Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "backup_2_netdev".
Did you mean:
backup_1_netdev
2018 Apr 19
2
[virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:00:51PM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> On 4/18/2018 9:41 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:33:34PM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> > > On 4/17/2018 5:26 PM, Siwei Liu wrote:
> > > > I ran this with a few folks offline and gathered some good feedbacks
> > > > that I'd like to share thus revive
2018 Apr 19
0
[virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...uld only be used
> when main device is not present.
The current bypass module supports 3-netdev and 2-netdev models via 2 sets of interfaces
bypass_master_create/destroy and bypass_master_register/unregister.? So theoretically
we can support the 2 models via 2 different feature bits. BACKUP and BACKUP_2_NETDEV.
Similarly if we can figure out a way to hide both the netdevs, we can add BACKUP_1_NETDEV
feature bit and update the bypass module to provide another set of interfaces that can
be used by virtio_net to support this model.
Now that we are leaning towards 'standby' as the name for the lowe...