search for: bawu

Hi all... How do i set U32 to filter a port range, instead of a single port? In normal use: source port 80 we use: "... match ip sport 80 0xffff ..." - I know that is something about the 0xffff parameter.... I need to filter ports 1 ~ 1024 to a higher priority class... i tried with IPTABLES MARK and TC FW, but it''s not working.... (...) # iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p

...+0200 1536525811.026071 1536525811.026071 ) A duplicate Date header is certainly unexpected. Having a look at the original mail on disk on the Cyrus server shows the following Mail: >From [redacted] Tue Jul 9 19:26:04 2002 X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 1.3 Return-Path: [redacted] Received: from bender.bawue.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bender.bawue.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79CE48CBC; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:29:08 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [redacted] Received: from [redacted] by bender.bawue.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA4848CAA for [redacted]; Tue, 9 Jul 2002...

Hi, I am attempting to migrate a mailspool from a cyrus server to a dovecot server using the dsync backup approach as described in the wiki at <https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/Dsync>. The first attempt works great. Everything copies over and a quick glance over the spool looks good. Running doveadm backup again though results in the following error: dsync(eggs): Warning: Deleting

Hello ! I use Slackware Linux on a box for routing and SNAT for a small network: |eth0: 80.97.108.1| | | |eth1: 192.168.1.1| ..........| my network (192.168.1.0/24)| I search for a tool show-me on real time the trafic made by all/one IPon the interface eth1, somethings simple ; EX: 192.168.1.10 ........... x kbit/s 192.168.1.11 ........... y kbit/s 192.168.1.12

...+0200 1536525811.026071 1536525811.026071 ) A duplicate Date header is certainly unexpected. Having a look at the original mail on disk on the Cyrus server shows the following Mail: >From [redacted] Tue Jul 9 19:26:04 2002 X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 1.3 Return-Path: [redacted] Received: from bender.bawue.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bender.bawue.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79CE48CBC; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:29:08 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [redacted] Received: from [redacted] by bender.bawue.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA4848CAA for [redacted]; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:...

Dear Andreas, some googling revealed, you created a driver for the xanto series of online-usv.de. In what state it is currently? I've to manage a S2000 and would like to use nut for it, is it usable by now? Do you need another tester? TIA, Pete

...secs, 60.034 in http ioloop, 0.000 in other ioloops, connected 1739.235 secs ago) dovecot: indexer-worker(eggs at localhost): Error: Mailbox INBOX.junk: Mail search failed: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2017-10-09 03:46:09] dovecot: indexer-worker(eggs at bawue.de): Error: Mailbox INBOX.junk: Transaction commit failed: FTS transaction commit failed: transaction context (attempted to index 12084 messages (UIDs 2..17850)) Is that actually sensible behavior? I would consider attachment metadata to be nice to have, but not necessarily mandatory. So if t...

> On 9 Sep 2018, at 18.42, Andreas Thienemann <andreas at bawue.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am attempting to migrate a mailspool from a cyrus server to a dovecot server using the dsync backup approach as described in the wiki at <https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/Dsync>. > > The first attempt works great. Everything copies over and...

...nvalid Mar 19 07:24:58 services kernel: smb_retry: new pid=1059, generation=8 Mar 19 07:30:01 services kernel: smb_retry: signal failed, error=-3 Mar 19 07:30:01 services kernel: smb_lookup: find //MCCWIN failed, error=-5 any hint is welcome. thanks Edmund -- Edmund Mergl mailto:E.Mergl@bawue.de http://www.edmund-mergl.de

...y on large uploads - almost done but not quite. (Stef Coene) > 5. Re: herz the script that i have done. (Stef Coene) > 6. Re: htb problem (Stef Coene) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org> > Organization: None > To: arny@ats.s.bawue.de, lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] Low latency on large uploads - almost done but not quite. > Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 11:09:09 +0200 > > > Here''s still my script, if you are interested to look at it. > I''m interested and I have some remarks. > &...

please keep the list cc'ed when replying me. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andreas Thienemann <andreas@bawue.net> Date: 15 nov. 2005 15:36 Subject: Re: RE New xanto driver for NUT To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev@gmail.com> Hello Arnaud, On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Arnaud Quette wrote: > is there really a need to separate it from the megatec. > we're currently trying to merge similar drivers...

please keep the list cc'ed when replying me. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andreas Thienemann <andreas@bawue.net> Date: 15 nov. 2005 15:36 Subject: Re: RE New xanto driver for NUT To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev@gmail.com> Hello Arnaud, On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Arnaud Quette wrote: > is there really a need to separate it from the megatec. > we're currently trying to merge similar drivers...

...CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: [LARTC] Low latency on large uploads - almost done but not quite. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, The wondershaper did not work quite the way I wanted it to work, with the CBQ-wondershaper even g...

hello everyone, thanks to todd 1.2.21 is out :) every release getting better, i would like to get consensus on these "important" bugs: #252078 logtail: should depend on perl >= 5.8 sarge as any other modern linux distro use perl 5.8.x, it's even inside of its base. backports are under the peril of its author if no one voices up, i'll close that bug in the next days.

I am wondering if it's possible to have a tcp listener for LMTP do authentication and not accept any unauthenticated mail. My configuration looks like the following: service lmtp { inet_listener lmtp { address = 192.168.0.1 127.0.0.1 port = 24 } } This gives me a network reachable lmtp socket, but of course no autentication. When reading the docs, it seems though that only

Hi Stephan, On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Stephan Bosch wrote: > LMTP currently does not support AUTH. Bummer. Thought so. > What is your use case? Most people hide LMTP behind a firewall, or don't > expose it through TCP/IP in the first place. The port is currently only available to a few trusted machines, but having auth available would have been a nice benefit in case the firewall

Hello, I have a machine with several ips. My goal is to only allow access to one ip for a certain user. for example 192.168.1.11 may only be used by UID 1001 I have found in the man page for bind following errno numeric: > EACCES The address is protected, and the user is not the super-user. Is it possible to restrict access to certain ips to certain uids? - Thilo Schulz

Hello, I'm getting compile errors on AIX 5.1, not defining WITH_AIXAUTHENTICATE in config.h seems to solve the problem. I have configured with --syscondir=/etc/ssh and --with-ssl-dir=/usr/local/ssl and I am using gcc 2.95.3 The error messages is included below. Regards, Florian ---- make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dmc/src/openssh-3.7.1p1/openbsd-compat' gcc -g -O2 -Wall

Hi, I am in the middle of setting up a dovecot imap server to replace an aging cyrus imapd. The new server is using mdbox storage for better filesystem performance and is running dovecot-2.2.32. To migrate email over and keep UIDs etc. intact I used the backup feature of doveadm. During testing this generally worked fine. So thanks for that functionality, it really makes migration much

Hi, I have a dovecot 2.3.2.1 instance running here that is getting userdb and passdb data from a SQL database. This was a cyrus server migrated over and all users are happy. All users except one: Said user asked if it would be possible to disable subaddressing (localuser+folder at example.com) again. The setting controlling that is AFAIK the lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox item. My idea was to