search for: beefy

I''ve been messing around with Puppet on a VM on my personal desktop. It looks descent. I was wondering what kind of load this thing would have managing about 400 nodes. Does this thing require a beefy server? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit...

...r my configuration will work: - 3x Fritz!Card PCI's in one host. - 3x 6 b-channels. - ~20 Budgetone (and some others) handsets. Can anyone answer these questions: - Will the 3 ISDN cards function correctly in one host? - Will running all 3 cards flat out require particularly beefy hardware? - Will the Grandstream phones provide a good equivilant to professional dedicated PBX phones? (assuming a good network) I have read lots about echo problems and so on, is this an issue? Any help in the matter would be very much appreciated. Thanks in advance! David...

...to put it on, and I've found someone with a P-II 350 with 64MB of RAM (I could steal another 64MB from the firewall if I have to). So, I need an opinion from some more experienced users. Given the same number of ports and assuming I don't run any other apps on the box, is that P-II 350 beefy enough to handle my * setup comfortably? Thanks, Jeff

I have a beefy machine (Intel dual-quad core, 16GB memory 2 x GigE) I have loaded RHEL5.1-xen on the hardware and have created two logical systems: 4 cpus, 7.5 GB memory 1 x Gige Following RHEL guidelines, I have it set up so that eth0->xenbr0 and eth1->xenbr1 Each of the two RHEL5.1 guests uses one of th...

My first ARM testing results or lack of them indicate that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be o...

Jamie J. Begin wrote: > > I have the crazy idea to run both Microsoft Terminal Server > and Small Business Server (SBS is a license-restricted > version of Windows Server with Exchange for shop with <50 > users) in separate HVM domUs. Assuming that I have a beefy > enough underlying hardware, how likely do you think this > would work? I know that Exchange isn''t one of those apps > that are ideally suited for virtualization, but this would > only be handling email for about 15 users. For 15 users you can get away with just about an...

...CentOS 6.9 dvd1 with just @base and @core package groups. When I went to install mysql it failed due to incompatibilities with the libcc versions. Updated just glibc and glibc-common and then installed mysql. Shortly there after it started to freeze and lost connection. The KVM host is fairly beefy and mysql wasn't doing anything but running with no queries or data. I rebooted the guest and it still had lock up issues. When I rebuilt the guest and did a full yum update, to include kernel and kernel-headers, it seemed to run fine. It seems like there's a dependency between glibc(-...

...ctor with non-duplicate names in which the values are the means of the values of the duplicated indexes in x. My best (fastest) solution to this was this code: nms <- names( x ) x.uniq <- sapply( unique( nms ), function( i ) mean( subtracted[ nms == i ] ) ) However, this takes forever on my beefy Mac Pro. Is there a faster way to this using pre-written functions in R? Thanks a lot for any advice. -David

...inside office on the 42nd floor and it's really hard to get good reception. So, I'm thinking about running a softphone on my Mac laptop and using it. The big problem is that my office is *noisy*--I'm currently sharing it with a pile of Cisco routers and a number of 1U servers with beefy fans. So, I need a good USB headset that can cope with noisy conditions. Oh, yeah, and it'd be nice if it was cheap. Does anyone have any suggestions? Would I be better off spending the $65 for a cheezy budgetone then $20 on a headset, and $20 on software, and $25 on a better headset, a...

...OS 6.4 running on it quite happily so the hardware's up to it. I chose to install the 'Server GUI' packages because I was curious. Maybe herein lies my problem? Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.9 & 6.4, Debian Squeeze & Wheezy, Fedora Beefy, Spherical & That Damn Cat, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard & Ubuntu Precise, Quantal & Raring GnuPG Key : http://www.horse-latitudes.co.uk/publickey.asc

Hi, Can someone tell us what is the usual number of guests on a typical host in a production environment ? Has someone tested this ? What number does it scale to ? We have around 150 per host running fine. Regards, Navin

On 10/17/2011 09:20 AM, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > > My first ARM testing results or lack of them indicate > that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. > It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. > My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started > eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. > > So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix > and even inexpensi...

I have some beefy dual-Xeon servers that I will be using for Asterisk VoIP applications (i.e. no Zaptel cards). Using 2.6.11-1.14_FC3smp as the kernel (Fedora Core 3), and currently with Asterisk STABLE. My question is concerning the CPU setup, as I've seen conflicting or out-of-date suggestions: given the abov...

...od-looking cases are no problem at all, and if low price wasn't the goal, touchscreens and all would be an option too - maybe some "deluxe" edition? An alternative design that came up was a bigger (say, 12/24 ports) gateway with some embedded Linux running on an industrial PC (as beefy as circumstances require - any comments?) with plain RJ11 sockets on one side and Ethernet on the other. What do you think about this? Hope to hear from you (a lot! :) Grzegorz Nosek

...ap and another 700 pop session at any given time. reporting that imap is slow or that squirrelmail is slow? ;) How is the load average on the server? We found at our site to keep Apache/squirrelmail happy, we dedicated a server for our webmail users. Mostly being a RAM issue in that case. Just how beefy is the server you are using? > I am having a time issue on this server and im not sure if its affecting > dovecot. > > May 29 11:42:19 pop dovecot: POP3(xxx): Time just moved backwards by 1 > seconds. I'll sleep now until w > e're back in present. > May 29 11:42:19 po...

I was just about to replace 2 Merlin Legend systems (one in my house and one in my Parent's house) with * systems. I have 2 beefy linux systems ready to go and have enough Cisco 7960 and 7970 phones to replace all my MLX-10D, MLX-16D and MLX-20 phones. Then I discovered that * seems to be lacking a critical feature for replacing a legend (or any standard PBX) and that is an ability for a user to see if another user is on...

So I''m still working on a ''perfect'' setup so I can document it on the wiki, and will submit some puppet patches against 0.23.2 next week, but here''s what I''ve done that has made a big difference to stability here. in puppetmasterd at line 261, I''ve modified the Mongrel instantiation from: server = Mongrel::HttpServer.new(addr,

...for a firewall? What I mean is: 1. motherboard/CPU - p4? Dual-Core? Intel i3, i5, i7? 2. RAM? 4gb? 8gb? More? 32gb? 3. Obviously GB Nics! I am bring about 300gb of traffic a month right now and I expect that to increase significantly with my next offerings. Obviously one answer is to but a beefy motherboard that supports lots of RAM and add more as needed, but where does one start out? How do I know if my firewall would need more RAM? How do I know if the CPU is good enough? I still go back to my Cisco PIX days where these devices were amazing on just 256MB of RAM. We piloted a large c...

Hi all I have a Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) with libvirt versions: libvirt-0.9.11.3-1.fc17.x86_64 virt-manager-0.9.1-3.fc17.noarch I have allowed non-root user to user libvirt by allowing the user through polkit cat /etc/polkit-1/localauthority/50-local.d/cat 50-org.example-libvirt-remote-access.pkla [Remote libvirt SSH access]...

...ng mail off list: "Why are you still here? And by here I mean the Xiph lists. I've seen you speaking ill of our formats and of free software more than in one occasion. So, for what purpose do you still stick around? What is your intention?" Am I really coming through like such a beefy grouser? I hope people knowing me a little bit better realize that I've spent quite some time on Xiph related work, which however does not keep me from being realistic and rather sceptic towards many of the approaches I've seen to support Xiph. It might just be me, but I don't think...