search for: bfu

Bfu 91 to 92 looks good Proceed with xVM upgrade . After running:- # sunos.hg/bin/build-all nondebug bash-3.2# cd packages-nondebug bash-3.2# pwd /usr/tmp/packages-nondebug bash-3.2# ls -l total 20 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 512 Jun 21 08:57 SUNWlibvirt drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 51...

Hi All, I have bfu''ed to net-virt_xb-21_snv_81_021308. The dladm command on my machine does not have create-etherstub option. Please let me know what could be the issue. Thanks Khushal

After BFU-ing my system to b75 I ended up with a panicing system when booting into Xen: grub> #---------- ADDED BY BOOTADM - DO NOT EDIT ---------- grub> title Solaris on Xen grub> kernel$ /boot/$ISADIR/xen.gz grub> module$ /platform/i86xpv/kernel/$ISADIR/unix /platform/i86xpv/kernel/$ISADIR/uni...

Hi, I was trying to download the Crossbow ISO from : http://opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/snapshots/ under "Crossbow Beta iso images June 6 2008" and it failed. Does anyone know of a link which is working ? Thanks for any pointers ! Regards, Sanjeev.

...nknown diagnostic) When I truss the process, it looks like it''s failing when attempting to open the vnic pseudo-device: 100878/1: open("/devices/pseudo/vnic at 0:ctl", O_RDWR) Err#2 ENOENT 100878/1: fstat64(2, 0x08046C10) = 0 When I BFU''ed the crossbow image, I ran acr to resolve conflicts. Does anyone happen to know why this device doesn''t exist after the bfu/acr? Are there specific files I need to edit to get things working? Thanks, - Ryan -- UNIX Administrator http://prefetch.net

Author: bonwick Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 242dca7cc19846aa8ae2d792b9486c537b5dad77 Log message: fix bfu cleanup complaint Files: update: usr/src/tools/scripts/bfu.sh

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 06:39:00PM -0700, George Wilson wrote: > Solaris Installation Guide > System Administration Guide: Basic > ZFS Administration Guide > System Administration Guide: Devices and File Systems Where can I get the updated guides? > For further information, visit our OpenSolaris page at: > >

Hi, netvirt-src-20080310.tar.bz2 appears to the last beta release. Is this synced against Build 81 ? Also when is the next beta expected ? Regards, Moinak.

I just went through a BFU update to snv_127 on a V880 : neptune console login: root Password: Nov 3 08:19:12 neptune login: ROOT LOGIN /dev/console Last login: Mon Nov 2 16:40:36 on console Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_127 Nov. 02, 2009 SunOS Internal Development: root 2009-Nov-02 [onnv_127-tonic] bfu'...

I want to list/use the nfs probes but I get the error "dtrace: failed to match nfs*:::: No probe matches description". Is there a way to enable nfs provider probes? My system is running snv_112 (bfu''ed from the gate archive) # dtrace -lP nfs* ID PROVIDER MODULE FUNCTION NAME dtrace: failed to match nfs*:::: No probe matches description thanks Priya

I have tried to define a domain or using virt-install both failed. Could some one give me the correct command to do this? I used: virt-install --nographics --paravirt --os-type=solaris --os-variant=opensolaris --ram 1024 --name cam-host --disk path=/dev/dsk/c0t600A0B800049E902000008EB4A9CE744d0p0,driver=phy -l /export/media_images/sol-nv-b121-x86-dvd.iso thx, florian

...a b84 on my laptop then built latest onnv-gate > on it. > > After I installed it using Install and try to boot, > it panic for don''t know "/xpvd" (hvmboot_rootconf failed) > > Seems b84 don''t support xpvd/xpv, What should I do now, > should I use BFU instead?

Hi All, I am running nevada 79 BFU''ed to 82. The machine is a Ultra 20 with 4GB memory. I have several Windows XP domU''s configured and registered. When ever I try to start the fourth domain I get an out of memory exception: Not enough memory is available, and dom0 cannot be shrunk any further Each of my dom...

...s the *correct* entries to modify in a liveupgrade environment. (there''s also the issue that the ''real'' menu.lst is not always on the currently active BE. I can''t currently work out if that''s dealt with naturally, or not, because of the above). When BFU''ing the xen bits into a liveupgrade BE, the bootadm-created menu.lst entry will be updated for the new booting scheme. The liveupgrade-created entries will not. Additionally, the bootadm-created entries don''t stand much chance of referring to the BE BFU''d with xen b...

I just BFU''ed up to B61 and started to play with IP Instances. I''m having trouble making my zone happy: root at aeon zones$ zoneadm -z testing1 boot zoneadm: zone ''testing1'': WARNING: unable to hold network interface ''skge0''.: Invalid argument root at ae...

Hi. I''m all set for doing performance comparsion between Solaris/ZFS and FreeBSD/ZFS. I spend last few weeks on FreeBSD/ZFS optimizations and I think I''m ready. The machine is 1xQuad-core DELL PowerEdge 1950, 2GB RAM, 15 x 74GB-FC-10K accesses via 2x2Gbit FC links. Unfortunately the links to disks are the bottleneck, so I''m going to use not more than 4 disks, probably.

Joseph Little wrote: > I''d love to "vote" to have this addressed, but apparently votes for > bugs are no available to outsiders. > > What''s limiting Stanford EE''s move to using ZFS entirely for our > snapshoting filesystems and multi-tier storage is the inability to > access .zfs directories and snapshots in particular on NFSv3 clients.

...-630D663FA2A2 at Sun.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OpenSolaris-URL: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=73560&tstart=0#73560 Yep, another "hg pull", followed by a nighly recompile and bfu fixed the problem. The box don''t need libxml2.so or libz.so in /lib any more to mount the zfs /usr filesystem. I had pulled fresh sources on 2006-11-17, immediatelly before the fix for 6494840 went in ;-) > I''ll need to check the exact date and bug number, but a fix has =20...

...e VNIC (with same VLAN ID) on each of these two e1000g1 interface. After I configure IPs on both of these two VNICs, they''re not able to talk to each other: vnic(vid=8,192.168.1.1)<--->e1000g1<------------->e1000g1<--->vnic(vid=8,192.168.1.2) These two machines are both bfu''ed to snv_109-nd. The same configuration works on these two machines before when they are running snv_108. Is this a known issue in 109, or I missed something? Thanks, Max

Hi, I''m trying to BFU my own build of ON onto a snv_104 installation and I''m hitting problems with bnx driver; which is coming from a set of snv_105 closed bins: WARNING: bnx0: Failed to allocate GLD MAC memory. I believe bnx is a closed source GLDv3 driver. Were there any incompatible changes due to th...