Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "bianries".
Did you mean:
barries
2006 Apr 20
4
oci8 mac os x intel
Is rails + oci8 + mac os x intel a winning combination? It appears
that oci8 might be a issue.
2009 Jun 16
1
[LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
> On Tuesday 16 June 2009 09:48, Aaron Gray wrote:
>
>> Appently the GAS Intel backend has flaws and does not work correctly
>> anyway
>> so the X86IntelAsm backend is designed only to target MASM anyway.
>
> gas Intel syntax is indeed broken in LLVM. I'd love to make it work but
> my work has not (yet) allocated time for that. Maybe I can hack LLVM on
>
2000 May 10
0
Printing Problem with 2.0.7
...s
printing = bsd
printcap name = /etc/printcap
[printers]
browseable = no
comment = Computing Services Printers
create mode = 0700
path = /usr/spool/samba
printable = yes
public = no
NB: No changes have been made to printcap or smb.cfg, we simply updated the
binaries.
The bianries were straight out of the box, so to speak, we changed the
--prefix and compiled with ths std DEC C compiler.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Glen Eustace, Systems Engineer - Networking,
Information Technology - Turitea, Massey University,
Private Bag 11222, Pa...
2009 Jun 16
0
[LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 09:48, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Appently the GAS Intel backend has flaws and does not work correctly anyway
> so the X86IntelAsm backend is designed only to target MASM anyway.
gas Intel syntax is indeed broken in LLVM. I'd love to make it work but
my work has not (yet) allocated time for that. Maybe I can hack LLVM on
the weekends. :)
The above discussion leads
2009 Jun 16
3
[LLVMdev] x86 Intel Syntax and MASM 9.x
>On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Gaster,
>Benedict<Benedict.Gaster at amd.com> wrote:
>> I would like to use the LLVM x86 code generator to emit Intel syntax that
>> is
>> compatible with Microsoft’s MASM 9.x. Taking the TOT LLVM, from last
>> week, I
>> have found a number of changes that are required to make this work, most
>> of
>> which
1998 May 19
7
Bind Overrun Bug and Linux
[mod: Just to show you that people DO get bitten after a bugwarning has
gone out on linux-security..... -- REW]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Has anyone been hit with the Bind Inverse Query Buffer Overrun on
their Linux servers? We have had 3 servers attacked using this
expoit and all of the machines had several binaries replaced with
trojan