search for: badsig

Howdy, Is there a method to get the number of elements in an aggregation? Are the results stored in an aggregation guaranteed to be in any type of order? Thanks for any insight, - Ryan -- UNIX Administrator http://daemons.net/~matty

...ith the ubuntu repository at the bristol UK mirror. When my source.list has this line: deb http://www.stats.bris.ac.uk/R/bin/linux/ubuntu/ intrepid/ On an "apt-get update" you get this: W: GPG error: http://www.stats.bris.ac.uk intrepid/ Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG D67FC6EAE2A11821 Vincent Goulet <vincent.goulet at act.ulaval.ca> Whereas if I use another mirror e.g.: deb http://cran.cnr.berkeley.edu/bin/linux/ubuntu/ intrepid/ I don't get such an error. It could be a problem this end but I think it is more likely that something is going wrong wi...

...sue after switching the backend. The switch command completes successfully. Bind starts but I get errors when attempting to run this command after reboot. samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names I get this error for all updates. TSIG error with server: tsig indicates error update failed: NOTAUTH(BADSIG) Failed nsupdate: 2 update(nsupdate): A gc._msdcs.domain.local 172.16.22.27 Calling nsupdate for A gc._msdcs.domain.local 172.16.22.27 (add) Successfully obtained Kerberos ticket to DNS/DDC1.domain.local as DDC2$ Outgoing update query: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: UPDATE, status: NOERROR, id...

...ssfully. Bind starts but I get errors when attempting to run >> this command after reboot. >> >> samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names >> >> I get this error for all updates. >> >> TSIG error with server: tsig indicates error >> update failed: NOTAUTH(BADSIG) >> Failed nsupdate: 2 >> update(nsupdate): A gc._msdcs.domain.local 172.16.22.27 >> Calling nsupdate for A gc._msdcs.domain.local 172.16.22.27 (add) >> Successfully obtained Kerberos ticket to DNS/DDC1.domain.local as >> DDC2$ Outgoing update query: >> ;; ->&...

Hi, I just started getting errors from APT: W: GPG error: http://apt.puppetlabs.com squeeze Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 1054B7A24BD6EC30 Puppet Labs Release Key (Puppet Labs Release Key) <info@puppetlabs.com> It looks like they keyring was changed yesterday on the APT repository: keyring.gpg 09-Jan-2013 14:51 2.5K However, I''ve yet to see an announcement about this. So, was this actually done by P...

...547282-1077 - S-1-5-7 [2012/11/18 15:59:47, 0] ../source4/rpc_server/handles.c:102(dcesrv_handle_fetch) ... also failed to update dns entry: Nov 18 17:52:56 sambadc named[752]: client 192.168.12.34#57038: request has invalid signature: TSIG 1236950581266-2 (w2000\$\@XXX.LAN): tsig verify failure (BADSIG) I would suggest that it has something todo with the default setting of RequireSignOrSeal or RequireStrongKey which defaults to 0 in windows 2000 afaik, but I'm not sure. Any other suggestions ? thanks odi

I am also seeing this in smbd.log: [2020/07/03 09:20:18.211558, 1] ../../auth/kerberos/gssapi_helper.c:391(gssapi_check_packet) GSS VerifyMic failed: A token had an invalid MIC: unknown mech-code 2529638943 for mech 1 2 840 113554 1 2 2 [2020/07/03 09:20:18.211625, 0] ../../source4/auth/gensec/gensec_gssapi.c:1347(gensec_gssapi_check_packet)

...amed[6494]: samba_dlz: committed > transaction on zone ad.fvg.lnf.it > Jun 15 05:48:45 vdcsv2 named[6494]: client 10.5.2.64#50303: > request has invalid signature: TSIG > 1628-ms-7.213-4064bc3.c1816194-6fb1-11e8-5eb7-3464a91c1e49 > (ALBERT\$\@AD.FVG.LNF.IT): tsig verify failure (BADSIG) > > > Looking at: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Bind9#File_.2Fetc.2Fbind.2Fnamed.conf > > the note: > > // Configure the communication channel for > Administrative BIND9 with rndc > // By default, they key is in the rndc.key file and is > used by rndc an...

...register within the DNS zone they should. I reviewed my logs and compaired them to yours. That looks the same execpt i dont have message like : >> request has invalid signature: TSIG 1592-ms-7.34-f336b9d.cc4eac93-69d4-11e8-1eb6-dc4a3e58a634 (QUIRINIUS\$\@AD.FVG.LNF.IT): tsig verify failure (BADSIG) The "quick fix" could be, remove these dns entries and reboot the pc. ( but wait with that ) A cause might be, - 2 x pc with the same name. - The rights op this object in the DNS are not correct and the "dhcp service" user is unable to update it. - The pc joint with a stati...

...command completes > successfully. Bind starts but I get errors when attempting to run > this command after reboot. > > samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names > > I get this error for all updates. > > TSIG error with server: tsig indicates error > update failed: NOTAUTH(BADSIG) > Failed nsupdate: 2 > update(nsupdate): A gc._msdcs.domain.local 172.16.22.27 > Calling nsupdate for A gc._msdcs.domain.local 172.16.22.27 (add) > Successfully obtained Kerberos ticket to DNS/DDC1.domain.local as > DDC2$ Outgoing update query: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcod...

...en > >> attempting to run this command after reboot. > >> > >> samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names > >> > >> I get this error for all updates. > >> > >> TSIG error with server: tsig indicates error > >> update failed: NOTAUTH(BADSIG) > >> Failed nsupdate: 2 > >> update(nsupdate): A gc._msdcs.domain.local 172.16.22.27 > >> Calling nsupdate for A gc._msdcs.domain.local 172.16.22.27 (add) > >> Successfully obtained Kerberos ticket to DNS/DDC1.domain.local as > >> DDC2$ Outgoing update...

...I added the second DC to the domain, the join went OK with no errors reported, but the log shows errors relating to dns updates and the SRV records etc for the new DC have not been created. Running samba_dnsupdate on the new DC results in "Failed update of 26 entries", all with NOTAUTH(BADSIG) errors (also TSIG errors, but I understand that's to be expected as the internal dns server doesn't support TSIG). The log on the original DC shows these errors: [2018/02/26 21:08:10.634806, 1] ../auth/kerberos/gssapi_helper.c:388(gssapi_check_packet) GSS VerifyMic failed: A token ha...

...ad.fvg.lnf.it/NONE': adding an RR at 'ALBERT.ad.fvg.lnf.it' A > Jun 15 05:48:45 vdcsv2 named[6494]: client 10.5.2.64#50303: > request has invalid signature: TSIG > 1628-ms-7.213-4064bc3.c1816194-6fb1-11e8-5eb7-3464a91c1e49 > (ALBERT\$\@AD.FVG.LNF.IT): tsig verify failure (BADSIG) > > I think the first part is dnsupdate doing the update and the second > part is the client trying to update its own record and failing. > Just what is telling 'dnsupdate' to update the records ?? > > > > > Where is the reverse zone? > > > > Th...

...manager so I thought id try the terminal to update. I have version 8.04.1 W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used.GPG error: http://wine.budgetdedicated.com hardy Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 58403026387EE263 Scott Ritchie <scott at open-vote.org> W: GPG error: http://falcon.landure.fr hardy Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 1CA3E3239FA7DC39 W: Failed to fetch http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/apt/dists/har...

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > This is probably where you are going wrong. AD lives and dies on DNS, > your DC MUST be authoritative for the AD domain. ...but *is* authoritative! Simply DHCP server assign the ''old'' DNS, where all resolution fr the AD (sub)domain are forwarded to AD DNS... > Your AD clients should be using the DC as

...verify error: GSSAPI error: Major = A token had an invalid Message Integrity Check (MIC), Minor = Unknown error. [...] 22-Apr-2013 13:50:56.707 security: error: client 172.16.200.66#1351: request has invalid signature: TSIG 910533066770-2 (smb4testwin2k\$\@AD.MYCOMPANY.COM) : tsig verify failure (BADSIG) Anyone knows more about that and know how to debug/fix that? Any help appreciated. Thanks a lot. Lucas.

...NOERROR, id: 0 ;; flags:; ZONE: 0, PREREQ: 0, UPDATE: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; UPDATE SECTION: _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.ForestDnsZones.brockley.harte-lyne.ca. 900 IN SRV 0 100 389 SMB4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca. ; TSIG error with server: tsig indicates error update failed: NOTAUTH(BADSIG) Failed nsupdate: 2 So, where are the dynamic update keys kept and why is the key signature wrong, or missing)? -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy Do NOT open attach...

On 1/2/2018 12:25 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 12:09:33 -0500 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >>     Installing bind9 on my Ubuntu 14.04 via. apt-get displays the >> following options. >> >>  #named -V >> BIND 9.9.5-3ubuntu0.16-Ubuntu (Extended Support Version) >>

...ld. > > I reviewed my logs and compaired them to yours. That looks > the same execpt i dont have message like : > > >> request has invalid signature: TSIG > 1592-ms-7.34-f336b9d.cc4eac93-69d4-11e8-1eb6-dc4a3e58a634 > (QUIRINIUS\$\@AD.FVG.LNF.IT): tsig verify failure (BADSIG) > > As stated in previous email, i'm suffering some connectivity trouble > now, so some errors are expected; after some seconds, client register > itself correctly. > > > > A cause might be, > > - 2 x pc with the same name. > > - The rights op this objec...

...;brockley.harte-lyne.ca. IN SOA ;; UPDATE SECTION: _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.ForestDnsZones.brockley.harte-lyne.ca. 900 IN SRV 0 100 389 SMB4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca. ;; TSIG PSEUDOSECTION: 489873631.sig-SMB4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca. 0 ANY TSIG gss-tsig. 1593782418 300 0 38762 BADSIG 0 Failed nsupdate: 2 . . . root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# netstat -an | grep -i listen | grep 53 . . . tcp4 0 0 192.168.18.161.53 *.* LISTEN tcp4 0 0 127.0.161.1.53 *.* LISTEN As far as I can determine the secret key and sig...