search for: bhard

Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are applied? mark

...run a report, and see who's using how >> much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are >> applied? > > After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you can issue the > command similar to: > > xfs_quota -x -c "limit bsoft=8g bhard=10g -d" /home > > This command will enable the limits above for all users (-d flag), > except users who have their limits existing already (usually ones who > preformed fs operations). > > For those who already have some limits set you can still can change > these limits,...

...eport, and see who's using how > > much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are > applied? > > > > After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you can issue the > command similar to: > > xfs_quota -x -c "limit bsoft=8g bhard=10g -d" /home > > This command will enable the limits above for all users (-d flag), > except users who have their limits existing already (usually ones who > preformed fs operations). > > For those who already have some limits set you can still can change > these limits,...

...eport, and see who's using how > > much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are > applied? > > > > After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you can issue the > command similar to: > > xfs_quota -x -c "limit bsoft=8g bhard=10g -d" /home > > This command will enable the limits above for all users (-d flag), > except users who have their limits existing already (usually ones who > preformed fs operations). > > For those who already have some limits set you can still can change > these limits,...

...r on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how > much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are applied? > After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you can issue the command similar to: xfs_quota -x -c "limit bsoft=8g bhard=10g -d" /home This command will enable the limits above for all users (-d flag), except users who have their limits existing already (usually ones who preformed fs operations). For those who already have some limits set you can still can change these limits, but with individual command, s...

Hi, I try to enable userquota an a new xfs filesystem. Its centos 6.5, the filesystem is mounted with usrquota, the server was rebooted. I thought xfs_quota -x -c 'limit bsoft=20000m bhard=22000m username' /home would set the quota for that user. But I do get an error: Command limit not found. Did I miss something? Any hints/how to beside the official sgi xfs and redhat doc would be nice. Regards . G?tz -- G?tz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 E-Mail...

...ble to get xfs_quotas to report correctly on a freshly installed, fully patched CentOS 6 box. I have specified all the same options as on another machine which *is* reporting quota LABEL=TEST /exports/TEST xfs inode64,nobarrier,delaylog,usrquota,grpquota 0 0 xfs_quota -xc 'limit -u bsoft=900m bhard=1g user' /exports/TEST however xfs_quota -xc 'report -hu' /exports/ reports back nothing pertaining to the user but if a do a quota user I get information back Disk quotas for user user (uid 67876): Filesystem blocks quota limit grace files quota limit grace /d...

Folks I'm trying to use xfs_quota to keep track of disk space usage for my users. The documentation states that I should specify "uquota" as an option on the mount data in /etc/fstab. Yet, I cannot find the entry in fstab that corresponds to the Logical Volume that ends up being mounted on /home1. The system in question was installed on a single disk system. Later, after

Hi all, is any one aware quotas not working in 5,5? I'm using XFS as a file system. My fstab has the appropriate usrquota,grpquota but when I try to run; quotacheck -cug /foo I get; quotacheck: Can't find filesystem to check or filesystem not mounted with quota option. I already have a large amount of data in the mount. Do quotas get implemented on only empty filesystems and

Hello, I using red-had Linux 8.0 with two IP addresses. On the first IP rsync is listen to port 873 and Apache web server to port 80. What I need to do so that rsync will listen also to port 80 on the second IP address ? Thanks, Addady

...ork "udp" [2001/04/25 16:03:16, 9] smbd/quotas.c:nfs_quotas(367) nfs_quotas: Remote Quotas Failed! Error "0" [2001/04/25 16:03:16, 10] smbd/quotas.c:nfs_quotas(384) nfs_quotas: Let`s look at D a bit closer... status "0" bsize "14" active? "21" bhard "-445513881" bsoft "0" curb "0" [2001/04/25 16:03:16, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/04/25 16:03:16, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 24033 (2.2.0) Please read...

...Bug #652705 {Done: Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <tiago at debian.org>} [ffmpeg2theora] ffmpeg2theora: new upstream version available Changed Bug submitter to 'Rog?rio Brito <rbrito at ime.usp.br>' from 'Rog??rio Brito <rbrito at ime.usp.br>' > submitter 655587 Tobias L?bhard <quirxl at gmail.com> Bug #655587 {Done: Peter S Galbraith <psg at debian.org>} [xtide] xtide: Dependency for xfonts-base package missing Changed Bug submitter to 'Tobias L?bhard <quirxl at gmail.com>' from 'Tobias L??bhard <quirxl at gmail.com>' > submitt...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm (very slowly) working on a kioslave for rsync. At this stage I'm just exec()ing the rsync binary. If you want to know how far I have to go, see: http://www.cuneata.net/rsync-kio.html for the bad news. One question that I'm still grappling with is how to handle motd. I have a very rough heurestic for finding it (everything up to the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have it very roughly working, in that I can browse some directories and download at least some files to view in konqueror. Obligatory screen shot at http://www.cuneata.net/rsync-kio.html It is a basic wrapper around the rsync binary. So I'm not yet getting any real benefit from rsync - I'm effectively always in --whole-file mode. This

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm playing with valgrind, and ran it with rsync. I'm really not sure if I'm understanding either the tool or the code, but here is an example. When we're downloading a file in client-server mode, we end up in main.c::client_run(), doing a call to flist.c::recv_file_list(). Around line 1036, we do a malloc of the file list:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 G'day. Please find attached a basic ethereal dissector for the rsync network (client/server) protocol. I have only lightly tested it. I am not sure how much more time I can spend on this, so I am releasing it "as is". Admitedly, this dissector doesn't do a real lot, but it should provide a basis for identifying further work

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 G'day The attached patch adds "first draft" support for service location protocol, using OpenSLP (http://www.openslp.org). This allows you to automagically discover all the rsync servers on your network (which is defined in terms of your SLP configuration - typically equal to multicast scope, but you can change it around with