search for: bind9.8

Hi, I have two samba 4.1.14 DCs (two sites) using Bind9.8.2 (DLZ). I'm having problems with DDNS updates. I already confirmed permissions for named on related files/folders and also the firewall. My named.conf looks like these: < options { listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 10.1.1.150; }; directory "/var/named"; allow-query { any; };

I'm hoping the issue is just load balancing, but I'm not sure. I can't see to get the traffic balanced across two DCs. I ran this script on all Linux nodes to balance the traffic. #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; my $primary_name_server; my $random = int(rand(10)); open(my $resolv_conf_fh, '< /etc/resolv.conf') or die("Unable to open /etc/resolv.conf for

Hi everyone, I need to use samba 4 server, but I need to install a server with a dns service(bind9.8) in other server. Is that possible? If yes, There is any documentation for it? -- Atentamente, Amaury. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ III Escuela Internacional de Invierno en la UCI del 17 al 28 de febrero del 2014. Ver www.uci.cu

Hello, I'm running Samba 4.5.0 and bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1. One DC of four, the PDC, is magnitudes slower running /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names. When that is running on that DC it seems to block any queries. The load average is usually under 0.5. The DC was unsafely halted, which could have corrupted something. I ran a dbcheck with samba-tool and it

Hai? ? Im running:?debian wheezy, sernet samba 4.1.3 , DC, in windows 2008 AD domain. ? Im reading the wiki and i stumbled on this. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns-backend_bind? semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone.jnl the strange thing is, and this is

I've tried to join samba a domain as a DC. I've followed Join_a_domain_as_a_DC How To<http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC#Check_required_DNS_entries_of_the_new_host> . Join domain was successfull, but samba_dnsupdate doesn't work. samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names say dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable I use bind9.8.

Hi, just a short update on this issue: By using strace and having a look at the source code, I found the reason for the named error: Accessing samba database via ldapi requires the use of ildap.so (samba ldb module, which is not located in "standard ldb modules path"). Just setting LDB_MODULES_PATH to the directory containing it makes named start: export

Hai. ? Im trying to add my samba to a win 2008R2 domain. ? Im following howto, but its not clear.? ? what i did already. did read ( and follow http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC?) 1 installed samba and its packages, ( sernet samba is used ) ( apt-get install sernet-samba-ad , extra are installed also ) samba -V gives :? Version 4.0.10-SerNet-Ubuntu-6.precise?

Version 4.0.0alpha18-GIT-e75c436 Ubuntu 11.10 Built now with make clean ./configure.developer make make install samba -i -d3 gives this: ldb: unable to stat module ${PREFIX}/modules/ldb : No such file or directory ldb_wrap open of privilege.ldb samba: using 'standard' process model Unknown process model 'standard' my $PREFIX should be /usr/local/samba I think. The path is

Hi Karl Im running for years with samba now with bind_dlz and on stock debian samba and bind runs fine. I went through your mails on the list and i noticed the following. > client006\$\@MY.DOMAIN.DE: updating zone 'MY.DOMAIN.DE/NONE': update > failed: rejected by secure update (REFUSED) > samba_dlz: disallowing update of signer=client006\$\@MY.DOMAIN.DE >

Any help here? I have included all of the output of the suggested diags that Thomas said I should run, but I admit that I'm not sure what I'm looking for, as I'm not familiar with RPC functionality on Linux. Something is not working with RPC on my Samba 4.0.3 server. (FWIW, it doesn't work with IPTables stopped either.) > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Mike Stroven wrote: