Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "bb14".
Did you mean:
bb1
2013 Apr 12
7
Xen not seeing all the memory in the box
I''m running Xen 4.1 (4.1.3-3ubuntu1.3) on an Ubuntu 12.10 server with
an AMD FX-8150 processor (8 cores) and 16 GB of RAM.
When I boot the server, Xen sees only 3 GB of RAM (instead of 16 GB).
If I try to create a domU with more than about 1.5 GB of RAM, the create
fails with messages saying it "could not allocate memory for HVM guest".
Here''s the output when I do
2013 Nov 15
2
[LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
...ble for multiple free's to be inserted on the path from malloc to an
exit. For example, in the following CFG:
BB10 (malloc)
/ \
BB11 BB12
... / \ / \ ...
\ / \ / \ /
BB13 BB14 BB15
| ...
| /
BB16
The block BB10 dominates BB11, BB12 and BB14. The dominance frontier of
BB10 contains BB13, BB15 and BB16. So if the predecessors of the dominance
frontier contains BB11, BB12 and BB14. If a call to f...
2013 Nov 15
0
[LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
Try breaking the critical edges (-break-crit-edges).
This way, a new block will be created between BB13 and BB11 (call this
BB11.break) and BB15 and BB12 (call this BB12.break).
The predecessors of the dominance frontier will, thus, be BB11.break,
BB12.break, and BB14.
When we enter through a block with a call to malloc(), we will end up in
one of the blocks in the dominance frontier (kind of). These blocks must
have multiple predecessors, else it would not be in the dominance frontier.
If a predecessors of these blocks has only one successor, then that
success...
2013 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
>
> It seems that placing the calls to free at the predecessors of dominance
> frontier is inadequate. It is possible that there are exit blocks that are
> dominated by BB12 (calls to malloc). I guess we can also insert calls to
> free at these exit blocks too.
That crossed my mind a few minutes later. : )
If you're interested, PRE.cpp existed last at r25315. It calculates the
2013 Nov 13
3
[LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
Hi Henrique,
Thanks for the quick reply!
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Henrique Santos <
henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote:
> PRE normally uses a latest placement algorithm to do something of the sort.
> I don't know about GVN/PRE, but older version of PRE might have it.
> Just placing the calls to free at the predecessors (dominated by BB12) of
> the dominance
2007 Jul 12
1
[LLVMdev] backend problem with LiveInterval::removeRange
...0x88c8af0: ch = store 0x88ca1e8, 0x88c8f30, 0x88c90f8, 0x88c9060
0x88ca240: i32 = Constant <2>
0x88ca2a8: i32 = FrameIndex <6>
0x88c9060: <multiple use>
0x88c9298: ch = store 0x88c8af0, 0x88ca240, 0x88ca2a8, 0x88c9060
0x88c9330: ch = BasicBlock <bb14 0x88c8020>
0x88c8c88: ch = br 0x88c9298, 0x88c9330
Legalized selection DAG:
SelectionDAG has 10 nodes:
0x88c9060: i32 = undef
0x88ca1e8: ch = EntryToken
0x88c8f30: i32 = Constant <0>
0x88c90f8: i32 = FrameIndex <8>
0x88c9060: <multiple use>...
2007 May 04
1
mscomctl.ocx
Greetings Flac-landers,
I have a brand new puter with xp pro 2002 sp2.
I downloaded flac-1.1.4b and installed, but when I ran the installed software, it told me that it was unable to run as I do not have mscomctl.ocx on my system. I searched my puter and indeed it is not on it anywhere.
I looked all over the site for the prerequisites needed to install, but did not find them.
Can someone
2017 Jan 13
4
Wrong code bug after GVN/PRE?
...%ptr7 %step1.7
%_tmp72 = add %int4 %_tmp71, 1
store %int4 %_tmp72, %ptr7 %step1.7
%_tmp73 = load %int4, %ptr7 %step1.7
%_tmp74 = icmp slt %int4 %_tmp73, 3
br i1 %_tmp74, label %bb1, label %bb13
bb13:
store %int4 10, %ptr7 %j.9
store %ptr20 %ub.16, %ptr26 %liv3.14
store %int4 0, %ptr7 %i.8
br label %bb14
bb14:
%_tmp75 = load %ptr20, %ptr26 %liv3.14
%_tmp76 = load %int4, %ptr7 %i.8
%_tmp77 = sext %int4 %_tmp76 to i64
%_tmp78 = getelementptr %arr18, %ptr20 %_tmp75, i16 0, i64 %_tmp77
%_tmp79 = load %int4, %ptr7 %_tmp78
store %int4 %_tmp79, %ptr7 %globcse1.10
%_tmp84 = load %int4, %ptr7 %globcse1.10
%...
2010 Jun 17
0
[LLVMdev] Loopinfo Analysis
Hi Hisham,
Most likely the basic blocks are the headers of two different loops. Try running viewCFG() on the function in question to see if this is the case.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hisham Chowdhury" <hisham_chow at yahoo.com>
To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 7:22:00 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [LLVMdev] Loopinfo Analysis
2020 May 13
0
Running libvirtd inside chroot (mock to be precise)
...lago-basic-/master-key.aes
-machine
pc-i440fx-rhel7.6.0,accel=kvm,usb=off,vmport=off,dump-guest-core=off
-cpu host -m 4096 -realtime mlock=off -smp 2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1
-object iothread,id=iothread1 -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0,mem=2048 -numa
node,nodeid=1,cpus=1,mem=2048 -uuid 10ed4b42-bb14-4b03-a411-c62fb1181c2d
-display none -no-user-config -nodefaults -chardev
socket,id=charmonitor,fd=31,server,nowait -mon
chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=control -rtc base=utc -no-shutdown
-global PIIX4_PM.disable_s3=1 -global PIIX4_PM.disable_s4=1 -boot
menu=off,strict=on -device
virtio-s...
2010 Jun 16
2
[LLVMdev] Loopinfo Analysis
Hello,
I have a question regrading the analysis pass that generates loop info from an .ll code. My previous understanding was there will be just one loop header(in the loop info) for a particular loop. But, when i use isLoopHeader() member function from the loop info class I get 'true' return value for two different basic blocks. Note both basic blocks are loop conditional block(break