Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "bind9_8".
Did you mean:
bind9.8
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...ubprocess.Popen(['named -V'], shell=True,
stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
cwd='.').communicate()[0]
bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
bind9_8 = '#'
bind9_9 = '#'
bind9_10 = '#'
bind9_11 = '#'
bind9_12 = '#'
bind9_14 = '#'
bind9_16 = '#'
bind9_18 = '#'
if bind_info.upper().find('BIND 9.8') != -1:...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...ed -V'], shell=True,
> ???????????????????????????????????? stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
> ???????????????????????????????????? stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
> ???????????????????????????????????? cwd='.').communicate()[0]
> ??????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
> ??????? bind9_8 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_9 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_10 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_11 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_12 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_14 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_16 = '#'
> ??????? bind9_18 = '#'
> ??????? if bind_info....
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...rue,
>> ????????????????????????????????????? stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
>> ????????????????????????????????????? stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
>> ????????????????????????????????????? cwd='.').communicate()[0]
>> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
>> ???????? bind9_8 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_16 = '#'
>> ???????? bind9_18 = '#'...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
...nd_info = subprocess.Popen(['named -V'], shell=True,
>>> ????????????????????????????????????? stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
>>> stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
>>> cwd='.').communicate()[0]
>>> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
>>> ???????? bind9_8 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#'
>>> ???????? bind9_16 = '#'
>>> ???...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
....Popen(['named -V'], shell=True,
>>>> ????????????????????????????????????? stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
>>>> stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
>>>> cwd='.').communicate()[0]
>>>> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
>>>> ???????? bind9_8 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#'
>>>> ???????? bind9_16 = '...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote:
> Hi to all,
> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba
> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports
> (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors with
> the "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names".
>
> If I install Bind9 in version
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
..._info = subprocess.Popen(['named -V'], shell=True,
>>>>> stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
>>>>> stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
>>>>> cwd='.').communicate()[0]
>>>>> ???????? bind_info = get_string(bind_info)
>>>>> ???????? bind9_8 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_9 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_10 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_11 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_12 = '#'
>>>>> ???????? bind9_14 = '#'
>>>>>...
2020 Sep 10
1
AD-DC with DLZ using Bind9.16.x
..., below, be commented, or the instructions modified?
/usr/share/samba/setup$ cat ./named.conf.dlz
# This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema
# Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version
#
dlz "AD DNS Zone" {
# For BIND 9.8.x
${BIND9_8} database "dlopen ${MODULESDIR}/bind9/dlz_bind9.so";
# For BIND 9.9.x
${BIND9_9} database "dlopen ${MODULESDIR}/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so";
# For BIND 9.10.x
${BIND9_10} database "dlopen ${MODULESDIR}/bind9/dlz_bind9_10.so";
# For BIND 9.11.x...