search for: barve

...ied doing that too, just to try it out, but as expected, it didn't work. What do I need to set in order to see my other folders in the 'mail' directory? Thanks, Saurabh. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- Saurabh Barve Phone : (970) 491-7714 E-mail : sa at atmos.colostate.edu System Administrator, Montgomery Research Group, Deptt of Atmos. Sci., CSU, Fort Collins, CO - 80523

Hey list, Finally got up and running, and now am trying to figure out why dovecot would only accept imap connections - I have people that are happy with pop, but they can only authenticate when they use imap. Is there a conf setting for this somewhere that I am missing? -- Mitch

...bh -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Yours is to work. The results will take care of themselves" -- Swami Vivekanand -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Saurabh Barve sa at atmos.colostate.edu (970)491-7714

Hi, I am running dovecot 0.99-14 on a Fedora Core 2 machine. I had a few questions: 1) I wanted to upgrade to the dovecot-1.0 release. However, I am not sure if that's really required. dovecot-0.99-14 has been running very well for me for quite some time. Is there a real advantage to switching to the latest release. The reason I'm asking this is because: i) I don't have too

I am having a problem with Dovecot and imap; users are not being able to empty their trash from time to time. Here is what I am running: [root at xxxx root]# rpm -q dovecot dovecot-0.99.13-3.FC3 [root at xxxx root]# uname -a Linux xxxx 2.6.12-1.1381_FC3smp #1 SMP Fri Oct 21 04:03:26 EDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root at xxxx root]# Several times a week different users get the following pop

Tested with 'make check-release'. tests/parallel (in check-slow) failed, although it does regularly and that seems to be because of libvirt. Rich.

In the kernel and qemu communities it is routine for patches that will be backported to stable branches to be posted for review. I'm proposing we do the same for libguestfs stable branches. All of the attached have been tested with 'make check-release'. Rich.