search for: backup_1_netdev

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:00:51PM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: > On 4/18/2018 9:41 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:33:34PM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: > > > On 4/17/2018 5:26 PM, Siwei Liu wrote: > > > > I ran this with a few folks offline and gathered some good feedbacks > > > > that I'd like to share thus revive

...-netdev and 2-netdev models via 2 sets of interfaces bypass_master_create/destroy and bypass_master_register/unregister.? So theoretically we can support the 2 models via 2 different feature bits. BACKUP and BACKUP_2_NETDEV. Similarly if we can figure out a way to hide both the netdevs, we can add BACKUP_1_NETDEV feature bit and update the bypass module to provide another set of interfaces that can be used by virtio_net to support this model. Now that we are leaning towards 'standby' as the name for the lower virtio-net, should we change the feature bit name also to VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY? >