search for: balacing

I''ve just spent a while chasing a false bug in lighttpd and load balancing among external fast cgi processes due to what I think is a documentation bug. Following the info on the wiki page <http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/LighttpdWithProcessScripts>, one would think that something like this works: fastcgi.debug = 1 fastcgi.server = ( ".fcgi" => (

Hello everybody. I''m running linux 2.6.19 with nth match to alternatively snat outgoing connections to two different ip addresses for load balancing between two adsl lines: Here is: $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m multiport --dports 80,443 -m statistic --mode nth --every 2 -j SNAT --to adslA $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m multiport

There was a lengthy power failure here in Shoreline this morning and my firewall did not come back up when power was restored. The firewall is now up and service to the server has been restored. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \

Hi, i''m reading the administrator guide of xcp, http://www.xen.org/files/XenCloud/reference.pdf, and it''s say that workload load balacing is possible (like citrix xenessiential). Could you tell me where i can download the install cd ? Alexandre Derumier Ingénieur Système Tél : 03.20.68.88.90 Fax : 03.20.68.90.81 45 Bd du général Leclercq 59100 Roubaix - France _______________________________________________ Xen-users...

...ce clients ask for specific DNS entries and those point to the first DC). Reading up on howtos, googling like mad and thinking about this we found no real way to make this work as our initial idea. So the question remains; is there any point in running more than one Samba4 DC for redundancy/load balacing issues or is the only point to have it as a backup? Regards, /Dieter

...ss add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 200kbit burst 10kbit #class for the clients /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 100kbit burst 10kbit ceil 100kbit prio 10 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 100kbit burst 10kbit ceil 100kbit prio 10 #balacing /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:20 handle 20: sfq perturb 10 #filter /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 protocol 802.1q parent 1: prio 1 handle 9 fw flowid 1:1 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 protocol 802.1q parent 1:1 prio 1 u32 match...

...the error comes back. I have the maildirs through NFS, but I set to store the INDEX files locally. I have failover configuration, that means when one of my servers die another one takes the active IP and start to serve dovecot users, so its always one server that serves all the users, no load balacing. Any idea what am I missing or how could I fixed this problem? uname -a Linux mx02.m.mydomain.tld 4.19.0-5-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.37-5 (2019-06-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux dovecot -n # 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.4 () # OS: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64...

I think I have 4 options. 1, Modify chan_sip.c to update a new field in sipusers realtime table with the status of the sip peer/user. Then use agi to dial sip calls. Check the status field if OK then dial the fullcontact from the sip table. If not goto voicemail or where ever else I want the call to go.. The UA would only register to one server, so only one server *should* be writing to the

...le -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -j MARK --set-mark 0x2 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j CONNMARK --save-mark iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --restore-mark After giving a try during several days, I''ve found that another firewall solution, shorewall [2], implements built-in load balacing for free by using the following set of instructions: iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark ! --mark 0/0xFF -j CONNMARK --restore-mark --mask 0xFF iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -m connmark ! --mark 0/0xFF -j CONNMARK --restore-mark --mask 0xFF iptables -t mangle -N routemark iptables -t man...

Hi guys, Can you take a look at this? :) +-----------+ | | eth1-|- | | -|-eth0---LAN--- | | eth2-|- | | | +-----------+ - eth0 is connected to the LAN having the IP=LAN_IP eth1 is connected to the first ISP having IP=ISP_IP_1 and GW=ISP_GW_1 eth2 is connected to the second ISP having IP=ISP_IP_2 and GW=ISP_GW_2 I need

From: Collins Richey > Sounds pretty religious-based to me. > IBM=bad > HP,Sun, RedHat, SCO=good. > OTOH, from some of your comments, Novell=better. Are you really that shallow? IBM is our partner, not our friend. Sun has its interests too, and has 5 different entities of focus, which vary. Red Hat is a tale of two companies, cut-throat business combined with GPL-analness (like

...What I'd like to implement is a redundant system with 2 servers, one in NA, one in EU. And I'd also like to be able to add another server if needed on the west coast. Idea is, that if a server goes down, the users will be able to still receive and send mails, and never loose mails. For geobalacing and failover, I read that I can do it with DNS ( I'm with easydns ). I'm at the first stage where I collect informations that I try to understand and foresee a solution. First idea is to set up servers with a mysql master, slaves and a glusterfs in replica mode on the servers. I tried glu...