search for: benpope81

On Thursday, January 15, 2015 06:55 AM, Nikola Smiljanic wrote: > Was there an rc3 that I missed? > It's not tagged if there was. I've tested and uploaded 3.5.1 final for x86_64-ubuntu-14.04. I think the rc2 build required a newer libstdc++ than exists on Ubuntu 14.04, but the final build should be good. Ben

Many of them are already live: http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#3.5 On 15/01/2015 01:50, Nikola Smiljanic wrote: > In that case are we supposed to build final binaries for 3.5.1? > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com > <mailto:benpope81 at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 15, 2015 06:55 AM, Nikola Smiljanic wrote: > > Was there an rc3 that I missed? > > > It's not tagged if there was. > > I've tested and uploaded 3.5...

On Aug 14, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 02:13 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> I’m sorry for the late announcement. >> >> The binaries for the 3.5 release candidate 2 are now available. Please >> pick them up here and test them out! >> >> http://ll...

...bound I apologize the delay; I've not had a chance to refine my list until this morning. Thanks again, Hal ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > To: "Tom Stellard" <tom at stellard.net> > Cc: "Ben Pope" <benpope81 at gmail.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu, "Erik Verbruggen" <erik.verbruggen at me.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 7:49:36 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 3.4.1 Release Plans > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tom Stellard" <tom at stellard...

...ble: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was provided constexpr duration() : __r() { } ^ 1 error generated. root at no1slu398:~/Documents/LLVM/tmp# cat hello.cpp #include <thread> int main() { return 0; } Regards, Kashyap On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 15/10/13 22:22, C K Kashyap wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am > > running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both > > cases, it looks like the problem is due t...

I've been building clang on linux for a couple of years now, contributing to the testing on Ubuntu, but this one has me stumped: fatal error: 'asm/socket.h' file not found #include <asm/socket.h> [1556/4006] Building CXX object projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.i386.dir/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc.o FAILED:

Hi, I've taken a look at the binary tarballs for clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-* that have been uploaded and observed the following: * All uploaded tarballs include the generated CMake files apart from ``clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz``. These files (share/llvm/cmake/*.cmake) are missing in this tarball. * Inside the Ubuntu tarball the directory is not consistently named

...: __r() { } > ^ > 1 error generated. > root at no1slu398:~/Documents/LLVM/tmp# cat hello.cpp > #include <thread> > > int main() { > return 0; > } > > > Regards, > Kashyap > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 15/10/13 22:22, C K Kashyap wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am >> > running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both >> > cases, it looks l...

Dear testers, 3.7.0-rc1 was just tagged; please start your testing engines :-) Upload binaries to the sftp and report your results to this thread. I'm sorry for the delay between branching and tagging. The changes to the release script took a little longer than I hoped. Thanks for helping with the release, and do let me know of any issues, questions, etc. The tracking bug for release

On 6 July 2015 at 10:34, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 July 2015 at 01:12, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: >> >> >> @Ben Pope: Your uploaded binary tarball is the odd one out. Any idea >> as to why the CMake files are missing and why the root directory name >> inside the tarba...

I’m sorry for the late announcement. The binaries for the 3.5 release candidate 2 are now available. Please pick them up here and test them out! http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.5/ -bw -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140811/c65347b7/attachment.html>

...LeakSanitizer-Standalone :: TestCases/cleanup_in_tsd_destructor.cc LeakSanitizer-Standalone :: TestCases/disabler.cc LeakSanitizer-Standalone :: TestCases/disabler_in_tsd_destructor.cc LeakSanitizer-Standalone :: TestCases/ignore_object.cc On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, July 31, 2015 07:50 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > >> Dear testers, >> >> 3.7.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test, build binaries, upload to the >> sftp, and report results to this thread. >> > LNT is looking good on Ubuntu 14....

On Friday, July 31, 2015 07:50 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > Dear testers, > > 3.7.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test, build binaries, upload to the > sftp, and report results to this thread. LNT is looking good on Ubuntu 14.04 x64, uploaded: clang+llvm-3.7.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz The errors reported during build are: Failing Tests (17):

On 15/10/13 22:22, C K Kashyap wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am > running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both > cases, it looks like the problem is due to headers from VC/g++. > I was wondering if someone can point me to some steps on setting up a > Windows or Linux(ubuntu 12.04 LTS) box for

Hi, I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both cases, it looks like the problem is due to headers from VC/g++. I was wondering if someone can point me to some steps on setting up a Windows or Linux(ubuntu 12.04 LTS) box for exploring clang. I was able to successfully build clang on my ubuntu but

Reminder: The plan is to create the 3.6 branch next week, on 14 January. Please help get the release notes and other documents updated. For example, both the LLVM [1] and Clang [2] release notes look pretty empty. Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me know. Cheers, Hans 1. http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html 2.

The raspberry Pi2 is an armv7a chip (Cortex-A7), the first stage builds fine with the native g++ (if not a little slowly at 10+ hours), but it crashes at some point with this command line: Program arguments: /home/ben/development/llvm/3.6.0/rc2/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-3.6.0-rc2.install/bin/clang -cc1 -triple armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf -emit-obj -disable-free -disable-llvm-verifier

Hi, I've just tagged 3.5.1-rc2, so testing can begin. Remember to use the 3.5 branch of the test-suite. If you have any questions, let me know. -Tom

Hello testers, Start your engines, RC3 has just been tagged (at r229050 on the branch). If this one looks good, it will become the release. There has been quite a bit of activity on the branch since RC2; let's hope it's all goodness :-) Please let me know how it looks, and upload binaries to the sftp as usual. Thanks for all your efforts so far! - Hans

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:51:32PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 06:04:35PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just a reminder that testing for 3.5.2 will begin on Monday, Mar 16. If > > you have any patches you want merged please send an email to the > > relevant commits list and cc me and the code owner. If you have already >