search for: baskins

Hi Rowland, Currently Domain Users doesn't have a gidNumber because it didn't have a corresponding group in OpenLDAP, which is our master directory. The primary Unix group gidNumber for each user is replicated from their OpenLDAP records, but the AD groups have a suffix due to historical name collisions - a POSIX group called harry would be harry-group in AD, but with a matching

On 09/02/16 12:24 AM, g wrote: > > > On 02/08/16 23:10, Digimer wrote: >> On 09/02/16 12:08 AM, g wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 02/08/16 15:34, Wes James wrote: >>>> Is there a utility to zero unused blocks on a disk? >>>> >>>> CentOS 6.7/Ext4 >>>> >>>> I saw zerofree, but I?m not sure it would work on

On 2/9/2016 12:42 AM, g wrote: > On 02/08/16 23:39, Digimer wrote: > > > >I need ice cream to feel better.;) > > > . > Baskin-Robbins 32 flavors + special of month. After seeing Aaron Neville tonight (wow, what a show, 3rd row center seats in a small theater, we were 15' from the stage), we stopped at The Penny Ice Creamery, and I had a small cone of Meyers Lemon

Hello, We share out user home dirs from a a solaris server via samba. On a windows machine I can change file permissions to files in my samba home dir. From OS X 10.4.2 all the files are at 700 and chmod does nothing to them. From the GUI get info just says that I can read and write. The smb.conf on the sun server has the following entries under the [home] section: browseable = no read only =

On 06/07/2015 11:05 PM, g wrote: > > > On 06/07/2015 07:25 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > <<>> > >> So, I'm not sure how to interpret what you said. Can I get the same >> results from a CentOS install using some combination of options? > > because your are playing with multi flavors, > [i bet you like going to baskin-robbins for ice cream ;-) ]

I agree that this sounds like, and indeed is, a recipe for disaster. I was going to explain some of the woes of our environment but I don't think it's actually relevant after looking at my problem a bit more. If I'm way off base I'm happy to be herded back, but please tolerate me as I share what I am seeing today because I really hope to solve the narrow issue of SMB file access

Hi, What is the magic juju that I have to put in /etc/sysconfig/autofs to get autofs to default to using NFSv4, rather than NFSv3, for mounting file systems? I don't want to place these flags into the automount maps themselves because we have a varied network with Sun, CentOS, RedHat and Macintosh systems, and the flags that have to get added to automount maps (which we distribute centrally

Hi Rowland, Thanks for the prompt reply. The gidNumber attribute is set to the appropriate primary UNIX group for each user already. Are there any ways to work around the ID issue, or at least to mitigate some of the consequences? We looked at updating uid/gid values across the board but there is so much data owned by existing users and groups that we haven't been able to proceed. On

We have a particular file system that we're trying to keep in sync between two FreeBSD/ZFS servers using Rsync. The file system has many millions of files, and about 4TB of data total. Rsync takes HOURS to run, even when there are no files to transfer. Just the comparison itself takes hours. Is there any way to speed up the transfer? The command line I'm using is:

On 06/07/2015 04:52 PM, g wrote: > > > On 06/07/2015 05:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On 06/07/2015 03:25 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > <<<>>> > >>> Yes it does replace your home directory. When I do a fresh >>> install, I back up my home directory on a usb drive and then copy >>> it back after the install. I think you can also

Hi, All Thanks to Robert Baskin, Thomas Lumley, and Spencer Graves for the valuable helps. I have learned a lot from this discussion. I put all discussions together without editing, so we can see how things are evolved. Likely, I have a lot of articles to read. As in the discussion, mixed modeling approach is a poosible but may be over-kill in my posted data analyses. I will explore other

Ugh, I knew I forgot something. Here is smb.conf: --- [global] kerberos method = system keytab template homedir = /soe/%U workgroup = BSOE template shell = /bin/bash security = ads realm = AD.SOE.UCSC.EDU idmap config BSOE : schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config BSOE : range = 100-999999 idmap config BSOE : backend = ad idmap config BSOE : unix_nss_info = yes idmap config BSOE : unix_primary_group

On 06/07/2015 07:25 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: <<>> > So, I'm not sure how to interpret what you said. Can I get the same > results from a CentOS install using some combination of options? because your are playing with multi flavors, [i bet you like going to baskin-robbins for ice cream ;-) ] a solution for you would be what i did some years back and i was playing with diff

On 02/08/16 23:39, Digimer wrote: > On 09/02/16 12:24 AM, g wrote: <<>> >> fell better? :-P > > I need ice cream to feel better. ;) > . Baskin-Robbins 32 flavors + special of month. -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux

I should add that the samba.log file was logging NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS errors when authentication attempts were failing. Workstations in the domains were still able to authenticate, however, and I verified that the DNS records were still correct. The SRV records were all in place and the domain controllers' host names were resolving. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Eric Shell

On 09/07/2019 20:00, Eric Shell wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Currently Domain Users doesn't have a gidNumber because it didn't have > a corresponding group in OpenLDAP, which is our master directory. Did you miss the bit where I said Domain Users MUST have a gidNumber ? > > The primary Unix group gidNumber for each user is replicated from > their OpenLDAP records, but

Hi, I was wondering if there is any momentum to get OpenLDAP's back_perl feature installed into the CentOS Yum repository. If this isn't the right mailing list for such a request, could someone point me in the correct direction? Thanks! Tim Gustafson Baskin School of Engineering UC Santa Cruz tjg at soe.ucsc.edu 831-459-5354

Hi, We've been using autofs and LDAP automount maps for years now, and it has worked well. We run an environment that has CentOS, RHEL, Solaris and FreeBSD servers and clients. Historically, all our automount maps have looked like this: -vers=3 server:/export/home/& However, we're switching to NFSv4 and therefore we need to remove the -vers=3 flag. For CentOS 6.3, Solaris and

On 06/08/2015 11:34 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On 06/07/2015 11:05 PM, g wrote: >> On 06/07/2015 07:25 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> <<>> >> >>> So, I'm not sure how to interpret what you said. Can I get the same >>> results from a CentOS install using some combination of options? >> >> because your are playing with multi flavors, >>

>I am interested in R as an alternative for a statistical tool >at our firm. Ditto... I have recently moved to this agency from a company where I had access to Splus. There is also a coworker here who had used Splus at a previous employer. We both would like some access to the S language. We are considering either begging loud and long to try to get the agency to purchase two copies of