search for: behemoths

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 08:47:58PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > kinda random thought but since we're touching this area - could we > perhaps move the definition of struct bio_vec and trivial helpers > like this into a new header? bvec.h pulls in mm.h which is a right > behemoth :S I bet we can drop mm.h now. It was originally added for nth_page() in 3d75ca0adef4 but those were

After reading the digital shortcut and the documentation on the web site I''m confused. Which one should I use? pen, balance or nginx ? I don''t want to use a behemoth like appache and ssl is not needed so it reduces my choice to those three only.... What are the pros and cons of each? I don''t have much money, so the less ressources I use the better it is for me.... As

...nt this point, here is the paper that explain how RSA-768 was factorized. In 2010, the authors estimated that it would take around 1500 years to a single-core machine of this generation to ?do the same thing. We're 7 years after their first results, and we now have access to massive cloud-based behemoths for a discount. How much time would it resist? The idea of removing weak ciphers from a widely used piece of software is a good one - that way, you strengthen the whole ecosystem. Going the reverse path would simply make less informed people be the weak link of the Internet, putting possibly many...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 17/11/15 17:29, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 17.11.2015 17:51, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Nick Bright wrote: >>> On 11/17/2015 8:18 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >>>> This behaviour is congruent with SELinux. One utility adjusts >>>> the permanent configuration, the one that will be applied at

I propose the following humbly, with little know how as to how to implement, and realize it may have been proposed many times. It is just something I had on my mind. Would it be possible/desirable to have the whole CRAN package repository accessible through a public wiki, forge or version control interface (ideally a fusion of the wiki and forge approach)? It appears it would be a first for a

Following up to some extent on Friday's discussion regarding the 'validation' of R, could I ask the list group's opinion on possible advantages of R over Splus from a pharma/devices perspective? I wish to exclude the obvious price difference, which doesn’t seem to carry as much weight as I would have thought. Besides, I have noticed many former Splus users gravitating towards R,

Hi , I have a problem with NT 4.0 workstation with service pack 3 cant able to login to hp system. From FAQ what i understood is to modify the registry but even after modifying i couldn't able to login from NT 4.0 workstation. Can anybody can able to help me in this matter. Thx Ramesh -- ___________________________ Ramesh Ragineni Ilog (s) Pte Ltd Systems Engineer

I was able to get the loop to increment from -999 to 0 using IR directly. That got rid of the cmpq. The carry i was after was able to be obtained using the intrinsic @llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i64, however there is no way to add with carry and have it realise that the resulting *carry out* cannot exceed 1. It actually writes the carry to a byte, and then uses logical operations on it, which slows

On 12 June 2010 00:51, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote: >> Hi Eli, >> >> On 11 June 2010 22:44, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote:

...rvices on Rails <http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/websor/> By Kevin Marshall ISBN: 0-596-52796-9 32 pages, 9.99 USD, 12.99 CAD, 6.95 GBP This PDF will show you how your small business or enterprise can publish its APIs (application programming interface) to a developer community just like the behemoths of the Internet--Google, Yahoo!, eBay, and Amazon--allowing for add-on services and mash-ups to develop from them. Ruby on Rails levels the playing field for companies by simplifying the process of building web services and documenting APIs. With Rails, enterprise-quality tools are available for...

On Monday 09 June 2008, Albert Graef wrote: > Unfortunately, that approach doesn't work on x86-64 with LLVM 2.2, > since some parts of the LLVM JIT apparently contain non-relocatable > code; I hope that this will be fixed in the forthcoming LLVM 2.3. Unfortunately it's not fixed in 2.3 :( I made a patch ([1]) for 2.2 and gave it to one of the developer, I guess he forgot about

Cyrille Berger wrote: > Unfortunately it's not fixed in 2.3 :( That's indeed unfortunate. On x86-64 the Pure interpreter currently is a 7MB behemoth, and most of that is LLVM. ;-) On 32 bit I have all that stuff in a separate runtime library, resulting in a 27K interpreter executable. It goes without saying that this makes a world of a difference. I don't care if LLVM is a shared

First off, let me start by saying great job to the Wine devs and everyone who makes this project what it is. You guys continue to blow me away with some of this stuff. That said, I'm having a bit of trouble with Wine (1.3.29) and was hoping maybe someone more knowledgeable than I could help. I'm working on trying to get a piece of in-house software (read: not in AppDB, never will be) that

Hi Bill- I think, ideally, the backend would be able to match arbitrary-precision arithmetic to add-with-carry or subtract-with-borrow through i65/i33. That would remove the need for the overflow intrinsics entirely. Alistair On 13 Jun 2010, at 02:27, Bill Hart wrote: > I was able to get the loop to increment from -999 to 0 using IR > directly. That got rid of the cmpq. > > The

Hi, I've been trying here to install Rmpi on an SGI IA-64 machine with 64 processors, running SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9, R 2.4.0 and lam-mpi 7.1.3. While I've read of similar problems on this list, I think I've got an entirely new set of error messages to contribute (see below). I'm not sure what the actual error is and what the @gprel relocation message is about. Any help

Frankly I''m losing tolerance for the MS "stack." And I''m intrigued by Rails. But in my outfit I''m not only the web person, but also the application person and the DBA. So when I read that Rails doesn''t want to handle things like "compound keys" I blew right by those claims, thinking, "no way." But before I go deeper, I

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > > On 11 June 2010 22:44, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> a) What plans are there to support addition, subtraction, >>> multiplication, division,

I reallize I am responding to this thread a bit late, but here goes. On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 10:34, Reid Spencer wrote: > Snip snip snip, cut cut cut > As for other libraries, there is boost (which we've already excised), > and ACE (which is huge and heavy weight). APR is the rising star in this > area. As someone who has had to work on and with software written against ACE (the

Eli Friedman wrote: > This isn't first-hand, but from what I remember hearing on IRC, > putting llvm into shared libraries caused a ridiculous explosion in > dynamic linking (and therefore startup) times. So there is no option > to make shared libraries, at least at the moment. Well, by tweaking configure and make options, I've managed to build LLVM 2.2 shared libraries on

Why is www.secnet.com down ? i'm looking for the samba-audit-tool and didn't find any mirror. Thomas On Fri, 30 Apr 1999 samba@samba.org wrote: > SAMBA Digest 2073 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Group-Shares > by Johannes Scherbaum <scherj@funkhaus.de> >