Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "bianry".
2006 Apr 20
4
oci8 mac os x intel
Is rails + oci8 + mac os x intel a winning combination? It appears
that oci8 might be a issue.
2009 Jun 16
1
[LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
...using LLVM Table gen and data, and using the
DOCE (Direct Object Code Emission) backends (see LLVM Wiki for details) when
they are ready is a much better solution. I am planning on doing a full tool
set (linker, and librarian anyway) to replace binutils for LLVM on Windows,
and maybe for other bianry formats. Although this will take time, hopefully
we will get more people working on it when there is something basic running
as a proof of concept.
> The above discussion leads me to believe there are fundamental conflicts
> between MASM and gas syntax.
>
> Is NASM any better than MA...
2000 May 10
0
Printing Problem with 2.0.7
We are using Digital Unix 4.0D, and attempted to upgrade to 2.0.7 this
morning. Things apparently worked but we started getting reports of print
jobs dissappearing. Up'ing the debug level we have noticed that in some
invocations of the 'lpr' command, the '%p' is being replaced by '_S'. We
have had to back out again to 1.19
The cfg entries are
print command =
2009 Jun 16
0
[LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 09:48, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Appently the GAS Intel backend has flaws and does not work correctly anyway
> so the X86IntelAsm backend is designed only to target MASM anyway.
gas Intel syntax is indeed broken in LLVM. I'd love to make it work but
my work has not (yet) allocated time for that. Maybe I can hack LLVM on
the weekends. :)
The above discussion leads
2009 Jun 16
3
[LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
>On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Gaster,
>Benedict<Benedict.Gaster at amd.com> wrote:
>> I would like to use the LLVM x86 code generator to emit Intel syntax that
>> is
>> compatible with Microsoft’s MASM 9.x. Taking the TOT LLVM, from last
>> week, I
>> have found a number of changes that are required to make this work, most
>> of
>> which
1998 May 19
7
Bind Overrun Bug and Linux
[mod: Just to show you that people DO get bitten after a bugwarning has
gone out on linux-security..... -- REW]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Has anyone been hit with the Bind Inverse Query Buffer Overrun on
their Linux servers? We have had 3 servers attacked using this
expoit and all of the machines had several binaries replaced with
trojan