is the AD DC handled, > homebase.home.htt? I do not see it in the > /usr/share/samba/setup/named* files. Is it already in the ldap > repository? When you provision the domain zones are created for you in AD, have a look in /var/li...

...Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Jim Seymour >Verzonden: maandag 31 augustus 2015 21:21 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: [Samba] Samba AD PDC , LDAP and Single-Sign-On >(was: re: Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ) > >On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:03:39 -0400 >Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > >> >> On 08/27/2015 08:45 PM, Jim Seymour wrote: >> > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:00:28 -0400 >> > Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >>...

On 21/10/16 20:02, Means, Jeffrey D. wrote: > > Just out of curiosity last night I was messing atoms with my samba > setup and added a second DC to my domain whole the first DC was > running bind_dlz the second was running samba_internal and for some > reason I started seeing keytab failures and lots of issues where DNS > updates were not replicating between the two DC's. Any ideas? > > You should just be able to run the procedure documented on the wiki to change backends, and...

On 21/10/16 20:11, Means, Jeffrey D. wrote: > > I guess my real question is do I have to have all my DC's running > either samba_internal or bind_dlz... ie do they have to all run the > same DNS server software... > > Simple answer - Yes, all your DCs need to run the same DNS implementation. Mixing is not supported. You can convert your DCs at any time but it's probably better to decide before deployment. Cheers Alex -- This mess...

...th. Everything I've replied to has been on-list and posted back to it. I'm pretty sure I didn't change the subject back to my subject when I helped these people. Did you make sure your email client is working OK? Or maybe my reply settings are not correct? In fact on the subject "Bind_DLZ and two AD DC" you replied just before I did. Are you in fact annoyed that someone outside of the Samba team helped out a user? Do I have to wait for an official Samba person to reply and approve before I answer someone's query? I am just trying to contribute as I've been asking a lo...

On 22/10/16 08:44, Michael Howard via samba wrote: > >> In fact on the subject "Bind_DLZ and two AD DC" you replied just before >> I did. >> > The confusion probably arises from the fact that two of your replies > on this thread are in response to 'Means, Jeffrey D.', who doesn't > appear to have posted in this thread. > In fact, he doesn't...

Hi Mark, Am 19.12.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Mark Nienberg via samba: > I'm trying to troubleshoot why our workstations have stopped dynamically > registering their ip addresses in our AD using bind_dlz setup. It worked > for a couple of months and now does not. I realized I have a basic question > about how it is supposed to work. > > Do the workstations (after getting a dynamic address from the dhcpd server) > contact the AD DC directly with the information? Or does dhcpd registe...

...own dnsvi based on nsupdate. i have problems with dns names, that are exists on dc2 but not on dc1. its faster then alwasy use a windows gui :-D On 11.09.20 10:06, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/09/2020 08:31, basti via samba wrote: >> Hello is there a way to use dnsvi with samba bind_dlz? >> When i use this i get error update failed: NOTAUTH >> > I first asked 'what is dnsvi ?', a quick google later turned up this > git-hub page: https://github.com/df7cb/dnsvi > > Not sure I would even want to try to make it work, this is going to be > really slo...