search for: bbss

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bbss".

Did you mean: bss
2019 Nov 20
3
[cfe-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
...better tool, not a different tool. We want to bring in new > people without alienating old people, like me. > > Discourse seems to be OSS GPLv2, so we could host our own and apply > our own CoC / moderating if providers are not able to meet our needs. > I have real trouble using web BBSs (text ones over dialup were fine), > so I'd really appreciate an email/subscription mechanism. > > If we do select a provider (for Discourse, another or even Stack > Overflow), we need to make sure we'll always be able to download the > whole history and move to another servi...
2019 Nov 20
4
[cfe-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
There *are* open-source Discord clients, 3rd party tools and the like. The corporation behind Discord is just not authorising you legally to use any of those tools at hand. There are rarely any technical barriers or countermeasures, though. Roman Lebedev via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. nov. 18., H, 16:08): > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:10 PM Nico Weber via
2013 May 13
8
[Bug 2101] New: Unaligned memory access on sparc in UMAC implemetation
...d. And indeed, when compiled using Solaris Studio 12.1 cc, the variable address (0x909ac) is only word-aligned: 58588: 37 00 02 42 sethi %hi(0x90800), %i3 5858c: 40 00 18 1a call 5e5f4 <umac_final> 58590: 92 06 e1 ac add %i3, 0x1ac, %o1 ! 909ac <Bbss.bss> This later causes a crash in: pdf_gen_xor+0x68: ldx [0x909ac], %o5 I am proposing two alternatives for the fix (please, see attached): umac_align-pragma.patch - Solaris Studio specific pragma umac_align-union.patch - generic approach - union for alignment -- You are receiving this mail...