search for: bemoan

On 03/08/2016 06:49 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2016-03-07, ken <gebser at mousecar.com> wrote: >> Weird. There seems to be quite a bit of software missing from C7.2, >> gnome-applets being one of them. Or has it been moved or renamed or >> otherwise obscured? >> >> tia > > Since gnome-panel and 'flashback' mode have been removed from

Is the following a bug with stem() or is there something else that I am missing? I ran stem() on the vector x below and got stem(x-10) instead of stem(x). If I subtract 1 from x, I get a correct answer. If I add 1 to x, I still get a wrong answer. If I add 10 to x, I get a correct answer. I'm not sure what to make of this, other than to think it is a bug. Can anyone tell me if this is a bug?

...oft (SIP) clients on the same internal network, the caveat that it would break internal SIP clients was, for me, a reason to not yet implement his fix. I was examining chan_sip.c, trying to think of a way to implement his 'Naturally it would be much better to make this behavior:', and while bemoaning my pathetic C skills, thought of another solution: -CUT HERE TO GET RIGHT TO THE POINT :P- 1) Somehow (I use dynamic DNS) get a FQDN to point to the IP of the outside of your NAT box; 2) Implement W Snel's hardcoding as in the above URL, using your chosen FQDN where, in his example, he has...

I've created a set of java bindings for the newest libshout 2.0 release. They work well and enable the streaming of mp3 and ogg/vorbis to icecast2 servers from java. Binding with java allows for complex java logic while using the fast, maintained and solid native backend. They can be fetched from CVS via: cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@benow.ca:/cvs/benow login <passwd:

Try this: 0.7-0.3==0.4 (We get FALSE) 0.7-0.3<0.4 (We get TRUE) but 0.8-0.3==0.5 (TRUE) 0.8-0.3<0.5 (FALSE) Funny, he? There is a way around: round(0.7-0.3,1)==0.4 (TRUE) Obviously there is a problem with some combinations of decimal subtractions, that - we have the feeling - shouldt be solved. Best regards Sven & Wolfgang -- View this message in context:

Try this: 0.7-0.3==0.4 (We get FALSE) 0.7-0.3<0.4 (We get TRUE) but 0.8-0.3==0.5 (TRUE) 0.8-0.3<0.5 (FALSE) Funny, he? There is a way around: round(0.7-0.3,1)==0.4 (TRUE) Obviously there is a problem with some combinations of decimal subtractions, that - we have the feeling - shouldt be solved. Best regards Sven & Wolfgang -- View this message in context:

...bably some other things I'm not remembering. > > I'm still not finding any of that in C7.2... it's like this "upgrade" is > several steps backwards from the functionality in earlier CentOS > version. Or am I missing something? No, many before you have similarly bemoaned the changes made during the transition from GNOME 2 to 3. I suggest you take a look around the extensions website[1] for extensions which restore the missing functionality. Use gnome-tweak-tool to install and remove extensions. They can be a bit hit-and-miss when it comes to compatibility with th...

Hi, I am currently working on a managesieve daemon, so that I can use the squirrelmail plugin avelsieve together with dovecot-lda. Without this I can't migrate from cyrus to dovecot. For several reasons I don't use the timsieved from cyrus and build it from scratch. Is this interesting for somebody else? Gerald

People's valiant efforts to sort out CODA aside, the burning question remains: has anybody made any headway with restart()? or any other way (and there may well be better) of trapping `fatal' errors from calls within a function. Simon Fear =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= r-help mailing list -- Read

Hello everybody, On the documentation page for the tailcallelim pass you can read: "This pass transforms functions that are prevented from being tail recursive by an associative expression to use an accumulator variable, thus compiling the typical naive factorial or fib implementation into efficient code” However, I don’t see this behavior when trying to compile this variant of the

Hi all, These are the patches I'm planning to submit for 2.6.24. Comments gratefully accepted. Along with the usual cleanups and improvements are Jes' de-i386-ification patches, and a new "virtio" mechanism designed to be shared with KVM (and hopefully other hypervisors). Cheers, Rusty. Documentation/lguest/Makefile | 30 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c

Hi all, These are the patches I'm planning to submit for 2.6.24. Comments gratefully accepted. Along with the usual cleanups and improvements are Jes' de-i386-ification patches, and a new "virtio" mechanism designed to be shared with KVM (and hopefully other hypervisors). Cheers, Rusty. Documentation/lguest/Makefile | 30 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c