Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "bcond_with".
2020 Jun 26
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.48.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote:
> There are a few of those, but not many.
Hi Tom,
I noticed that for example in R-assertthat you have used the bcond:
%bcond_with check
would not it be better to use bootstrap instead to take advantage of:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping
I am asking for curiosity since from now on we will need to do this dance once
a year for the releases that we deem worth (I would expect that to...
2020 Jun 26
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Friday, 26 June 2020 10.47.13 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote:
> I used bcond locally and wrongly assumed that fedpkg build would
> support --with BCOND and --without BCOND. Instead, the way to activate
> it is to change to "%bcond_with check" and then revert to
> "%bcond_without check". The only difference with bootstrap is that
> "bootstrap" is recognized and a suffix ~bootstrap can be added
> automatically to the resulting build. So the question is whether we
> want that suffix or not.
AFAI...
2020 Jun 26
0
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
...Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:
>
> On Friday, 26 June 2020 10.47.13 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote:
> > I used bcond locally and wrongly assumed that fedpkg build would
> > support --with BCOND and --without BCOND. Instead, the way to activate
> > it is to change to "%bcond_with check" and then revert to
> > "%bcond_without check". The only difference with bootstrap is that
> > "bootstrap" is recognized and a suffix ~bootstrap can be added
> > automatically to the resulting build. So the question is whether we
> > want that...
2020 Jun 26
0
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
..., 26 Jun 2020 at 11:36, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.48.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote:
> > There are a few of those, but not many.
>
> Hi Tom,
> I noticed that for example in R-assertthat you have used the bcond:
>
> %bcond_with check
>
> would not it be better to use bootstrap instead to take advantage of:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping
>
> I am asking for curiosity since from now on we will need to do this dance once
> a year for the releases that we deem wort...
2007 Dec 11
1
1.0.8 with quota 1.0.8 patch - undefined symbol: quota_set
...f
and
%patch103 -p1 -b .mkcert-permissions
%patch105 -p1 -b .mkcert-paths
%patch106 -p1 -b .quota
Since I'm using centos to match RHEL 4
[rpmbuild at test SPECS]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 (Nahant)
I also added to my .rpmmacros for the rpmbuild user I have
%bcond_with() %{expand:%%{?_with_%{1}:%%global with_%{1} 1}}
%bcond_without() %{expand:%%{!?_without_%{1}:%%global without_%{1} 1}}
%with() %{expand:%%{?with_%{1}:1}%%{!?with_%{1}:0}}
%without() %{expand:%%{?without_%{1}:0}%%{!?without_%{1}:1}}
then
rpm -e dovecot
su rpmbuild
......
2020 Jun 23
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.10.07 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote:
> 3) For all packages, either merge master into F32 or just increase the
> release version and send builds to that side tag *in order*.
The part that worries me is the *in order*. :-)
Do we need to do bootstrap builds that are later replaced by the real
builds?
Because other than that it is business as usual. :-)
--
Jos? Ab?lio
2020 Jun 26
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
Hi Jos?,
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 20:05, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:
>
> On Friday, 26 June 2020 00.45.46 WEST Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > Thanks for starting off builds. However, please be careful merging to
> > master, as some packages were bumped and have incompatibilities that
> > should not be put in stable releases. I will try to come